10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Citrullinated peptide dendritic cell immunotherapy in HLA risk genotype-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In animals, immunomodulatory dendritic cells (DCs) exposed to autoantigen can suppress experimental arthritis in an antigen-specific manner. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), disease-specific anti-citrullinated peptide autoantibodies (ACPA or anti-CCP) are found in the serum of about 70% of RA patients and are strongly associated with HLA-DRB1 risk alleles. This study aimed to explore the safety and biological and clinical effects of autologous DCs modified with a nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) inhibitor exposed to four citrullinated peptide antigens, designated "Rheumavax," in a single-center, open-labeled, first-in-human phase 1 trial. Rheumavax was administered once intradermally at two progressive dose levels to 18 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) risk genotype-positive RA patients with citrullinated peptide-specific autoimmunity. Sixteen RA patients served as controls. Rheumavax was well tolerated: adverse events were grade 1 (of 4) severity. At 1 month after treatment, we observed a reduction in effector T cells and an increased ratio of regulatory to effector T cells; a reduction in serum interleukin-15 (IL-15), IL-29, CX3CL1, and CXCL11; and reduced T cell IL-6 responses to vimentin(447-455)-Cit450 relative to controls. Rheumavax did not induce disease flares in patients recruited with minimal disease activity, and DAS28 decreased within 1 month in Rheumavax-treated patients with active disease. This exploratory study demonstrates safety and biological activity of a single intradermal injection of autologous modified DCs exposed to citrullinated peptides, and provides rationale for further studies to assess clinical efficacy and antigen-specific effects of autoantigen immunomodulatory therapy in RA.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Compromised Function of Regulatory T Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Reversal by Anti-TNFα Therapy

          Regulatory T cells have been clearly implicated in the control of disease in murine models of autoimmunity. The paucity of data regarding the role of these lymphocytes in human autoimmune disease has prompted us to examine their function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Regulatory (CD4+CD25+) T cells isolated from patients with active RA displayed an anergic phenotype upon stimulation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies, and suppressed the proliferation of effector T cells in vitro. However, they were unable to suppress proinflammatory cytokine secretion from activated T cells and monocytes, or to convey a suppressive phenotype to effector CD4+CD25− T cells. Treatment with antitumor necrosis factor α (TNFα; Infliximab) restored the capacity of regulatory T cells to inhibit cytokine production and to convey a suppressive phenotype to “conventional” T cells. Furthermore, anti-TNFα treatment led to a significant rise in the number of peripheral blood regulatory T cells in RA patients responding to this treatment, which correlated with a reduction in C reactive protein. These data are the first to demonstrate that regulatory T cells are functionally compromised in RA, and indicate that modulation of regulatory T cells by anti-TNFα therapy may be a further mechanism by which this disease is ameliorated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The shared epitope hypothesis. an approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A molecular basis for the association of the HLA-DRB1 locus, citrullination, and rheumatoid arthritis

              The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus plays a vital role in immunity; it encodes highly polymorphic molecules that present peptides to T lymphocytes, where HLA polymorphisms serve to broaden the repertoire of peptides that different HLA allotypes can bind. Many T cell–mediated autoimmune diseases are linked to the expression of particular HLA molecules. For example, certain HLA-class I allotypes are associated with inflammatory diseases (Bharadwaj et al., 2012). Moreover, strong HLA-I associations are present with certain drug hypersensitivity reactions (Illing et al., 2012). HLA-class II allele associations with autoimmune diseases are much more common than HLA-I associations, but there are few examples in which the mechanism is well understood (Jones et al., 2006; Henderson et al., 2007). The HLA-II molecules are encoded by the highly polymorphic HLA-DR, DQ, and DP loci. The polymorphisms are found largely within the antigen-binding pocket of these molecules, but in HLA-DR they are confined to the DRβ chain (DRB1, 3, 4, and 5 genes) with the DRα chain being essentially monomorphic. Notwithstanding