15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Corticosteroids for COVID-19: the search for an optimum duration of therapy

      letter
      a , b
      The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine
      Elsevier Ltd.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Michael A Matthay and B Taylor Thompson 1 have very nicely summarised the evidence-based role of dexamethasone in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Their pertinent analysis is based on the background of the RECOVERY trial, 2 which concluded that therapy with dexamethasone at a dose of 6 mg once daily for up to 10 days decreased 28-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 on respiratory support. Patients not requiring oxygen showed no benefit but had a possibility of harm with corticosteroid therapy. 2 One crucial feature of corticosteroid therapy is its duration, particularly in patients with COVID-19 with sustained persistence of ground-glass opacities. Currently, an extended course of corticosteroids beyond 10 days is considered only in select cases of severe COVID-19. 3 One rationale for prolonged treatment is the prevention of post-disease fibrosis in patients with COVID-19 for whom risk factors for pulmonary fibrosis might be established. However, in COVID-19, such a long-lasting course of corticosteroids can inadvertently lead to poor treatment outcomes. The possible effect of steroids in the procoagulant environment of patients with COVID-19, in which even anticoagulant treatment does not sufficiently shield from the thrombotic complications found in deceased patients, should be considered. A hypercoagulable state with profound endothelial injury following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has an essential role in thrombosis. In autopsy studies of patients with COVID-19, diffuse alveolar disruption with large vessel thrombi and microthrombi were seen. 4 Dexamethasone (6 mg per day) tends to increase clotting factor and fibrinogen concentrations. Thus, it is plausible for exogenous glucocorticoids to precipitate clinical thrombosis. 5 In addition, protracted corticosteroid therapy might contribute to the so-called long COVID syndrome that manifests with fatigue and psychological symptoms, in which steroid-related adverse drug reactions such as myopathy, neuromuscular weakness, and psychiatric symptoms might have a part to play.6, 7 Late in the disease course, corticosteroids do not appear to have a role in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Routine use of methylprednisolone for persistent ARDS is not recommended despite improving cardiopulmonary physiology. Even initiating methylprednisolone therapy more than 2 weeks after the onset of ARDS might increase the risk of death. 7 A meta-analysis of 21 350 patients with COVID-19 concluded that overall mortality was greater among patients with the disease who were receiving corticosteroids than among patients who were not treated with corticosteroids. The duration of steroid therapy ranged from 3 to 12 days. 8 The prothrombotic influence of steroids, coupled with their adverse drug reactions, might have contributed to increased mortality. Corticosteroids thus seem to be a double-edged sword in the fight against COVID-19 and need to be used judiciously, considering the risk–benefit ratio, as a short-course (eg, up to 10 days) therapeutic agent in a select group of patients with COVID-19 for whom survival benefit has been reported. There is no evidence supporting long-term use of steroids in patients with COVID-19 to prevent potential adverse sequelae such as pulmonary fibrosis. On the contrary, such an extended course of steroids could be detrimental. © 2021 Tek Image/Science Photo Library 2021 Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 — Preliminary Report

          Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with diffuse lung damage. Glucocorticoids may modulate inflammation-mediated lung injury and thereby reduce progression to respiratory failure and death. Methods In this controlled, open-label trial comparing a range of possible treatments in patients who were hospitalized with Covid-19, we randomly assigned patients to receive oral or intravenous dexamethasone (at a dose of 6 mg once daily) for up to 10 days or to receive usual care alone. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Here, we report the preliminary results of this comparison. Results A total of 2104 patients were assigned to receive dexamethasone and 4321 to receive usual care. Overall, 482 patients (22.9%) in the dexamethasone group and 1110 patients (25.7%) in the usual care group died within 28 days after randomization (age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.93; P<0.001). The proportional and absolute between-group differences in mortality varied considerably according to the level of respiratory support that the patients were receiving at the time of randomization. In the dexamethasone group, the incidence of death was lower than that in the usual care group among patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (29.3% vs. 41.4%; rate ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.81) and among those receiving oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (23.3% vs. 26.2%; rate ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94) but not among those who were receiving no respiratory support at randomization (17.8% vs. 14.0%; rate ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.55). Conclusions In patients hospitalized with Covid-19, the use of dexamethasone resulted in lower 28-day mortality among those who were receiving either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen alone at randomization but not among those receiving no respiratory support. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research and others; RECOVERY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04381936; ISRCTN number, 50189673.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome.

            Persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by excessive fibroproliferation, ongoing inflammation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and a substantial risk of death. Because previous reports suggested that corticosteroids may improve survival, we performed a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of corticosteroids in patients with persistent ARDS. We randomly assigned 180 patients with ARDS of at least seven days' duration to receive either methylprednisolone or placebo in a double-blind fashion. The primary end point was mortality at 60 days. Secondary end points included the number of ventilator-free days and organ-failure-free days, biochemical markers of inflammation and fibroproliferation, and infectious complications. At 60 days, the hospital mortality rate was 28.6 percent in the placebo group (95 percent confidence interval, 20.3 to 38.6 percent) and 29.2 percent in the methylprednisolone group (95 percent confidence interval, 20.8 to 39.4 percent; P=1.0); at 180 days, the rates were 31.9 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 23.2 to 42.0 percent) and 31.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 22.8 to 41.7 percent; P=1.0), respectively. Methylprednisolone was associated with significantly increased 60- and 180-day mortality rates among patients enrolled at least 14 days after the onset of ARDS. Methylprednisolone increased the number of ventilator-free and shock-free days during the first 28 days in association with an improvement in oxygenation, respiratory-system compliance, and blood pressure with fewer days of vasopressor therapy. As compared with placebo, methylprednisolone did not increase the rate of infectious complications but was associated with a higher rate of neuromuscular weakness. These results do not support the routine use of methylprednisolone for persistent ARDS despite the improvement in cardiopulmonary physiology. In addition, starting methylprednisolone therapy more than two weeks after the onset of ARDS may increase the risk of death. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00295269.). Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Autopsy findings in COVID-19-related deaths: a literature review

              Although many clinical reports have been published, little is known about the pathological post-mortem findings from people who have died of the novel coronavirus disease. The need for postmortem information is urgent to improve patient management of mild and severe illness, and treatment strategies. The present systematic review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) standards. A systematic literature search and a critical review of the collected studies were conducted. An electronic search of PubMed, Science Direct Scopus, Google Scholar, and Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) from database inception to June 2020 was performed. We found 28 scientific papers; the total amount of cases is 341. The major histological feature in the lung is diffuse alveolar damage with hyaline membrane formation, alongside microthrombi in small pulmonary vessels. It appears that there is a high incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among COVID-19 decedents, suggesting endothelial involvement, but more studies are needed. A uniform COVID-19 post-mortem diagnostic protocol has not yet been developed. In a time in which international collaboration is essential, standardized diagnostic criteria are fundamental requirements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Lancet Respir Med
                Lancet Respir Med
                The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine
                Elsevier Ltd.
                2213-2600
                2213-2619
                26 November 2020
                January 2021
                26 November 2020
                : 9
                : 1
                : e8
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440018, India
                [b ]Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
                Article
                S2213-2600(20)30530-0
                10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30530-0
                7836750
                33248469
                0b8e866d-a87c-46ba-bfbf-15847ea171e9
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                Categories
                Correspondence

                Comments

                Comment on this article