2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Computer-guided implant placement associated with computer-aided bone regeneration in the treatment of atrophied partially edentulous alveolar ridges: A proof-of-concept study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background/purpose

          The existing literature lacks information regarding the use of digital workflows during pre-surgical planning of implant rehabilitations in resorbed edentulous ridges. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of computer-guided implant placement and simultaneous computer-aided guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the treatment of atrophic posterior alveolar ridges.

          Materials and methods

          Partially edentulous patients requiring GBR simultaneously to implant insertion were enrolled. Implant positions and the augmented missing bone were planned with specific software. A stereolithographic model of the grafted jaw was produced to transfer the virtual bone augmentation to the surgical field. A tooth-supported stent was used to guide implant insertion according to the virtual project. Visual analogue scales (VASs) were used to self-register postoperative pain, swelling, bleeding, and perception of the operation. Post-operative cone-beam computed tomography scan was superimposed to the virtual project to evaluate the accuracy of implant positions.

          Results

          Overall, 10 implants were placed in 5 patients. Healing proceeded uneventfully in all except one patient that showed a dehiscence of the lingual flap as early surgical complication. Nevertheless, complete filling of the bone defects was observed clinically and radiographically in all patients. Pain scored exceptionally high with respect to the other variables. Deviations of 0.73 ± 0.21 mm, 0.59 ± 0.28 mm, and 3.05° ± 1.22° were found at implant head, apex, and long-axis respectively. Distal implants showed higher angular deviations compared to mesial implants (p = 0.008).

          Conclusion

          Computer-guided approach provided encouraging results in terms of efficacy and accuracy. Conversely, patient-centered outcomes were below the expectations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review.

            To assess the literature on the accuracy and clinical performance of static computer-assisted implant surgery in implant dentistry.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement.

              To assess the accuracy of static computer-guided implant placement.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Dent Sci
                J Dent Sci
                Journal of Dental Sciences
                Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China
                1991-7902
                2213-8862
                03 April 2020
                January 2021
                03 April 2020
                : 16
                : 1
                : 333-341
                Affiliations
                [a ]Implant Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillofacial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
                [b ]Branemark Osseointegration Center India, Bengaluru, India
                [c ]Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” - UNESP, Araçatuba, Brazil
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Implant Center for Edentulism and Jawbone Atrophies, Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Odontostomatology Unit, Fondazione Cà Granda IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Via Commenda 10, 20122, Milan, Italy. Fax: +390255032513. pierpaolo_poli@ 123456fastwebnet.it
                Article
                S1991-7902(20)30056-8
                10.1016/j.jds.2020.02.010
                7770249
                33384817
                0d7090f0-a020-4a8a-beb0-1204e1418e72
                © 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 January 2020
                : 26 February 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                accuracy,bone atrophy,bone regeneration,computer-guided surgery,dental implants

                Comments

                Comment on this article