61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identifying Metaphoric Antonyms in a Corpus Analysis of Finance Articles

      Preprint
      ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Using a corpus of 17,000+ financial news reports (involving over 10M words), we perform an analysis of the argument-distributions of the UP and DOWN verbs used to describe movements of indices, stocks and shares. In Study 1 participants identified antonyms of these verbs in a free-response task and a matching task from which the most commonly identified antonyms were compiled. In Study 2, we determined whether the argument-distributions for the verbs in these antonym-pairs were sufficiently similar to predict the most frequently-identified antonym. Cosine similarity correlates moderately with the proportions of antonym-pairs identified by people (r = 0.31). More impressively, 87% of the time the most frequently-identified antonym is either the first- or second-most similar pair in the set of alternatives. The implications of these results for distributional approaches to determining metaphoric knowledge are discussed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          2012-12-13
          2013-02-04
          Article
          1212.3139
          30b088aa-0fe6-40cd-aee0-da5c2e4feed7

          http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

          History
          Custom metadata
          Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci '11), Boston, MA, USA, 20-23 July, 2011
          arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1212.3138
          cs.CL

          Theoretical computer science
          Theoretical computer science

          Comments

          Comment on this article