some HLA disease associations, little is known about the nature of the HLA-bound self-peptides that are involved in autoimmunity, limiting development of specific immune intervention strategies aimed to inhibit or prevent such deleterious immune responses. Nevertheless, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is arguably one of the best-described systems for understanding the genetic association between HLA-II alleles, autoimmunity, and self-peptide presentation (Raychaudhuri et al., 2012; Viatte et al., 2013). RA is a systemic autoimmune diseases, afflicting ∼1% of the population (Helmick et al., 2008). RA is characterized by inflammation of synovial tissues in the joints, pannus formation, and erosion of the bones (Klareskog et al., 2009). Like most human autoimmune diseases, multiple genes contribute to RA susceptibility and severity (Viatte et al., 2013). The most comprehensive genetic association exists with HLA-DRB1 genes and in particular the HLA-DR4 alleles. Specifically, the association has been mapped to a highly polymorphic N-terminal region of the HLA DRβ chain around positions 70–74 (Viatte et al., 2013). This region encodes a conserved positively charged residue at position 71 that is thought to dictate the nature of the amino acid that is accommodated in the P4 pocket of the antigen-binding groove (Hammer et al., 1995). Alleles having this shared conserved region of the DRβ 70–74 region are termed to have a shared susceptibility epitope (SE; Gregersen et al., 1987) and include the commonly occurring HLA DRB1*04:01, *04:04, and *01:01 molecules. Recently, a large haplotype association study involving >5,000 seropositive RA patients and 15,000 controls has attributed most of the DR-associated risk to positions 11, 13, 71, and 74 of the HLA-DRβ1 polypeptide chain encoded by SE alleles (Raychaudhuri et al., 2012), strongly suggesting that this allotype permits binding and presentation of autoantigenic peptides. In addition, HLA-DRB1*04 + individuals had accelerated CD4+ T cell telomere erosion and immunosenescence commencing early in life, relative to HLA-DRB1*04 − individuals, regardless of the development of RA (Schönland et al., 2003). However, the molecular basis for the RA association with the SE remains unclear. Citrullination, the conversion of arginine to citrulline, is a physiological process catalyzed by peptidyl arginine deiminases (PAD; Vossenaar and van Venrooij, 2004). This process is increased during inflammation, stress, and apoptosis, and expands the repertoire of presented epitopes after protein immunization (Klareskog et al., 2008). Citrullinated proteins and PAD (arising from inflammatory cells) are found in RA patient synovium (Vossenaar et al., 2004; Foulquier et al., 2007) and in RA- and non–RA-associated pneumonia (Bongartz et al., 2007). Moreover, expression of citrullinated proteins is up-regulated in the lung epithelial cells of healthy smokers relative to nonsmokers (Makrygiannakis et al., 2008). Consistent with this observation, smoking increases the risk of developing anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive RA, particularly in SE+ individuals (Padyukov et al., 2004; Klareskog et al., 2008). Numerous citrullinated autoantigens, of which most are ubiquitous proteins, have been identified in RA (Hill et al., 2003, 2008; Vossenaar et al., 2004; Vossenaar and van Venrooij, 2004; Klareskog et al., 2008; Law et al., 2012), with some showing cross reactivity with microbial antigens (Lundberg et al., 2008). Indeed, autoantibodies specific for citrullinated antigens are found in the serum of RA patients and are highly specific to the disease (van Gaalen et al., 2004; Klareskog et al., 2008; Klareskog et al., 2009). Over the last decade, this observation has led to a rapid clinical translation and adoption of ACPA reactivity as an important diagnostic tool, including the prediction of more erosive outcomes in RA (Klareskog et al., 2009; Klareskog et al., 2008; van Gaalen et al., 2004). ACPA may directly influence joint inflammation and erosion through local binding of citrullinated proteins (Kuhn et al., 2006; Harre et al., 2012). Moreover, HLA-DRB1 susceptibility alleles are strongly associated with ACPA-positive RA, strengthening the conclusion that the HLA-SE molecules restrict antigen presentation of citrullinated autoantigens (Huizinga et al., 2005; Klareskog et al., 2008, 2009; van Gaalen et al., 2004). However, despite the clinical utility of elucidating autoantibody responses toward them, the precise role of citrullinated antigens in the initiation and/or progression of RA has remained elusive. RESULTS Structural basis of citrullinated epitopes presentation Several citrullinated (cit) epitopes, including vimentin59-71 (GVYATR/citSSAVR/citLR/cit; Snir et al., 2011), vimentin66-78 (SAVRAR/citSSVPGVR; Hill et al., 2003; Law et al., 2012), fibrinogen-α79-91 (QDFTNR/citINKLKNS; Hill et al., 2008; Law et al., 2012), and aggrecan84-103 (VVLLVATEGR/CitVRVNSAYQDK; Law et al., 2012; von Delwig et al., 2010) are associated with ACPA+ RA and the SE-encoded HLA alleles. To establish the basis of citrullination-dependent binding to the SE-HLA allomorphs (Fig. 1, a and b), we determined the high resolution structures of HLA-DRB1*04:01 complexed to vimentin59-71 epitopes that were citrullinated at position 64 (vimentin-64Cit59-71), as well as at positions 64, 69, and 71 (vimentin-64-69-71Cit59-71); the vimentin66-78 epitope that was citrullinated at position 71 (vimentin-71Cit66-78); and the aggrecan89-103 epitope that was citrullinated at positions 93 and 95 (aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103). This provided a broad perspective of how citrullination of epitopes enables HLA-DRB1*04:01 binding (Fig. 1; Fig. 2, a–c; and Table 1). The citrullinated epitopes were located within the Ag-binding cleft of HLA-DRB1*04:01, and all four structures adopted a very similar conformation and were similar to previously determined HLA-DR4 structures that bound noncitrullinated antigens (Dessen et al., 1997; Fig. 1, c and d; and Fig. 2, a–c). The vimentin-71Cit66-78 epitope bound in a linear, extended manner with P1-Val, P4-Cit, P6-Ser, and P9-Gly occupying the P1, P4, P6, and P9 pockets of HLA-DRB1*04:01, respectively, whereas P2-Arg, P5-Ser, P7-Val, P8-Pro, and P11-Arg represented potential TCR contact sites (Fig. 1 c). The P4-Cit bent back upon itself and adopted a constrained U-shaped conformation in which its aliphatic moiety packed against Phe26β, Tyr78β, and His13β of HLA-DRB1*04:01 (Fig. 3 a). Of the residues within the SE, positions 72 and 73 pointed away from the P4 pocket, whereas position 74 was orientated toward the pocket, packing against Phe26β, yet did not contact the P4-Cit. The citrullinated head group formed a direct H-bond to Lys71βNZ, the latter of which was stabilized by a salt bridge to Asp28β, and an H-bond to P5-SerO (Fig. 3 a). A P4-Arg could not be accommodated within this P4 pocket, as Lys71β would electrostatically repel the positively charged guanidinium head group and, moreover, there is insufficient space surrounding the P4 pocket to enable Lys71β or P4-Arg to adopt differing conformations, which is consistent with the peptide elution data (discussed below). Although there were some sequence differences between the vimentin59-71 and vimentin66-78 epitopes, which related to differing anchor residue interactions at the P1 (Val → Tyr) and P9 pockets (Gly → Arg; Fig. 2 a), the P4-Cit residues adopted essentially identical interactions within the P4 pocket (Fig. 3 b). Moreover, in the vimentin-64-69-71Cit59-71 epitope, the P4-Cit adopted a very similar conformation to that observed in the vimentin-64Cit59-71 epitope (Fig. 2 b and Fig. 3 c). While the C-terminally located P11-Cit of vimentin-64-69-71Cit59-71 was solvent exposed and mobile, the P9-Cit occupied the P9 pocket of HLA-DRB1*04:01 (Fig. 2 b). Here, the P9 pocket seemed equally well suited to accommodate P9-Arg or P9-Cit, with Tyr37β H-bonding to both moieties (not depicted). The ready accommodation of P9-Arg/P9-Cit within the P9 pocket was consistent with the similar thermal stability values for HLA-DRB1*04:01–vimentin-64Cit59-71 and HLA-DRB1*04:01-vimentin-64-69-71Cit59-71 (Tm of 66.7°C and 69.1°C, respectively; Table 2). The structure of the HLA-DRB1*04:01–aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103 complex showed that the positioning of the P4-Cit, and the immediate environment of the P4 pocket, was very similar to that of the HLA-DRB1*04:01–vimentin complexes, despite the differing hydrogen bonding network with Lys71β (Fig. 2 c and Fig. 3 d). In the HLA-DRB1*04:01–aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103 complex, the P2-Cit was highly solvent exposed (Fig. 2 c and Fig. 3 d), suggesting that citrullination of this position could potentially impact on TCR recognition. Hence, the P4 pocket of HLA-DRB1*04:01 was highly suited to preferentially accommodate citrulline over the corresponding Arg residue, with Lys71β of the SE playing a key discriminatory role. Figure 1. HLA-DRB1*04:01 in complex with Vimentin-71Cit66-78. (a) Polymorphic residues involved in susceptibility to RA. The peptide-binding groove of an HLA-DR molecule is shown in cartoon representation with the α-chain colored in green and the β-chain colored in pink. Residues Val11β, His13β, Lys71β, and Ala74β are represented as sticks and correspond to the residues present in HLA-DR401, the HLA with the highest risk associated with RA. (b) Sequence alignment of the three HLA-DRB1*04 alleles used in this study showing amino acid polymorphisms. “-” indicates residue conserved with that of HLA-DRB1*04:01:01. Val11β, His13β are conserved in all three alleles (not depicted). (c) HLA-DRB1*04:01 in complex