11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      High-Throughput Identification of Candidate Strains for Biopreservation by Using Bioluminescent Listeria monocytogenes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article describes a method for high-throughput competition assays using a bioluminescent strain of L. monocytogenes. This method is based on the use of the luminescent indicator strain L. monocytogenes EGDe lux. The luminescence of this strain is correlated to growth, which make it suitable to monitor the growth of L. monocytogenes in mixed cultures. To this aim, luminescence kinetics were converted into a single numerical value, called the Luminescence Disturbance Indicator (LDI), which takes into account growth inhibition phenomena resulting in latency increase, decrease in the luminescence rate, or reduction of the maximum luminescence. The LDI allows to automatically and simultaneously handle multiple competition assays which are required for high-throughput screening (HTS) approaches. The method was applied to screen a collection of 1810 strains isolated from raw cow’s milk in order to identify non-acidifying strains with anti- L. monocytogenes bioprotection properties. This method was also successfully used to identify anti- L. monocytogenes candidates within a collection of Lactococcus piscium, a species where antagonism was previously described as non-diffusible and requiring cell-to-cell contact. In conclusion, bioluminescent L. monocytogenes can be used in HTS to identify strains with anti- L. monocytogenes bioprotection properties, irrespectively of the inhibition mechanism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Economic burden from health losses due to foodborne illness in the United States.

          The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently revised their estimates for the annual number of foodborne illnesses; 48 million Americans suffer from domestically acquired foodborne illness associated with 31 identified pathogens and a broad category of unspecified agents. Consequently, economic studies based on the previous estimates are now obsolete. This study was conducted to provide improved and updated estimates of the cost of foodborne illness by adding a replication of the 2011 CDC model to existing cost-of-illness models. The basic cost-of-illness model includes economic estimates for medical costs, productivity losses, and illness-related mortality (based on hedonic value-of-statistical-life studies). The enhanced cost-of-illness model replaces the productivity loss estimates with a more inclusive pain, suffering, and functional disability measure based on monetized quality-adjusted life year estimates. Costs are estimated for each pathogen and a broader class of unknown pathogens. The addition of updated cost data and improvements to methodology enhanced the performance of each existing economic model. Uncertainty in these models was characterized using Monte Carlo simulations in @Risk version 5.5. With this model, the average cost per case of foodborne illness was $1,626 (90% credible interval [CI], $607 to $3,073) for the enhanced cost-of-illness model and $1,068 (90% CI, $683 to $1,646) for the basic model. The resulting aggregated annual cost of illness was $77.7 billion (90% CI, $28.6 to $144.6 billion) and $51.0 billion (90% CI, $31.2 to $76.1 billion) for the enhanced and basic models, respectively.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food‐borne outbreaks in 2015

            (2016)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Contact-dependent inhibition of growth in Escherichia coli.

              Bacteria have developed mechanisms to communicate and compete with each other for limited environmental resources. We found that certain Escherichia coli, including uropathogenic strains, contained a bacterial growth-inhibition system that uses direct cell-to-cell contact. Inhibition was conditional, dependent upon the growth state of the inhibitory cell and the pili expression state of the target cell. Both a large cell-surface protein designated Contact-dependent inhibitor A (CdiA) and two-partner secretion family member CdiB were required for growth inhibition. The CdiAB system may function to regulate the growth of specific cells within a differentiated bacterial population.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Microbiol
                Front Microbiol
                Front. Microbiol.
                Frontiers in Microbiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-302X
                17 August 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1883
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Université de Lorraine, LIBio , Nancy, France
                [2] 2Laboratoire de Biotechnologies Appliquées, EDST, Université Libanaise , Tripoli, Lebanon
                [3] 3Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences and Technology , Islamabad, Pakistan
                [4] 4Laboratoire Ecosystèmes Microbiens et Molécules Marines pour les Biotechnologies, Ifremer , Nantes, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Djamel Drider, Lille University of Science and Technology, France

                Reviewed by: Luis Augusto Nero, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil; Alessandra De Cesare, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Italy

                *Correspondence: Frédéric Borges, frederic.borges@ 123456univ-lorraine.fr

                This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

                Article
                10.3389/fmicb.2018.01883
                6107680
                0ba2b43d-d4eb-4b57-9b26-d2087a083d08
                Copyright © 2018 El Kheir, Cherrat, Awussi, Ramia, Taha, Rahman, Passerini, Leroi, Petit, Mangavel, Revol-Junelles and Borges.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 May 2018
                : 26 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 3, References: 37, Pages: 10, Words: 0
                Categories
                Microbiology
                Methods

                Microbiology & Virology
                biopreservation,listeria monocytogenes,high-throughput screening assays,bioluminescence,competition,mixed culture,bioprotection,antibacterial activities

                Comments

                Comment on this article