7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      1000 Families Study, a UK multiwave cohort investigating the well-being of families of children with intellectual disabilities: cohort profile

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The 1000 Families Study is a large, UK-based, cohort of families of children with intellectual disability (ID). The main use of the cohort data will be to describe and explore correlates of the well-being of families of children with ID, including parents and siblings, using cross-sectional and (eventually) longitudinal analyses. The present cohort profile intends to describe the achieved cohort.

          Participants

          Over 1000 families of UK children with ID aged between 4 and 15 years 11 months (total n=1184) have been recruited. The mean age of the cohort was 9.01 years old. The cohort includes more boys (61.8%) than girls (27.0%; missing 11.1%). Parents reported that 45.5% (n=539) of the children have autism. Most respondents were a female primary caregiver (84.9%), and 78.0% were the biological mother of the cohort child with ID. The largest ethnic group for primary caregivers was White British (78.5%), over half were married and living with their partner (53.3%) and 39.3% were educated to degree level.

          Findings to date

          Data were collected on family, parental and child well-being, as well as demographic information. Wave 1 data collection took place between November 2015 and January 2017, primarily through online questionnaires. Telephone interviews were also completed by 644 primary caregivers.

          Future plans

          Wave 2 data collection is ongoing and the research team will continue following up these families in subsequent waves, subject to funding availability. Results will be used to inform policy and practice on family and child well-being in families of children with ID. As this cohort profile aims to describe the cohort, future publications will explore relevant research questions and report key findings related to family well-being.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Children's perceptions of the qualities of sibling relationships.

            Although many studies of family constellations exist, only recently have investigators begun to examine the qualities of sibling relationships. The purpose of the present investigation was to develop a systematic framework for describing and assessing such relationship qualities. In the first study, upper elementary school children were interviewed about their perceptions of the qualities of their sibling relationships. These interviews yielded a list of 15 salient qualities. In the second study, a self-report questionnaire that assessed their perceptions of these qualities was administered to a sample of 198 fifth- and sixth-grade children. A principal components analysis yielded 4 underlying factors: (a) Warmth/Closeness, (b) Relative Status/Power, (c) Conflict, and (d) Rivalry. Relative Status/Power was found to be strongly related to the relative ages of the child and sibling. The other 3 factors were also related to various family constellation variables, but these relations were modest in size. Because family constellation variables and the qualities of sibling relationships are not isomorphic with one another, it is important to study relationship qualities directly, rather than simply examining family constellation variables. Some of the determinants of such qualities are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of comparative studies of depression in mothers of children with and without developmental disabilities.

              Meta-analysis was used to synthesize findings from comparative studies of depression in mothers of children with and without developmental disabilities. Effect sizes were determined for 18 studies conducted between 1984 and 2003. A weighted effect size of .39 indicated an elevated level of depression in mothers of children with developmental disabilities. Planned comparisons found that age of child and disability category moderated effect sizes. Results show that mothers of children with developmental disabilities are at elevated risk of depression compared to mothers of typically developing children. Depression in mothers of children with developmental disabilities is a condition that is presently not being addressed on a wide scale, although promising interventions are available.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                12 February 2020
                : 10
                : 2
                : e032919
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentCentre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR) , University of Warwick , Coventry, West Midlands, UK
                [2 ] departmentCentre for Developmental Psychiatry and Psychology, Department of Psychiatry , Monash University , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
                [3 ] departmentDivision of Psychiatry , University College London , London, UK
                [4 ] Cerebra , Carmarthen, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Caitlin A Murray; C.Murray.7@ 123456warwick.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-8270
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-2727
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1104-3885
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7547-736X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-1734
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3068-2076
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-032919
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032919
                7045113
                32051311
                098cfd57-0419-4f64-99eb-416e215c1cc2
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 July 2019
                : 08 January 2020
                : 09 January 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002833, Cerebra;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000741, University of Warwick;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269, Economic and Social Research Council;
                Award ID: ES/J500203/1
                Categories
                Mental Health
                Cohort Profile
                1506
                1712
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                family research,intellectual disability,wellbeing,longitudinal
                Medicine
                family research, intellectual disability, wellbeing, longitudinal

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content223

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors393