Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a syndrome in need of clarity

Abstract

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) originally understood to be limited to renal and hematopoietic involvement. Whereas aberrations in complement regulatory proteins (CRPs), C3 or complement factor B (CFB) are detected in ∼60% of patients, a complement-derived pathogenesis that reflects dysregulation of the alternative pathway (AP) of complement activation is present in ∼90% of patients. aHUS remains a diagnosis of exclusion. The discovery of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13) and its utility in the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) has resulted in the appreciation that cases of aHUS have been inappropriately diagnosed as TTP. Thus there has been an evolving appreciation of clinical manifestations of aHUS that renders the appellation aHUS misleading. This article will review the pathogenesis and the evolving clinical presentations of aHUS, present a hypothesis that there can be a phenotypic expression of aHUS due to a complement storm in a disorder where direct endothelial damage occurs and discuss future areas of research to more clearly define the clinical spectrum and management of aHUS.