35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Generation and Analysis of a Mouse Intestinal Metatranscriptome through Illumina Based RNA-Sequencing

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          With the advent of high through-put sequencing (HTS), the emerging science of metagenomics is transforming our understanding of the relationships of microbial communities with their environments. While metagenomics aims to catalogue the genes present in a sample through assessing which genes are actively expressed, metatranscriptomics can provide a mechanistic understanding of community inter-relationships. To achieve these goals, several challenges need to be addressed from sample preparation to sequence processing, statistical analysis and functional annotation. Here we use an inbred non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse model in which germ-free animals were colonized with a defined mixture of eight commensal bacteria, to explore methods of RNA extraction and to develop a pipeline for the generation and analysis of metatranscriptomic data. Applying the Illumina HTS platform, we sequenced 12 NOD cecal samples prepared using multiple RNA-extraction protocols. The absence of a complete set of reference genomes necessitated a peptide-based search strategy. Up to 16% of sequence reads could be matched to a known bacterial gene. Phylogenetic analysis of the mapped ORFs revealed a distribution consistent with ribosomal RNA, the majority from Bacteroides or Clostridium species. To place these HTS data within a systems context, we mapped the relative abundance of corresponding Escherichia coli homologs onto metabolic and protein-protein interaction networks. These maps identified bacterial processes with components that were well-represented in the datasets. In summary this study highlights the potential of exploiting the economy of HTS platforms for metatranscriptomics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: implications for the microbial "pan-genome".

          The development of efficient and inexpensive genome sequencing methods has revolutionized the study of human bacterial pathogens and improved vaccine design. Unfortunately, the sequence of a single genome does not reflect how genetic variability drives pathogenesis within a bacterial species and also limits genome-wide screens for vaccine candidates or for antimicrobial targets. We have generated the genomic sequence of six strains representing the five major disease-causing serotypes of Streptococcus agalactiae, the main cause of neonatal infection in humans. Analysis of these genomes and those available in databases showed that the S. agalactiae species can be described by a pan-genome consisting of a core genome shared by all isolates, accounting for approximately 80% of any single genome, plus a dispensable genome consisting of partially shared and strain-specific genes. Mathematical extrapolation of the data suggests that the gene reservoir available for inclusion in the S. agalactiae pan-genome is vast and that unique genes will continue to be identified even after sequencing hundreds of genomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer

            Background Gene expression profiling of breast cancer has identified two biologically distinct estrogen receptor (ER)-positive subtypes of breast cancer: luminal A and luminal B. Luminal B tumors have higher proliferation and poorer prognosis than luminal A tumors. In this study, we developed a clinically practical immunohistochemistry assay to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors and investigated its ability to separate tumors according to breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival. Methods Tumors from a cohort of 357 patients with invasive breast carcinomas were subtyped by gene expression profile. Hormone receptor status, HER2 status, and the Ki67 index (percentage of Ki67-positive cancer nuclei) were determined immunohistochemically. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the Ki67 cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors. The prognostic value of the immunohistochemical assignment for breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival was investigated with an independent tissue microarray series of 4046 breast cancers by use of Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression. Results Gene expression profiling classified 101 (28%) of the 357 tumors as luminal A and 69 (19%) as luminal B. The best Ki67 index cut point to distinguish luminal B from luminal A tumors was 13.25%. In an independent cohort of 4046 patients with breast cancer, 2847 had hormone receptor–positive tumors. When HER2 immunohistochemistry and the Ki67 index were used to subtype these 2847 tumors, we classified 1530 (59%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 57% to 61%) as luminal A, 846 (33%, 95% CI = 31% to 34%) as luminal B, and 222 (9%, 95% CI = 7% to 10%) as luminal–HER2 positive. Luminal B and luminal–HER2-positive breast cancers were statistically significantly associated with poor breast cancer recurrence-free and disease-specific survival in all adjuvant systemic treatment categories. Of particular relevance are women who received tamoxifen as their sole adjuvant systemic therapy, among whom the 10-year breast cancer–specific survival was 79% (95% CI = 76% to 83%) for luminal A, 64% (95% CI = 59% to 70%) for luminal B, and 57% (95% CI = 47% to 69%) for luminal–HER2 subtypes. Conclusion Expression of ER, progesterone receptor, and HER2 proteins and the Ki67 index appear to distinguish luminal A from luminal B breast cancer subtypes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The microbial pan-genome.

              A decade after the beginning of the genomic era, the question of how genomics can describe a bacterial species has not been fully addressed. Experimental data have shown that in some species new genes are discovered even after sequencing the genomes of several strains. Mathematical modeling predicts that new genes will be discovered even after sequencing hundreds of genomes per species. Therefore, a bacterial species can be described by its pan-genome, which is composed of a "core genome" containing genes present in all strains, and a "dispensable genome" containing genes present in two or more strains and genes unique to single strains. Given that the number of unique genes is vast, the pan-genome of a bacterial species might be orders of magnitude larger than any single genome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                27 April 2012
                : 7
                : 4
                : e36009
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Program in Molecular Structure and Function, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
                [2 ]Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [5 ]Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [6 ]Program in Genetics and Genomic Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
                [7 ]Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
                [8 ]Department Klinische Forschung, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
                [9 ]Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [10 ]Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                [11 ]Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
                Cairo University, Egypt
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JP DNF PP JSD. Performed the experiments: XX DNF CER JM. Analyzed the data: XX DNF CER JP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SSH AJC KDM AJM. Wrote the paper: DNF PP JSD JP.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-00232
                10.1371/journal.pone.0036009
                3338770
                22558305
                0df733f1-6ba7-4c1d-97b1-6f595d5aabce
                Xiong et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 30 December 2011
                : 29 March 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Computational Biology
                Genomics
                Genome Analysis Tools
                Transcriptomes
                Comparative Genomics
                Metagenomics
                Sequence Analysis
                Systems Biology
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                DNA transcription
                Genomics
                Genome Analysis Tools
                Transcriptomes
                Microbiology
                Bacteriology
                Bacterial Biochemistry
                Microbial Ecology
                Model Organisms
                Animal Models
                Mouse
                Molecular Cell Biology
                Gene Expression
                DNA transcription

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article