with vimentin-71Cit66-78. The vimentin-71Cit66-78 peptide is bound in the peptide-binding groove, with carbons colored in yellow, nitrogens colored in blue, and oxygens colored in red. The α and β chains are shown in cartoon representation, and colored in green and pink, respectively. (d) Side view of the bound vimentin-71Cit66-78 peptide. The peptide’s 2Fo-Fc electron density map is shown in blue and contoured to 1 σ, showing unambiguous density for the peptide. Peptide residues are labeled and numbered, with Citrulline71 occupying the P4 pocket. Figure 2. Side view of epitopes bound to HLA-DR4. (a) HLA-DRB1*04:01 bound to vimentin-64Cit59-71. (b) HLA-DRB1*04:01 bound to vimentin-64-69-71Cit59-71. (c) HLA-DRB1*04:01 bound to aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103. (d) HLA-DRB1*04:04 bound to vimentin-71Cit59-71. (e) HLA-DRB1*04:02 bound to vimentin-71Cit66-78. (f) HLA-DRB1*04:02 bound to Vimentin66-78. The peptide’s 2Fo-Fc electron density map is shown in blue and contoured to 1 σ. Peptide residues are labeled and numbered. Table 1. Data collection and refinement statistics DR401Vim-71Cit66-78 DR401Vim-64Cit59-71 DR401Vim-64-69-71Cit59-71 DR401Agg-93-95Cit89-103 DR402Vim66-78 DR402Vim-71Cit66-78 DR404Vim-71Cit66-78 Space group C2221 C2221 C2221 C2221 C2221 C2221 C2221 Cell dimensions a,b,c (Å) 67.9, 177.8, 76.7 67.1, 183.4, 77.3 67.2, 183.6, 77.4 67.1, 182.5, 77.5 66.4, 182.5, 77.81 67.0, 182.9, 77.4 67.4, 183.0, 77.5 Resolution (Å) 62.73-2.30 (2.42-2.30) 48.84-2.41 (2.54-2.41) 91.26-2.20 (2.32-2.20) 62.97-1.95 (2.06-1.95) 62.43-1.70 (1.79-1.70) 62.93-2.0 (2.11-2.0) 45.75-1.65 (1.74-1.65) Total no. observations 120743 (17589) 88651 (13122) 109458 (16044) 222923 (18256) 334634 (49187) 228336 (33111) 415853 (59544) No. unique observations 20836 (2991) 18858 (2717) 23984 (3509) 34301 (4325) 52300 (7557) 32616 (4690) 58009 (8355) Multiplicity 5.8 (5.9) 4.7 (4.8) 4.6 (4.6) 6.5 (4.2) 6.4 (6.5) 7.0 (7.1) 7.2 (7.1) Rmerge 14.7 (49.5) 15.8 (49.3) 15.5 (60) 12.2 (45.7) 10.5 (58.8) 12.2 (49.7) 10.0 (47.2) Rpim a 6.7 (22.3) 8.2 (25.4) 8 (31.2) 5.1 (24.4) 4.4 (24.3) 5 (20.1) 4.0 (18.9) 9.5 (3.4) 7.3 (3.0) 7.6 (2.6) 11.3 (2.6) 12.3 (2.9) 12.5 (3.5) 10.6 (3.3) Completeness (%) 100 (100) 99.9 (100) 97.5 (98.3) 97.5 (85.8) 99.8 (99.8) 100 (100) 100 (100) Refinement Statistics Non-hydrogen atoms 3500 3428 3603 3728 3833 3672 3866 Protein 3145 3136 3152 3168 3238 3204 3291 Water 292 239 354 470 535 397 466 Ligand 61 53 97 90 60 71 109 Rfactor/Rfree b c 17.8/22.0 18.9/23.1 17.1/20.7 16.5/20.9 16.2/18.8 16.1/20.3 16.3/18.6 Rms deviations from ideality Bond lengths (Å) 0.0049 0.0034 0.0075 0.0062 0.0046 0.007 0.0053 Bond angles (°) 1.015 1.018 1.341 1.059 1.035 1.113 1.03 Dihedrals (°) 14.1 14.3 14.7 13.9 15.2 16.1 14.5 Ramachandran plot Favored regions (%) 98.4 98.1 97.9 98.7 99 98.2 98.2 Allowed regions (%) 1.6 1.9 2.1 1.3 1 1.8 1.8 a Rp.i.m = Σhkl [1/(N − 1)]1/2 Σi | Ihkl, i − | / Σhkl b Rfactor = (Σ | |Fo| − |Fc| |) / (Σ |Fo|) − for all data except as indicated in footnote c. c 5% of data were used for the Rfree calculation. Values in parentheses refer to the highest resolution bin. Figure 3. Interactions with citrulline in the P4 pocket of HLA-DRB1*04:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:04. (a) Vimentin-71Cit66-78 colored in yellow, (b) vimentin-64Cit59-71 colored in pink, (c) vimentin-64-69-71Cit59-71 colored in green, and (d) aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103 (colored in blue, bound to HLA-DRB1 *04:01). Residues from the β chain important for contacts with the P4 citrulline are represented as sticks. (e) Vimentin-71Cit66-78 colored in teal bound to HLA-DRB1*04:04. Table 2. Thermostability data Sample Tm (°C) DR401CLIP 63.0 ± 0.99 DR401Vim-64Cit59-71 66.7 ± 1.64 DR401Vim-64-69-71Cit59-71 69.1 ± 0.58 DR401Vim-71Cit66-78 58.9 ± 2.17 DR401Agg-93-95Cit89-103 64.2 ± 0.87 DR402CLIP 76.8 ± 1.24 DR402Vim66-78 77.1 ± 0.47 DR402Vim-71Cit66-78 84.3 ± 2.71 DR404CLIP 73.5 ± 0.41 DR404Vim-71Cit66-78 83.0 ± 0.92 HLA DRβ polymorphisms and RA susceptibility HLA DRβ polymorphisms are closely associated with RA disease susceptibility (Raychaudhuri et al., 2012; Viatte et al., 2013). For example, although the HLA-DRB1*04:01 allele is strongly associated with RA susceptibility (odds ratio [OR] 4.44), HLA-DRB1*04:08, *04:05, *04:04, and *10:01 allomorphs are, by comparison, marginally less associated (OR > 4.22), whereas allomorphs such as HLA-DRB1*04:02 and *13:01 are considered RA resistant/protective (OR 1.43 and 0.59, respectively; van der Woude et al., 2010; Raychaudhuri et al., 2012; Viatte et al., 2013). These differing associations are associated with polymorphic differences mapping to positions 11, 13, 71, and 74 (Fig. 1, a and b; Raychaudhuri et al., 2012; Viatte et al., 2013). To establish the differing hierarchies of RA disease susceptibility, we determined the structures of