14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Relationship Between Coping Strategies, Quality of Life, and Mood in Patients with Incurable Cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with incurable cancer face many physical and emotional stressors, yet little is known about their coping strategies or the relationship between their coping strategies, quality of life (QOL) and mood.

          Methods

          As part of a randomized trial of palliative care, this study assessed baseline QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General), mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and coping (Brief COPE) in patients within 8 weeks of a diagnosis of incurable lung or gastrointestinal cancer and before randomization. To examine associations between coping strategies, QOL, and mood, we used linear regression, adjusting for patients’ age, sex, marital status, and cancer type.

          Results
          Participant Sample

          There were 350 participants (mean age, 64.9 years), and the majority were male (54.0%), were married (70.0%), and had lung cancer (54.6%). Most reported high utilization of emotional support coping (77.0%), whereas fewer reported high utilization of acceptance (44.8%), self-blame (37.9%), and denial (28.2%). Emotional support (QOL: β = 2.65, P < .01; depression: β = −0.56, P = .02) and acceptance (QOL: β = 1.55, P < .01; depression: β = −0.37, P = .01; anxiety: β = −0.34, P = .02) correlated with better QOL and mood. Denial (QOL: β = −1.97, P < .01; depression: β = 0.36, P = .01; anxiety: β = 0.61, P < .01) and self-blame (QOL: β = −2.31, P < .01; depression: β = 0.58, P < .01; anxiety: β = 0.66, P < .01) correlated with worse QOL and mood.

          Conclusion

          Patients with newly diagnosed, incurable cancer use a variety of coping strategies. The use of emotional support and acceptance coping strategies correlated with better QOL and mood, whereas the use of denial and self-blame negatively correlated with these outcomes. Interventions to improve patients’ QOL and mood should seek to cultivate the use of adaptive coping strategies.

          Precis

          Patients with a new diagnosis of incurable cancer cope in a variety of unique ways. We found that patients’ use of certain coping strategies correlated with their QOL and mood, suggesting that evaluating and addressing patients’ coping behaviors may impact other key patient-reported outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences.

            Physicians have an ethical obligation to honor patients' values for care, including at the end of life (EOL). We sought to evaluate factors that help patients to receive care consistent with their preferences. This was a longitudinal multi-institutional cohort study. We measured baseline preferences for life-extending versus symptom-directed care and actual EOL care received in 325 patients with advanced cancer. We also measured associated sociodemographic, health, and communication characteristics, including EOL discussions between patients and physicians. Preferences were assessed a median of 125 days before death. Overall, 68% of patients (220 of 325 patients) received EOL care consistent with baseline preferences. The proportion was slightly higher among patients who recognized they were terminally ill (74%, 90 of 121 patients; P = .05). Patients who recognized their terminal illness were more likely to prefer symptom-directed care (83%, 100 of 121 patients; v 66%, 127 of 191 patients; P = .003). However, some patients who were aware they were terminally ill wished to receive life-extending care (17%, 21 of 121 patients). Patients who reported having discussed their wishes for EOL care with a physician (39%, 125 of 322 patients) were more likely to receive care that was consistent with their preferences, both in the full sample (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26; P < .0001) and among patients who were aware they were terminally ill (OR = 3.94; P = .0005). Among patients who received no life-extending measures, physical distress was lower (mean score, 3.1 v 4.1; P = .03) among patients for whom such care was consistent with preferences. Patients with cancer are more likely to receive EOL care that is consistent with their preferences when they have had the opportunity to discuss their wishes for EOL care with a physician.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study.

              To draw on narrative interviews with patients with lung cancer and to explore their perceptions and experience of stigma. Qualitative study. United Kingdom. 45 patients with lung cancer recruited through several sources. Participants experienced stigma commonly felt by patients with other types of cancer, but, whether they smoked or not, they felt particularly stigmatised because the disease is so strongly associated with smoking. Interaction with family, friends, and doctors was often affected as a result, and many patients, particularly those who had stopped smoking years ago or had never smoked, felt unjustly blamed for their illness. Those who resisted victim blaming maintained that the real culprits were tobacco companies with unscrupulous policies. Some patients concealed their illness, which sometimes had adverse financial consequences or made it hard for them to gain support from other people. Some indicated that newspaper and television reports may have added to the stigma: television advertisements aim to put young people off tobacco, but they usually portray a dreadful death, which may exacerbate fear and anxiety. A few patients were worried that diagnosis, access to care, and research into lung cancer might be adversely affected by the stigma attached to the disease and those who smoke. Patients with lung cancer report stigmatisation with far reaching consequences. Efforts to help people to quit smoking are important, but clinical and educational interventions should be presented with care so as not to add to the stigma experienced by patients with lung cancer and other smoking related diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0374236
                2771
                Cancer
                Cancer
                Cancer
                0008-543X
                1097-0142
                17 November 2016
                18 April 2016
                01 July 2016
                01 July 2017
                : 122
                : 13
                : 2110-2116
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [b ]Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [c ]Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                Address Correspondence: Dr. Ryan Nipp at Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Yawkey, Boston, MA 02114, RNipp@ 123456MGH.Harvard.edu , P: 617-724-4000, F: 617-724-1135
                Article
                PMC5160928 PMC5160928 5160928 nihpa822563
                10.1002/cncr.30025
                5160928
                27089045
                09430158-b314-4d8c-8a60-041e029c28ac
                History
                Categories
                Article

                Palliative Care,Incurable Cancer,Anxiety,Depression,Quality of Life,Coping Behavior

                Comments

                Comment on this article