3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Structural polymorphism and cytotoxicity of brain‐derived β‐amyloid extracts

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To date, more than 37 amyloidogenic proteins have been found to form toxic aggregates that are implicated in the progression of numerous debilitating protein misfolding diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Extensive literature highlights the role of β‐amyloid (Aβ) aggregates in causing excessive neuronal cell loss in the brains of AD patients. In fact, major advances in our understanding of Aβ aggregation process, including kinetics, toxicity, and structures of fibrillar aggregates have been revealed by examining in vitro preparations of synthetic Aβ peptides. However, ongoing research shows that brain‐derived Aβ aggregates have specific characteristics that distinguish them from in vitro prepared species. Notably, the molecular structures of amyloid fibrils grown in the human brain were found to be markedly different than synthetic Aβ fibrils. In addition, recent findings report the existence of heterogeneous Aβ proteoforms in AD brain tissue in contrast to synthetically produced full‐length aggregates. Despite their high relevance to AD progression, brain‐derived Aβ species are less well‐characterized compared with synthetic aggregates. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the literature on brain‐derived Aβ aggregates with particular focus on recent studies that report their structures as well as pathological roles in AD progression. The main motivation of this review is to highlight the importance of utilizing brain‐derived amyloids for characterizing the structural and toxic effects of amyloid species. With this knowledge, brain‐derived aggregates can be adopted to identify more relevant drug targets and validate potent aggregation inhibitors toward designing highly effective therapeutic strategies against AD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references133

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease

          In 2011, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association created separate diagnostic recommendations for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific progress in the interim led to an initiative by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association to update and unify the 2011 guidelines. This unifying update is labeled a “research framework” because its intended use is for observational and interventional research, not routine clinical care. In the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association Research Framework, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined by its underlying pathologic processes that can be documented by postmortem examination or in vivo by biomarkers. The diagnosis is not based on the clinical consequences of the disease (i.e., symptoms/signs) in this research framework, which shifts the definition of AD in living people from a syndromal to a biological construct. The research framework focuses on the diagnosis of AD with biomarkers in living persons. Biomarkers are grouped into those of β amyloid deposition, pathologic tau, and neurodegeneration [AT(N)]. This ATN classification system groups different biomarkers (imaging and biofluids) by the pathologic process each measures. The AT(N) system is flexible in that new biomarkers can be added to the three existing AT(N) groups, and new biomarker groups beyond AT(N) can be added when they become available. We focus on AD as a continuum, and cognitive staging may be accomplished using continuous measures. However, we also outline two different categorical cognitive schemes for staging the severity of cognitive impairment: a scheme using three traditional syndromal categories and a six-stage numeric scheme. It is important to stress that this framework seeks to create a common language with which investigators can generate and test hypotheses about the interactions among different pathologic processes (denoted by biomarkers) and cognitive symptoms. We appreciate the concern that this biomarker-based research framework has the potential to be misused. Therefore, we emphasize, first, it is premature and inappropriate to use this research framework in general medical practice. Second, this research framework should not be used to restrict alternative approaches to hypothesis testing that do not use biomarkers. There will be situations where biomarkers are not available or requiring them would be counterproductive to the specific research goals (discussed in more detail later in the document). Thus, biomarker-based research should not be considered a template for all research into age-related cognitive impairment and dementia; rather, it should be applied when it is fit for the purpose of the specific research goals of a study. Importantly, this framework should be examined in diverse populations. Although it is possible that β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tau deposits are not causal in AD pathogenesis, it is these abnormal protein deposits that define AD as a unique neurodegenerative disease among different disorders that can lead to dementia. We envision that defining AD as a biological construct will enable a more accurate characterization and understanding of the sequence of events that lead to cognitive impairment that is associated with AD, as well as the multifactorial etiology of dementia. This approach also will enable a more precise approach to interventional trials where specific pathways can be targeted in the disease process and in the appropriate people.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Common structure of soluble amyloid oligomers implies common mechanism of pathogenesis.

            Soluble oligomers are common to most amyloids and may represent the primary toxic species of amyloids, like the Abeta peptide in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here we show that all of the soluble oligomers tested display a common conformation-dependent structure that is unique to soluble oligomers regardless of sequence. The in vitro toxicity of soluble oligomers is inhibited by oligomer-specific antibody. Soluble oligomers have a unique distribution in human AD brain that is distinct from fibrillar amyloid. These results indicate that different types of soluble amyloid oligomers have a common structure and suggest they share a common mechanism of toxicity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease

              Alzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disease most often associated with memory deficits and cognitive decline, although less common clinical presentations are increasingly recognized. The cardinal pathological features of the disease have been known for more than one hundred years, and today the presence of these amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are still required for a pathological diagnosis. Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia globally. There remain no effective treatment options for the great majority of patients, and the primary causes of the disease are unknown except in a small number of familial cases driven by genetic mutations. Confounding efforts to develop effective diagnostic tools and disease-modifying therapies is the realization that Alzheimer’s disease is a mixed proteinopathy (amyloid and tau) frequently associated with other age-related processes such as cerebrovascular disease and Lewy body disease. Defining the relationships between and interdependence of various co-pathologies remains an active area of investigation. This review outlines etiologically-linked pathologic features of Alzheimer’s disease, as well as those that are inevitable findings of uncertain significance, such as granulovacuolar degeneration and Hirano bodies. Other disease processes that are frequent, but not inevitable, are also discussed, including pathologic processes that can clinically mimic Alzheimer’s disease. These include cerebrovascular disease, Lewy body disease, TDP-43 proteinopathies and argyrophilic grain disease. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of Alzheimer’s disease pathology, its defining pathologic substrates and the related pathologies that can affect diagnosis and treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sung.lee@ku.ac.ae
                Journal
                Protein Sci
                Protein Sci
                10.1002/(ISSN)1469-896X
                PRO
                Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                0961-8368
                1469-896X
                May 2023
                01 May 2023
                01 May 2023
                : 32
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/pro.v32.5 )
                : e4639
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Science Division, New York University Abu Dhabi Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
                [ 2 ] Department of Biomedical Engineering and Healthcare Engineering Innovation Center Khalifa University of Science and Technology Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
                [ 3 ] Khalifa University's Center for Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Sungmun Lee, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare Engineering Innovation Center, Khalifa University's Center for Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

                Email: sung.lee@ 123456ku.ac.ae

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1699-8376
                Article
                PRO4639
                10.1002/pro.4639
                10127262
                37051675
                0b0d2c96-ec17-4278-b394-1be48a20e969
                © 2023 The Authors. Protein Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Protein Society.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 04 March 2023
                : 13 November 2022
                : 10 April 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 16, Words: 13542
                Categories
                Review
                Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                May 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:25.04.2023

                Biochemistry
                cortical brain extracts,cryo‐em,in vitro aggregation,natural amyloids,neurotoxicity,polymorphism,soluble oligomers,structural biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article