Blog
About

49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    12
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder. Remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence.

      Archives of general psychiatry

      Treatment Outcome, Depressive Disorder, diagnosis, psychology, therapy, Humans, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Recurrence, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, standards, statistics & numerical data, Severity of Illness Index, Terminology as Topic

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 1988, the MacArthur Foundation Research Network on the Psychobiology of Depression convened a task force to examine the ways in which change points in the course of depressive illness had been described and the extent to which inconsistency in these descriptions might be impeding research on this disorder. We found considerable inconsistency across and even within research reports and concluded that research on depressive illness would be well served by greater consistency in the definition change points in the course of illness. We propose an internally consistent, empirically defined conceptual scheme for the terms remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. In addition, we propose tentative operational criteria for each term. Finally, we discuss ways to assess the usefulness of such operational criteria through reanalysis of existing data and the design and conduct of new experiments.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          1929776

          Comments

          Comment on this article