What does the latest research evidence mean for practitioners who work with gay and bisexual men engaging in chemsex?

Frankis, Jamie; Clutterbuck, Dan

doi:10.1136/sextrans-2016-052783

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

What does the latest research evidence mean for practitioners who work with gay and bisexual men engaging in chemsex?

Author(s): Jamie Frankis , Dan Clutterbuck

Publication date Created: April 20 2017

Publication date (Electronic): January 20 2017

Journal: Sexually Transmitted Infections

Publisher: BMJ

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisher PubMed

Bookmark

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Title: Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abbreviated Title: Sex Transm Infect

Publisher: BMJ

ISSN (Print): 1368-4973

ISSN (Electronic): 1472-3263

Publication date Created: April 20 2017

Publication date Created: May 2017

Publication date (Print): May 2017

Publication date (Electronic): January 20 2017

Volume: 93

Issue: 3

Pages: 153-154

Article

DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052783

PubMed ID: 28108700

SO-VID: 0b662bb9-c278-40bb-a671-ac042f6af2f4

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

scite_

Cited by 5

See all cited by

- Version 1

What does the latest research evidence mean for practitioners who work with gay and bisexual men engaging in chemsex?

Read this article at

Related collections

Italian Studies

Author and article information

Journal

Article

History

Comments

Comment on this article

Similar content 2,989

Cited by 5