13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perceptions of chief clinical information officers on the state of electronic health records systems interoperability in NHS England: a qualitative interview study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In the era of electronic health records (EHR), the ability to share clinical data is a key facilitator of healthcare delivery. Since the introduction of EHRs, this aspect has been extensively studied from the perspective of healthcare providers. Less often explored are the day-to-day challenges surrounding the procurement, deployment, maintenance, and use of interoperable EHR systems, from the perspective of healthcare administrators, such as chief clinical information officers (CCIOs).

          Objective

          Our study aims to capture the perceptions of CCIOs on the current state of EHR interoperability in the NHS, its impact on patient safety, the perceived facilitators and barriers to improving EHR interoperability, and what the future of EHR development in the NHS may entail.

          Methods

          Semi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2020 – October 2021. Convenience sampling was employed to recruit NHS England CCIOs. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed by two independent researchers to identify emerging themes.

          Results

          Fifteen CCIOs participated in the study. Participants reported that limited EHR interoperability contributed to the inability to easily access and transfer data into a unified source, thus resulting in data fragmentation. The resulting lack of clarity on patients' health status negatively impacts patient safety through suboptimal care coordination, duplication of efforts, and more defensive practice. Facilitators to improving interoperability included the recognition of the need by clinicians, patient expectations, and the inherent centralised nature of the NHS. Barriers included systems usability difficulties, and institutional, data management, and financial-related challenges. Looking ahead, participants acknowledged that realising that vision across the NHS would require a renewed focus on mandating data standards, user-centred design, greater patient involvement, and encouraging inter-organisational collaboration.

          Conclusion

          Tackling poor interoperability will require solutions both at the technical level and in the wider policy context. This will involve demanding interoperability functionalities from the outset in procurement contracts, fostering greater inter-organisation cooperation on implementation strategies, and encouraging systems vendors to prioritise interoperability in their products. Only by comprehensively addressing these challenges would the full potential promised by the use of fully interoperable EHRs be realised.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02255-8.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions

          Background The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. Methods A systematic literature review, based on research papers from 1998 to 2009, concerning barriers to the acceptance of EMRs by physicians was conducted. Four databases, "Science", "EBSCO", "PubMed" and "The Cochrane Library", were used in the literature search. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported on physicians' perceived barriers to implementing and using electronic medical records. Electronic medical records are defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information. Results The study includes twenty-two articles that have considered barriers to EMR as perceived by physicians. Eight main categories of barriers, including a total of 31 sub-categories, were identified. These eight categories are: A) Financial, B) Technical, C) Time, D) Psychological, E) Social, F) Legal, G) Organizational, and H) Change Process. All these categories are interrelated with each other. In particular, Categories G (Organizational) and H (Change Process) seem to be mediating factors on other barriers. By adopting a change management perspective, we develop some barrier-related interventions that could overcome the identified barriers. Conclusions Despite the positive effects of EMR usage in medical practices, the adoption rate of such systems is still low and meets resistance from physicians. This systematic review reveals that physicians may face a range of barriers when they approach EMR implementation. We conclude that the process of EMR implementation should be treated as a change project, and led by implementers or change managers, in medical practices. The quality of change management plays an important role in the success of EMR implementation. The barriers and suggested interventions highlighted in this study are intended to act as a reference for implementers of Electronic Medical Records. A careful diagnosis of the specific situation is required before relevant interventions can be determined.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future

            R Evans (2018)
            Describe the state of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in 1992 and their evolution by 2015 and where EHRs are expected to be in 25 years. Further to discuss the expectations for EHRs in 1992 and explore which of them were realized and what events accelerated or disrupted/derailed how EHRs evolved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: results from the MEMO Study.

              Little has been written about physician stress that may be associated with electronic medical records (EMR).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Edmond.li19@imperial.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6947
                12 August 2023
                12 August 2023
                2023
                : 23
                : 158
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7445.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, Institute of Global Health Innovation, , National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, ; London, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.468415.a, ISNI 0000 0004 0442 971X, Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.7445.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, Centre for Mathematics of Precision Healthcare, Department of Mathematics, , Imperial College London, ; London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.7445.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, , Imperial College London, ; London, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.5808.5, ISNI 0000 0001 1503 7226, Department of Community Medicine, Health Information and Decision, , Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, ; Porto, Portugal
                Article
                2255
                10.1186/s12911-023-02255-8
                10423420
                37573388
                0aa2654d-106b-4774-9519-ae29fc59b532
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 12 December 2022
                : 2 August 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013631, Patient Safety Translational Research Centre;
                Award ID: PSTRC-2016-004
                Award ID: PSTRC-2016-004
                Award ID: PSTRC-2016-004
                Award ID: PSTRC-2016-004
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                electronic health records,interoperability,patient safety,health it,health policy,qualitative research,semi-structured interviews

                Comments

                Comment on this article