HLA-DRB1*04:04 and HLA-DRB1*04:02 in complex with vimentin-Cit7166-78 (Fig. 2, d and e; and Table 1). HLA-DRB1*04:01 differs from HLA-DRB1*04:04 by 2 aa, of which a K→ R polymorphism maps to position 71. Thus, the P4 pocket remains positively charged within HLA-DRB1*04:04, thereby disfavoring P4-Arg at this position. The P4-Cit of vimentin-71Cit66-78 in DRB1*04:04 occupied a similar position to that observed in HLA-DRB1*04:01, but was in a more extended conformation (Fig. 3 e). Instead P4-Cit pointed toward and directly contacted Gln70β and Ala74β and H-bonded to Arg71β of HLA-DRB1*04:04, the latter of which occupied a very similar position to Lys71β (Fig. 3 e). Thus, the similarity of the P4 pockets of HLA-DRB1*04:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:04 provided a basis for the similar disease association of these allomorphs. The disease-associated effect of the polymorphisms at positions 11 and 13 in the DRβ chain is less clear. Position 11 resides within the P6 pocket, packing against His13β, the latter of which formed van der Waals contacts with the aliphatic moiety of P4-Cit. Therefore, a His13βSer polymorphism, as observed in the protective HLA-DRB*13:01 allomorph (Raychaudhuri et al., 2012; Viatte et al., 2013) is likely to impact the packing of the P4 residue. Regardless, a key difference between the HLA-DRB1*04:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:02 allomorphs is that the latter possesses Asp70β and Glu71β, which enabled it to bind P4-Arg and P4-Cit (Tm of 77.1°C and 84.3°C, respectively; Table 2). Accordingly, we determined the structures of HLA-DRB1*04:02 in complex with Vimentin-71Cit66-78 and Vimentin66-78 (Fig. 2, e and f). The presence of Glu71β, which caused a slight adjustment of neighboring residues in comparison to the HLA-DRB1*04:01 complex, enabled a direct H-bond and salt bridge to be formed with P4-Cit and P4-Arg, respectively (Fig. 4, a and b). In addition, Asp70β reoriented to form a salt bridge with P4-Arg. Hence, P4-Arg can be readily accommodated in some of the RA-protective HLA-DRB1 allomorphs due to the conversion toward a more electronegative P4 pocket (Fig. 4, c and d). Figure 4. Comparison of the interactions between citrulline and arginine in the P4 pocket of HLA-DRB1*04:02. (a) Vimentin-71Cit66-78 colored in green; (b) Vimentin66-78 colored in purple. The solvent-accessible electrostatic potential was calculated for panel c HLA-DRB1*04:01 and (d) HLA-DRB1*04:02 bound to vimentin-71Cit66-78. Electrostatic calculations were performed using APBS (±12 kT/e). Antigen processing and HLA-DR4 peptide repertoire To examine the propensity of the differentially RA-associated HLA-DR4 alleles to tolerate P4-Arg residues, we generated T2 cell lines (class II–deficient) that expressed HLA-DM and HLA-DRB1*04:01, *04:02, or *04:04. Accordingly, in contrast to previous studies on HLA-DR4-binding motifs (Hammer et al., 1993; Sette et al., 1993; Hammer et al., 1995), our data arises from a large number of novel naturally processed and presented peptides identified, using a common platform, from cells that express a single HLA-DR molecule that sample peptides from the same parental cell proteome. Our approach enabled an in-depth analysis of the repertoire of peptides bound to each HLA-DR allele. Over 1000 high confidence peptides were identified for each DR allele, elucidating HLA-II binding motifs for HLA-DRB1*04:01 (n = 1058), HLA-DRB1*04:04 (n = 1797) and HLA-DRB1*04:02 (n = 1239). These endogenous peptide sequences determined from multiple peptide elution experiments were identified with high confidence using strict bioinformatic criteria that included the removal of common contaminants (Dudek et al., 2012). The motifs generated using this approach were in general agreement with previously determined motifs (Hammer et al., 1995; Sette et al., 1993), specifically exhibiting significantly different specificities at P1 and P4 (Fig. 5 a). Namely, whereas P4-Arg was absent in all the peptides bound to HLA-DRB1*04:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:04, arginine for HLA-DRB1*04:02-bound peptides was better tolerated in this position (Fig. 5 a). These data are consistent with HLA-DRB1*04:01/04 disfavoring P4-Arg in vitro (Fig. 3) and not being selected at all in vivo (Fig. 5 a). In contrast HLA-DRB1*04:02 has a propensity to bind P4-Arg in vitro (Fig. 4 b) and is permissive to P4-Arg containing peptides in vivo (Fig. 5 a) with 1.7% of naturally selected peptides containing a P4-Arg. In addition to satisfying the binding requirements to HLA-DRB1*04:01 and other RA-associated HLA-DR allotypes, we hypothesized that differential processing of citrullinated peptides may also contribute to their antigenicity. To establish this, we expressed recombinant vimentin and citrullinated it using the PAD2 enzyme. We compared in vitro cathepsin L digestion patterns of native and