1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of Sun’s Ranibizumab Biosimilar in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Phase 3, Double-Blind Comparative Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The study aimed to evaluate comparability in terms of efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of Sun’s ranibizumab biosimilar with reference ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

          Methods

          This prospective, randomised, double-blind, two-group, parallel-arm, multicentre, phase 3 comparative study included patients with nAMD ≥ 50 years, randomised (in a 2:1 ratio) in a double-blind manner to receive 0.5 mg (0.05 mL) intravitreal injection of either Sun’s ranibizumab or reference ranibizumab in the study eye every 4 weeks until week 16 (total of four doses).

          Results

          Primary endpoint results demonstrated equivalence in the proportion of patients who lost fewer than 15 letters from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) to the end of week 16 (99% of patients in Sun’s ranibizumab and 100% in reference ranibizumab; p > 0.9999), with the proportional difference (90% confidence interval) at −1% (−2.51, +0.61) lying within a pre-specified equivalence margin. Visual acuity improved by 15 or more letters in 43% of Sun’s ranibizumab group and 37% of the reference ranibizumab group ( p = 0.4267). The mean increase in BCVA was 15.7 letters in Sun’s ranibizumab group and 14.6 letters in the reference ranibizumab group ( p < 0.001 within both groups and p = 0.5275 between groups). The mean change in central macular thickness was comparable between groups ( p = 0.7946). Anti-ranibizumab antibodies were found in one patient of the reference ranibizumab group, while neutralising antibodies were not found in any patients. Both products were well tolerated.

          Conclusion

          Sun’s ranibizumab biosimilar is found to be therapeutically equivalent to reference ranibizumab in patients with nAMD. There were no additional safety or immunogenicity concerns.

          Trial Registration

          CTRI/2020/09/027629, registered on 07 September 2020.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-024-00883-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

          Numerous population-based studies of age-related macular degeneration have been reported around the world, with the results of some studies suggesting racial or ethnic differences in disease prevalence. Integrating these resources to provide summarised data to establish worldwide prevalence and to project the number of people with age-related macular degeneration from 2020 to 2040 would be a useful guide for global strategies. We did a systematic literature review to identify all population-based studies of age-related macular degeneration published before May, 2013. Only studies using retinal photographs and standardised grading classifications (the Wisconsin age-related maculopathy grading system, the international classification for age-related macular degeneration, or the Rotterdam staging system) were included. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches were used to estimate the pooled prevalence, the 95% credible intervals (CrI), and to examine the difference in prevalence by ethnicity (European, African, Hispanic, Asian) and region (Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, North America, and Oceania). UN World Population Prospects were used to project the number of people affected in 2014 and 2040. Bayes factor was calculated as a measure of statistical evidence, with a score above three indicating substantial evidence. Analysis of 129,664 individuals (aged 30-97 years), with 12,727 cases from 39 studies, showed the pooled prevalence (mapped to an age range of 45-85 years) of early, late, and any age-related macular degeneration to be 8.01% (95% CrI 3.98-15.49), 0.37% (0.18-0.77), and 8.69% (4.26-17.40), respectively. We found a higher prevalence of early and any age-related macular degeneration in Europeans than in Asians (early: 11.2% vs 6.8%, Bayes factor 3.9; any: 12.3% vs 7.4%, Bayes factor 4.3), and early, late, and any age-related macular degeneration to be more prevalent in Europeans than in Africans (early: 11.2% vs 7.1%, Bayes factor 12.2; late: 0.5% vs 0.3%, 3.7; any: 12.3% vs 7.5%, 31.3). There was no difference in prevalence between Asians and Africans (all Bayes factors <1). Europeans had a higher prevalence of geographic atrophy subtype (1.11%, 95% CrI 0.53-2.08) than Africans (0.14%, 0.04-0.45), Asians (0.21%, 0.04-0.87), and Hispanics (0.16%, 0.05-0.46). Between geographical regions, cases of early and any age-related macular degeneration were less prevalent in Asia than in Europe and North America (early: 6.3% vs 14.3% and 12.8% [Bayes factor 2.3 and 7.6]; any: 6.9% vs 18.3% and 14.3% [3.0 and 3.8]). No significant gender effect was noted in prevalence (Bayes factor <1.0). The projected number of people with age-related macular degeneration in 2020 is 196 million (95% CrI 140-261), increasing to 288 million in 2040 (205-399). These estimates indicate the substantial global burden of age-related macular degeneration. Summarised data provide information for understanding the effect of the condition and provide data towards designing eye-care strategies and health services around the world. National Medical Research Council, Singapore. Copyright © 2014 Wong et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND. Published by .. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

            Clinical trials have established the efficacy of ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In addition, bevacizumab is used off-label to treat AMD, despite the absence of similar supporting data. In a multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 1208 patients with neovascular AMD to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab on either a monthly schedule or as needed with monthly evaluation. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity at 1 year, with a noninferiority limit of 5 letters on the eye chart. Bevacizumab administered monthly was equivalent to ranibizumab administered monthly, with 8.0 and 8.5 letters gained, respectively. Bevacizumab administered as needed was equivalent to ranibizumab as needed, with 5.9 and 6.8 letters gained, respectively. Ranibizumab as needed was equivalent to monthly ranibizumab, although the comparison between bevacizumab as needed and monthly bevacizumab was inconclusive. The mean decrease in central retinal thickness was greater in the ranibizumab-monthly group (196 μm) than in the other groups (152 to 168 μm, P=0.03 by analysis of variance). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were similar for patients receiving either bevacizumab or ranibizumab (P>0.20). The proportion of patients with serious systemic adverse events (primarily hospitalizations) was higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab (24.1% vs. 19.0%; risk ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.66), with excess events broadly distributed in disease categories not identified in previous studies as areas of concern. At 1 year, bevacizumab and ranibizumab had equivalent effects on visual acuity when administered according to the same schedule. Ranibizumab given as needed with monthly evaluation had effects on vision that were equivalent to those of ranibizumab administered monthly. Differences in rates of serious adverse events require further study. (Funded by the National Eye Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00593450.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Safety and efficacy of a flexible dosing regimen of ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the SUSTAIN study.

