3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF EGRET AND HERON BROOD REDUCTION.

      1 , 2
      Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Data from great egrets and great blue herons were used to test a fundamental assumption of Lack's brood-reduction hypothesis, that mortality is brood-size dependent. This was confirmed for the largest brood sizes (4 and 3), which, in egrets, also have the highest sib-fighting rates. Broods of one, however, experienced paradoxically high mortality, especially early in the season. The hypothesis is advanced that parents desert unprofitably small broods when sufficient time remains for production of a larger brood. A simple game-theory model shows that this parental desertion may hinge primarily on the overall costs of renesting. Egret brood reduction caused by sibling aggression (siblicide) occurred later than less aggressive forms of brood reduction. The inclusive fitness of senior broodmates is maximized by the successful fledging of all sibs, and the physical superiority of seniors (in food-handling for herons; food-handling and aggression for egrets) usually suffices to guarantee their own welfare in brood competitions. Finally, it is shown that the last chick in asynchronously hatching broods represents two kinds of reproductive value (RV) to the parents-"extra RV" (obtained despite the survival of elder sibs) and "insurance RV" (obtained only when at least one elder sib dies first)-which can be distinguished from field data. This approach can be used in comparisons with other asynchronous species for partitioning the fitness contributions of marginal offspring.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Evolution
          Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
          Wiley
          1558-5646
          0014-3820
          May 1986
          : 40
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019.
          [2 ] Department of Zoology, University of Liverpool, PO Box 147, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, U.K.
          Article
          10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00499.x
          28556322
          06f8cc99-4722-4e41-ab22-70843cd9a831
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article