112
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Increased HIV-1 vaccine efficacy against viruses with genetic signatures in Env-V2

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 4 , 5 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 1 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 2 , 3 , 1
      Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          The RV144 trial demonstrated 31% vaccine efficacy (VE) at preventing HIV-1 infection 1 . Antibodies against the HIV-1 envelope variable loops 1 and 2 (V1/V2) domain correlated inversely with infection risk 2 . We hypothesized that vaccine-induced immune responses against V1/V2 would selectively impact, or sieve, HIV-1 breakthrough viruses. 936 HIV-1 genome sequences from 44 vaccine and 66 placebo recipients were examined. We show that vaccine-induced immune responses were associated with two signatures in V1/V2 at amino-acid positions 169 and 181. VE against viruses matching the vaccine at position 169 was 48% (CI: 18 to 66%; p=0.0036), whereas VE against viruses mismatching the vaccine at position 181 was 78% (CI: 35% to 93%; p=0.0028). Residue 169 is in a cationic glycosylated region recognized by broadly neutralizing and RV144-derived antibodies. The predicted distance between the two signatures sites (21±7 Å), and their match/mismatch dichotomy, suggest that multiple factors may be involved in the protection observed in RV144. Genetic signatures of RV144 vaccination in V2 complement the finding of an association between high V1/V2 binding antibodies and reduced risk of HIV-1 acquisition and provide evidence that vaccine-induced V2 responses plausibly played a role in the partial protection conferred by the RV144 regimen.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Applying Cox regression to competing risks.

          Two methods are given for the joint estimation of parameters in models for competing risks in survival analysis. In both cases Cox's proportional hazards regression model is fitted using a data duplication method. In principle either method can be used for any number of different failure types, assuming independent risks. Advantages of the augmented data approach are that it limits over-parametrisation and it runs immediately on existing software. The methods are used to reanalyse data from two well-known published studies, providing new insights.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Envelope-constrained neutralization-sensitive HIV-1 after heterosexual transmission.

            Heterosexual transmission accounts for the majority of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infections worldwide, yet the viral properties that determine transmission fitness or outgrowth have not been elucidated. Here we show, for eight heterosexual transmission pairs, that recipient viruses were monophyletic, encoding compact, glycan-restricted envelope glycoproteins. These viruses were also uniquely sensitive to neutralization by antibody from the transmitting partner. Thus, the exposure of neutralizing epitopes, which are lost in chronic infection because of immune escape, appears to be favored in the newly infected host. This reveals characteristics of the envelope glycoprotein that influence HIV-1 transmission and may have implications for vaccine design.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Nomenclature for immune correlates of protection after vaccination.

              Identification of immune correlates of protection after vaccination is an important part of vaccinology for both theoretical and practical reasons. The terminology and definition of correlates have been confusing, because different authors have used variable terms and concepts. Here, we attempt to give precision to the field by defining 3 terms: correlate of protection (CoP), mechanistic correlate of protection (mCoP), and nonmechanistic correlate of protection (nCoP). A CoP is a marker of immune function that statistically correlates with protection after vaccination that may be either an mCoP, which is a mechanistic cause of protection, or an nCoP, which does not cause protection but nevertheless predicts protection through its (partial) correlation with another immune response(s) that mechanistically protects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                4 September 2012
                10 September 2012
                18 October 2012
                18 April 2013
                : 490
                : 7420
                : 417-420
                Affiliations
                [1 ]US Military HIV Research Program, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, USA
                [2 ]Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
                [3 ]Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
                [4 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
                [5 ]IAVI Neutralizing Antibody Center and Department of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
                [6 ]Royal Thai Army Component, AFRIMS, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
                [7 ]Thai Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
                [8 ]Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
                [9 ]Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington 98052, USA
                Author notes
                [*]

                contributed equally

                Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.R. ( mrolland@ 123456hivresearch.org ).
                Article
                NIHMS403396
                10.1038/nature11519
                3551291
                22960785
                099db5c4-857c-465d-91cf-b3f2cdb26247

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Extramural Activities : NIAID
                Award ID: Y01 AI2642-12 || AI
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Extramural Activities : NIAID
                Award ID: R37 AI054165 || AI
                Funded by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Extramural Activities : NIAID
                Award ID: R01 AI054165 || AI
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article