citrullinated vimentin and observed relative protection of the vimentin59-71 epitope when the antigen was citrullinated at positions 64, 69 and 71 (Fig. 5 b). Similar differences in cleavage patterns were observed using synthetic peptides encompassing the native and citrullinated vimentin 57–71 region (not shown). This suggests that citrullination not only facilitates binding of autoantigenic epitopes to RA-associated HLA allotypes but that the modification of arginine residues also alters protease cleavage patterns protecting regions of the antigen normally degraded in APCs. Thus, citrullination has a double-edged effect, both permitting SE binding and preventing degradation of posttranslationally modified epitopes that can be presented to autoreactive T cells in the context of the SE. Figure 5. HLA-DRB1*04 binding motifs and protease sensitivity of citrullinated epitopes. (a) HLA Binding motifs of DRB1*04:01, DRB1*04:02 and DRB1*04:04 were generated from immunoaffinity purified allotypes isolated from T2-DRB1*04:01, 04:02 and 04:04 cells expressing DM. Each HLA DR allotype was affinity purified, and bound peptides were isolated and analyzed by Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). To generate peptide-binding motifs, the minimal core sequences found within nested sets were extracted and the resulting list of peptides aligned and visualized using Icelogo. Positively associated residues (P > 0.05) at each relative position are shown above the x-axis and negatively associated residues are shown below. Residues height is proportionate to prevalence, with residues shown in pink having infinite height reflecting absolute presence or absence at that position in the bound peptides. (b) Citrullination alters cleavage of vimentin by Cathepsin L. Recombinant human vimentin was citrullinated in vitro, and the Cathepsin L digestion patterns of native and citrullinated vimentin were observed by LC-MS/MS. Observed cleavages are highlighted by arrows in the region of vimentin-spanning residues 51–81. The amount of selected peptides (as determined by area under the curve quantitation for extracted ion chromatograms) from this region that span the immunogenic 59–71 region of vimentin are shown as a function of digestion time (1, 5, 3, and 60 min digests). Ex vivo T cell analysis using HLA DR4 tetramers Next, we aimed to identify circulating citrullinated epitope-specific CD4+ T cells. We recruited 20 HLA-DRB1*04:01 + RA patients and 6 HLA-matched healthy controls, with the RA patients possessing a range of disease durations, disease activity, and treatments (Table 3). We generated phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled HLA-DRB1*04:01 tetramers complexed with either: control influenza hemagglutinin (HA)306-318, vimentin-64Cit59-71, or aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103 peptides. We demonstrated that gating based on PE fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) staining reliably gates HA-specific T cells in immunized mice without background in saline-treated mice (unpublished data), and then showed specificity of the T cells using tetramers labeled with different fluorochromes (Tung et al., 2007; Fig. 6 a and not depicted). Although we determined the median absolute number of CD4+ T cells to be 7 × 104 in healthy controls and 10.2 × 104/ml blood in RA patients, the median number of HA, cit-vimentin, or cit-aggrecan HLA-DRB1*04:01 tetramer+ cells ranged from 47 to 80/ml in RA patients and 30–40/ml in healthy controls—a frequency of ∼1/2,000 CD4+ T cells. There was no significant difference between RA patients and healthy controls in the number of CD4+ or tetramer+ T cells/ml (Mann-Whitney test compared RA patients and controls for each specificity; Fig. 6 b). However, the number of vimentin-64Cit59-71 (spearman r = 0.76; P 95%. The aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103 peptide was modified with a glycine to tyrosine mutation at position 92, to stabilize the HLA-DRB1*04:01–aggrecan-93-95Cit89-103 complex for structural and tetramer studies. Peptide-loaded HLA-DR4 was then purified from HLA-DR4CLIP using Strep-Tactin Sepharose (IBA; Göttingen). The unbound protein was concentrated and buffer exchanged into 25 mM Tris, pH 7.6, and 50 mM NaCl, followed by removal of the fos/jun zipper by cleavage with enterokinase (GenScript) for 16 h at 21°C. Enterokinase-cleaved, peptide-loaded HLA-DR4 was then purified further via anion exchange chromatography (HiTrap Q HP; GE Healthcare), then buffer exchanged into 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and concentrated to 6 mg/ml for crystallization. Thermal stability assays. Thermal stability assays of HLA-DR4 peptide complexes were performed using a Real-Time Detector instrument (Corbett RotorGene 3000). In brief, HLA-DR4 peptide complexes were prepared at either 10 or 20 µM