6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of tinnitus distress on cognition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tinnitus is the chronic perception of a phantom sound with different levels of related distress. Past research has elucidated interactions of tinnitus distress with audiological, affective and further clinical variables. The influence of tinnitus distress on cognition is underinvestigated. Our study aims at investigating specific influences of tinnitus distress and further associated predictors on cognition in a cohort of n = 146 out-ward clinical tinnitus patients. Age, educational level, hearing loss, Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) score, tinnitus duration, speech in noise (SIN), stress, anxiety and depression, and psychological well-being were included as predictors of a machine learning regression approach (elastic net) in three models with scores of a multiple choice vocabulary test (MWT-B), or two trail-making tests (TMT-A and TMT-B), as dependent variables. TQ scores predicted lower MWT-B scores and higher TMT-B test completion time. Stress, emotional, and psychological variables were not found to be relevant predictors in all models with the exception of small positive influences of SIN and depression on TMT-B. Effect sizes were small to medium for all models and predictors. Results are indicative of specific influence of tinnitus distress on cognitive performance, especially on general or crystallized intelligence and executive functions. More research is needed at the delicate intersection of tinnitus distress and cognitive skills needed in daily functioning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references68

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review.

            To review the literature of the validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A review of the 747 identified papers that used HADS was performed to address the following questions: (I) How are the factor structure, discriminant validity and the internal consistency of HADS? (II) How does HADS perform as a case finder for anxiety disorders and depression? (III) How does HADS agree with other self-rating instruments used to rate anxiety and depression? Most factor analyses demonstrated a two-factor solution in good accordance with the HADS subscales for Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D), respectively. The correlations between the two subscales varied from.40 to.74 (mean.56). Cronbach's alpha for HADS-A varied from.68 to.93 (mean.83) and for HADS-D from.67 to.90 (mean.82). In most studies an optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity was achieved when caseness was defined by a score of 8 or above on both HADS-A and HADS-D. The sensitivity and specificity for both HADS-A and HADS-D of approximately 0.80 were very similar to the sensitivity and specificity achieved by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Correlations between HADS and other commonly used questionnaires were in the range.49 to.83. HADS was found to perform well in assessing the symptom severity and caseness of anxiety disorders and depression in both somatic, psychiatric and primary care patients and in the general population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education.

              Normative data for the Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B are presented for 911 community-dwelling individuals aged 18-89 years. Performance on the TMT decreased with increasing age and lower levels of education. Based on these results, the norms were stratified for both age (11 groups) and education (2 levels). The current norms represent a more comprehensive set of norms than previously available and will increase the ability of neuropsychologists to determine more precisely the degree to which scores on the TMT reflect impaired performance for varying ages and education.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                birgit.mazurek@charite.de
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                26 January 2021
                26 January 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 2243
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7727.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2190 5763, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, , University of Regensburg, ; Regensburg, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.7400.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0650, University Research Priority Program ‘Dynamics of Healthy Aging’, , University of Zürich, ; Zürich, Switzerland
                [3 ]GRID grid.6363.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, Tinnitus-Zentrum, , Charité - Universitätsmedizin, ; Berlin, Germany
                [4 ]Terzo Institute, ISMA AG, Sonneberg, Germany
                Article
                81728
                10.1038/s41598-021-81728-0
                7838303
                33500489
                0ea069b6-3c82-443b-a250-555790a30911
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 27 October 2020
                : 1 January 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010665, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions;
                Award ID: 722046
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Projekt DEAL
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                human behaviour,neuroscience,neurology,signs and symptoms,epidemiology,translational research

                Comments

                Comment on this article