8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improvement of the software for modeling the dynamics of epidemics and developing a user-friendly interface

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The challenges humanity is facing due to the Covid-19 pandemic require timely and accurate forecasting of the dynamics of various epidemics to minimize the negative consequences for public health and the economy. One can use a variety of well-known and new mathematical models, taking into account a huge number of factors. However, complex models contain a large number of unknown parameters, the values of which must be determined using a limited number of observations, e.g., the daily datasets for the accumulated number of cases. Successful experience in modeling the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that it is possible to apply the simplest SIR model, which contains 4 unknown parameters. Application of the original algorithm of the model parameter identification for the first waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in China, South Korea, Austria, Italy, Germany, France, Spain has shown its high accuracy in predicting their duration and number of diseases. To simulate different epidemic waves and take into account the incompleteness of statistical data, the generalized SIR model and algorithms for determining the values of its parameters were proposed. The interference of the previous waves, changes in testing levels, quarantine or social behavior require constant monitoring of the epidemic dynamics and performing SIR simulations as often as possible with the use of a user-friendly interface. Such tool will allow predicting the dynamics of any epidemic using the data on the number of diseases over a limited period (e.g., 14 days). It will be possible to predict the daily number of new cases for the country as a whole or for its separate region, to estimate the number of carriers of the infection and the probability of facing such a carrier, as well as to estimate the number of deaths. Results of three SIR simulations of the COVID-19 epidemic wave in Japan in the summer of 2022 are presented and discussed. The predicted accumulated and daily numbers of cases agree with the results of observations, especially for the simulation based on the datasets corresponding to the period from July 3 to July 16, 2022. A user-friendly interface also has to ensure an opportunity to compare the epidemic dynamics in different countries/regions and in different years in order to estimate the impact of vaccination levels, quarantine restrictions, social behavior, etc. on the numbers of new infections, death, and mortality rates. As example, the comparison of the COVID-19 pandemic dynamics in Japan in the summer of 2020, 2021 and 2022 is presented. The high level of vaccinations achieved in the summer of 2022 did not save Japan from a powerful pandemic wave. The daily numbers of cases were about ten times higher than in the corresponding period of 2021. Nevertheless, the death per case ratio in 2022 was much lower than in 2020.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time

          In December, 2019, a local outbreak of pneumonia of initially unknown cause was detected in Wuhan (Hubei, China), and was quickly determined to be caused by a novel coronavirus, 1 namely severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The outbreak has since spread to every province of mainland China as well as 27 other countries and regions, with more than 70 000 confirmed cases as of Feb 17, 2020. 2 In response to this ongoing public health emergency, we developed an online interactive dashboard, hosted by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, to visualise and track reported cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real time. The dashboard, first shared publicly on Jan 22, illustrates the location and number of confirmed COVID-19 cases, deaths, and recoveries for all affected countries. It was developed to provide researchers, public health authorities, and the general public with a user-friendly tool to track the outbreak as it unfolds. All data collected and displayed are made freely available, initially through Google Sheets and now through a GitHub repository, along with the feature layers of the dashboard, which are now included in the Esri Living Atlas. The dashboard reports cases at the province level in China; at the city level in the USA, Australia, and Canada; and at the country level otherwise. During Jan 22–31, all data collection and processing were done manually, and updates were typically done twice a day, morning and night (US Eastern Time). As the outbreak evolved, the manual reporting process became unsustainable; therefore, on Feb 1, we adopted a semi-automated living data stream strategy. Our primary data source is DXY, an online platform run by members of the Chinese medical community, which aggregates local media and government reports to provide cumulative totals of COVID-19 cases in near real time at the province level in China and at the country level otherwise. Every 15 min, the cumulative case counts are updated from DXY for all provinces in China and for other affected countries and regions. For countries and regions outside mainland China (including Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan), we found DXY cumulative case counts to frequently lag behind other sources; we therefore manually update these case numbers throughout the day when new cases are identified. To identify new cases, we monitor various Twitter feeds, online news services, and direct communication sent through the dashboard. Before manually updating the dashboard, we confirm the case numbers with regional and local health departments, including the respective centres for disease control and prevention (CDC) of China, Taiwan, and Europe, the Hong Kong Department of Health, the Macau Government, and WHO, as well as city-level and state-level health authorities. For city-level case reports in the USA, Australia, and Canada, which we began reporting on Feb 1, we rely on the US CDC, the government of Canada, the Australian Government Department of Health, and various state or territory health authorities. All manual updates (for countries and regions outside mainland China) are coordinated by a team at Johns Hopkins University. The case data reported on the dashboard aligns with the daily Chinese CDC 3 and WHO situation reports 2 for within and outside of mainland China, respectively (figure ). Furthermore, the dashboard is particularly effective at capturing the timing of the first reported case of COVID-19 in new countries or regions (appendix). With the exception of Australia, Hong Kong, and Italy, the CSSE at Johns Hopkins University has reported newly infected countries ahead of WHO, with Hong Kong and Italy reported within hours of the corresponding WHO situation report. Figure Comparison of COVID-19 case reporting from different sources Daily cumulative case numbers (starting Jan 22, 2020) reported by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE), WHO situation reports, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Chinese CDC) for within (A) and outside (B) mainland China. Given the popularity and impact of the dashboard to date, we plan to continue hosting and managing the tool throughout the entirety of the COVID-19 outbreak and to build out its capabilities to establish a standing tool to monitor and report on future outbreaks. We believe our efforts are crucial to help inform modelling efforts and control measures during the earliest stages of the outbreak.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics

            Abstract The quantification of transmissibility during epidemics is essential to designing and adjusting public health responses. Transmissibility can be measured by the reproduction number R, the average number of secondary cases caused by an infected individual. Several methods have been proposed to estimate R over the course of an epidemic; however, they are usually difficult to implement for people without a strong background in statistical modeling. Here, we present a ready-to-use tool for estimating R from incidence time series, which is implemented in popular software including Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington). This tool produces novel, statistically robust analytical estimates of R and incorporates uncertainty in the distribution of the serial interval (the time between the onset of symptoms in a primary case and the onset of symptoms in secondary cases). We applied the method to 5 historical outbreaks; the resulting estimates of R are consistent with those presented in the literature. This tool should help epidemiologists quantify temporal changes in the transmission intensity of future epidemics by using surveillance data.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Generation time of the alpha and delta SARS-CoV-2 variants: an epidemiological analysis

              Background In May, 2021, the delta (B.1.617.2) SARS-CoV-2 variant became dominant in the UK, superseded by the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant in December, 2021. The delta variant is associated with increased transmissibility compared with the alpha variant, which was the dominant variant in the UK between December, 2020, and May, 2021. To understand transmission and the effectiveness of interventions, we aimed to investigate whether the delta variant generation time (the interval between infections in infector–infectee pairs) is shorter—ie, transmissions are happening more quickly—than that of the alpha variant. Methods In this epidemiological analysis, we analysed transmission data from an ongoing UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) prospective household study. Households were recruited to the study after an index case had a positive PCR test and genomic sequencing was used to determine the variant responsible. By fitting a mathematical transmission model to the data, we estimated the intrinsic generation time (which assumes a constant supply of susceptible individuals throughout infection) and the household generation time (which reflects realised transmission in the study households, accounting for susceptible depletion) for the alpha and delta variants. Findings Between February and August, 2021, 227 households consisting of 559 participants were recruited to the UKHSA study. The alpha variant was detected or assumed to be responsible for infections in 131 households (243 infections in 334 participants) recruited in February–May, and the delta variant in 96 households (174 infections in 225 participants) in May–August. The mean intrinsic generation time was shorter for the delta variant (4·7 days, 95% credible interval [CI] 4·1–5·6) than the alpha variant (5·5 days, 4·7–6·5), with 92% posterior probability. The mean household generation time was 28% (95% CI 0–48%) shorter for the delta variant (3·2 days, 95% CI 2·5–4·2) than the alpha variant (4·5 days, 3·7–5·4), with 97·5% posterior probability. Interpretation The delta variant transmits more quickly in households than the alpha variant, which can be attributed to faster depletion of susceptible individuals in households and a possible decrease in the intrinsic generation time. Interventions such as contact tracing, testing, and isolation might be less effective if transmission of the virus occurs quickly. Funding National Institute for Health Research, UK Health Security Agency, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, and UK Research and Innovation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Infect Dis Model
                Infect Dis Model
                Infectious Disease Modelling
                KeAi Publishing
                2468-2152
                2468-0427
                08 July 2023
                September 2023
                08 July 2023
                : 8
                : 3
                : 806-821
                Affiliations
                [a ]Institute of Hydromechanics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
                [b ]Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine
                Article
                S2468-0427(23)00057-X
                10.1016/j.idm.2023.06.003
                10366461
                37496830
                0a77b243-8895-411b-b2f2-96261276f16c
                © 2023 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 March 2023
                : 20 June 2023
                : 22 June 2023
                Categories
                Article

                covid-19 pandemic,epidemic waves,epidemic dynamics in japan,mathematical modeling of infection diseases,sir model,parameter identification,statistical methods

                Comments

                Comment on this article