              To evaluate the safety and efficacy of individualized ranibizumab treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Twelve-month, phase III, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. A total of 513 ranibizumab-naïve SUSTAIN patients. Three initial monthly injections of ranibizumab (0.3 mg) and thereafter pro re nata (PRN) retreatment for 9 months based on prespecified retreatment criteria. Patients switched to 0.5 mg ranibizumab after approval in Europe. Frequency of adverse events (AEs), monthly change of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) from baseline, the time to first re-treatment, and the number of treatments were assessed. A total of 249 patients (48.5%) reported ocular AEs, and 8 (1.5%) deaths, 5 (1.2%) patients with ocular serious AEs of the study eye (retinal hemorrhage, cataract, retinal pigment epithelial tear, reduced visual acuity [VA], vitreous hemorrhage), and 19 (3.7%) patients with arteriothromboembolic events were observed. Most frequent AEs in the study eye were reduced VA (18.5%), retinal hemorrhage (7.2%), increased intraocular pressure (7.0%), and conjunctival hemorrhage (5.5%). The average number of re-treatments from months 3 to 11 was 2.7. Mean best-corrected visual acuity increased steadily from baseline to month 3 to reach +5.8 letters, decreased slightly from month 3 to 6, and remained stable from month 6 to 12, reaching +3.6 at month 12. Mean change in CRT was -101.1 μm from baseline to month 3 and -91.5 μm from baseline to month 12. The safety results are comparable to the favorable tolerability profile of ranibizumab observed in previous pivotal clinical studies; individualized treatment with less than monthly re-treatments shows a similar safety profile as observed in previous randomized clinical trials with monthly ranibizumab treatment. Efficacy outcomes were achieved with a low average number of re-treatments. Visual acuity in SUSTAIN patients with individualized re-treatment based on VA/optical coherence tomography assessment reached on average a maximum after the first 3 monthly injections, decreased slightly under PRN during the next 2 to 3 months, and was then sustained throughout the treatment period. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Mandodari.Rajurkar@sunpharma.com
                Journal
                Ophthalmol Ther
                Ophthalmol Ther
                Ophthalmology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8245
                2193-6528
                26 March 2024
                26 March 2024
                May 2024
                : 13
                : 5
                : 1369-1382
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.413204.0, ISNI 0000 0004 1768 2335, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, ; Kolkata, India
                [2 ]GRID grid.452248.d, ISNI 0000 0004 1766 9915, B. J. Govt. Medical College and Sassoon General Hospital, ; Pune, India
                [3 ]Lotus Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
                [4 ]Chopda Medicare & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd, Nashik, India
                [5 ]Sankat Mochan Nethralaya and Dental Care, Varanasi, India
                [6 ]JPM Rotary Club of Cuttack Eye Hospital & Research Institute, Cuttack, India
                [7 ]L V Prasad Eye Institute, ( https://ror.org/01w8z9742) Vijayawada, India
                [8 ]Pagarav Hospital, Gandhinagar, India
                [9 ]GRID grid.416065.0, SMS Hospital, ; Jaipur, India
                [10 ]Aravind Eye Hospital, ( https://ror.org/05vg07g77) Coimbatore, India
                [11 ]Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, ( https://ror.org/05ahcwz21) Kochi, India
                [12 ]L V Prasad Eye Institute, ( https://ror.org/01w8z9742) Bhubaneswar, India
                [13 ]King George’s Medical University, ( https://ror.org/00gvw6327) Lucknow, India
                [14 ]GRID grid.507567.6, Sankara Eye Hospital, ; Bangalore, India
                [15 ]L V Prasad Eye Institute, ( https://ror.org/01w8z9742) Hyderabad, India
                [16 ]Department of Ophthalmology, GSVM Medical College, ( https://ror.org/002ztb251) Kanpur, India
                [17 ]Saswade Netra Rugnalay and Omkar Lasik Laser Centre, Aurangabad, India
                [18 ]Diva Eye Institute, Ahmedabad, India
                [19 ]Aravind Eye Hospital & Postgraduate Institute of Opthalmology, ( https://ror.org/05vg07g77) Coimbatore, India
                [20 ]KLEs Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital & MRC, Belagavi, India
                [21 ]GRID grid.418931.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1766 8920, India Clinical Research, , Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, Sun House, ; Plot Number 201 B/1, Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai, 400063 India
                [22 ]GRID grid.418931.6, ISNI 0000 0004 1766 8920, Ex Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, ; Mumbai, India
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-0545
                Article
                883
                10.1007/s40123-024-00883-5
                11039601
                38530568
                0c6f1d88-97d6-4ca6-b6b2-da8289ab34af
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 5 December 2023
                : 4 January 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013671, Sun Pharma;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                biosimilar ranibizumab,innovator ranibizumab,neovascular age-related macular degeneration,anti-vegf

                Comments

                Comment on this article