in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl. SYPRO orange (Invitrogen) was added to monitor unfolding, samples were heated from 30°C to 95°C at 1°C/min and the change in fluorescence intensity was recorded at excitation and emission wavelengths of 530 and 555 nm, respectively (Table 2). Crystallization and structure determination. Crystal trays were set up using the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method at 20°C. Protein and a mother liquor of 100 mM BTP, pH 7.3, 22–28% (vol/vol) PEG3350, and 0.2 M KNO3 were mixed at a 1:1 ratio. Platelike crystals typically grew within 5 d. Crystals were flash frozen in 16% (vol/vol) ethylene glycol before data collection. Data were collected at the MX1 or MX2 beamlines at the Australian Synchrotron and processed using the program Mosflm. The structures were determined by molecular replacement using the program Phaser and subsequently refined using Phenix and iterations of manual refinement using Coot (Table 1). The structures were validated using MOLPROBITY. Human subjects. 20 patients who fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for RA (Aletaha et al., 2010) and 6 ACPA− SE+ healthy controls were included. All individuals provided peripheral blood (PB) samples, although the yield was insufficient for all assays in some cases. Patient demographic details are outlined in Table 3. Disease activity scores (DAS4vCRP) were determined on the day of blood sampling for the study. HLA-DR genotyping was performed at Queensland Health Pathology Services. The study was approved by the Metro South and University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from each individual. Tetramer generation. HLA-DR4 peptide samples were buffer exchanged into 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and biotinylated as described previously (Broughton et al., 2012). The percentage of biotinylation was determined by native gel electrophoresis and complexation with avidin. Tetramers were generated by the addition of streptavidin-PE (BD) or streptavidin-Brilliant Violet (BV421; BioLegend) in an 8:1 molar ratio. Tetramer staining. Initial staining optimization was required as cells were rare, and HLA-DR4 tetramer staining intensity was low. PBMCs from HLA-DRB1*04:01+ RA patients and healthy controls were thawed from frozen aliquots, stained with 4.2 µg/ml PE-labeled tetramers; aqua live-dead discriminator (Invitrogen); FITC-labeled anti-CD11c, -CD14, -CD16, and -CD19; and APC/Cy7-labeled anti-CD4 in the presence of 50 nM dasatinib (Selleckchem). Live CD4+ T cells were gated and non–T cell lineage+ cells were excluded, and then enriched with anti-PE immunomagnetic beads (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec). The HLA-DR4 tetramer gate was set for CD4+ T cells based on PE fluorescence minus one (FMO) staining. Inclusion of 50 nM dasatinib (Selleckchem) during staining markedly increased the detection of tetramer+ T cells. Whereas immunomagnetic enrichment with anti-PE-beads (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec) after staining reduced the number of cells required for acquisition by the flow cytometer, it underestimated the frequency and skewed the phenotype of tetramer+ T cells. Following these optimization experiments, immunomagnetic enrichment was not used; each sample of PBMC was divided into three, and each stained with one PE-labeled tetramer, aqua live-dead, anti–CD14-PerCP/Cy5.5, anti–CD4-APC/Cy7, anti–CD45RO-Pacific blue, anti-CD25-PE/Cy7, anti–Foxp3-Alexa Fluor 488, and anti–CD28-APC (BioLegend and BD), and then analyzed using a Gallios flow cytometer and Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter). HLA-DR4 tetramer gating based on PE FMO staining was kept constant for the entire study. The frequency of CD4+CD14− tetramer+ cells/ml blood was calculated based on cell number determined by addition of TruCOUNT beads (BD). Mice and immunization. I-Ab−/− C57BL/6 mice expressing a chimeric class II transgene containing the α1β1 domains of human DRA1*0101-B1*04:01 on a mouse IEd backbone (DR04:01-IE mice) were obtained from Taconic and bred and housed under specific pathogen–free conditions at University of Queensland. Experiments were approved by the University of Queensland Animal Ethics Committee. Draining lymph nodes of mice immunized with 1 µg Fluvax 2012 (CSL) or saline-treated mice were removed 4 wk later and stained with 7-AAD, FITC-labeled anti-CD11c, CD14, CD16, and CD19, CD4-APC, and PE-labeled DRB1*04:01-HA306-318 tetramer in the presence of dasatinib. Cells were analyzed using a Gallios flow cytometer and Kaluza software. Live CD4+ T cells were gated and non–T cell lineage+ cells were excluded. Gates for the pHLA-II tetramer staining were set based on PE FMO staining. Statistical analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunns’ Multiple Comparison Test compared multiple means. Significance is indicated as *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.0001. All error bars represent SEM. Preparation and digestion of citrullinated vimentin. Recombinant human vimentin was generated as an N-terminal hexahistidine fusion protein in Sf9 insect cells using the Bac-to-Bac Baculovirus Expression System (Invitrogen). Affinity-purified protein was incubated with rabbit skeletal PAD (Sigma-Aldrich) for 16 h at 37°C in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) containing 10 mM CaCl2 and 5 mM dithiothreitol. Citrullinated and control proteins were further purified using Nickel Sepharose (GE). Human cathepsin L was expressed in Pichia pastoris (system donated by D. Brömme, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada), purified and titrated using E-64 as described previously (Brömme et al., 1999). Cathepsin L was preactivated by incubation in 0.1 M acetate, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM cysteine, pH 5.0 for 30 min at room temperature, and 2 nmol cathepsin L was used to digest the vimentin proteins at pH 5.0. At the indicated times, samples were acidified and desalted using a C18 Zip-tip. Samples were eluted with 50% (vol/vol) acetonitrile/0.1% (vol/vol) formic acid, concentrated and separated on an Eksigent Ultra cHiPLC system using a gradient of 5–80% (vol/vol) Acetonitrile for 90 min, and analyzed online using an AB SCIEX 5600+ TripleTOF high resolution mass spectrometer. Repertoire analysis of HLA-DR4 allomorphs. T2-DRB1*04:01, *04:02, and *04:04 cells expressing DM were generated via retroviral transduction of the parental T2 line as previously described (Pang et al., 2010). Cells were expanded in RPMI-10% FCS and pellets of 109 cells snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were ground under cryogenic conditions and resuspended in lysis buffer (0.5% IGEPAL, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and protease inhibitors) as previously described (Dudek et al., 2012; Illing et al., 2012). Cleared lysates were passed over a protein A precolumn followed by an affinity column cross-linked with a monoclonal antibody specific for HLA-DR (LB3.1). Peptide–MHC complexes were eluted from the column by acidification with 10% (vol/vol) acetic acid. Peptides were isolated using reversed-phase HPLC (Chromolith C18 Speed Rod; Merck) on an Akta Ettan HPLC system (GE HealthCare). Fractions were concentrated and analyzed using an AB SCIEX 5600+ TripleTOF high-resolution mass spectrometer as previously described (Dudek et al., 2012). Acquired data were searched against the human proteome (Uniprot/Swissprot v2012_7) using ProteinPilot software v 4.5 (AB SCIEX). The resulting peptide identities were subject to strict bioinformatic criteria, including the use of a decoy database to calculate the false discovery rate (FDR). A 5% FDR cut-off was applied and the filtered dataset was further analyzed manually to exclude redundant peptides and known contaminants. To generate motifs, the minimal core sequences found within nested sets were extracted and the resulting list of peptides were aligned using MEME (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/), where motif width was set to 9–15 and motif distribution set to ‘one per sequence’ (Bailey et al., 2009). Peptides derived from HLA or immunoglobulin molecules were not included in the final motif analysis. Motifs were submitted to Icelogo for visualization using the frequencies of amino acids in the human proteome as a reference set (Colaert et al., 2009).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Transl Med
                Science translational medicine
                1946-6242
                1946-6234
                Jun 3 2015
                : 7
                : 290
                Affiliations
                [1 ] University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia. University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia.
                [2 ] University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia.
                [3 ] Singapore Immunology Network, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, 8A Biomedical Grove, Immunos Building, Level 3, Biopolis, 138673 Singapore, Singapore.
                [4 ] Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2333, Netherlands.
                [5 ] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
                [6 ] Queensland Clinical Trials & Biostatistics Centre, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia.
                [7 ] University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia. ranjeny.thomas@uq.edu.au.
                Article
                7/290/290ra87
                10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9301
                26041704
                0ce49156-bb80-48d0-9e1b-5bc22aae3747
                Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article