7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Flexibility and safety in times of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Implications for nurses and allied professionals in cardiology

      editorial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Never before have so many healthcare professionals been in the daily news worldwide as now, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Hospitals are intensifying their resources for patients in need of intensive care and respiratory support, converting wards into COVID-19 units and, at the same time, stopping or restricting non-life threatening diagnostic procedures and treatment, for instance elective surgery. For the healthcare professionals working in cardiology, the COVID-19 pandemic has many consequences that might not be directly visible in day-to-day news coverage. Still, we struggle with similar issues in many countries around the world and this editorial addresses some aspects related to COVID-19 with the goal of enlarging our feelings of unity and solidarity in this field and learning from each other’s experiences. Cardiology is a broad medical field including both acute and chronic aspects of care that are all affected by COVID-19. For healthcare providers, a lot of flexibility is asked for because of changes in schedules, job assignments, workplace, etc. But at the same time, cardiac patients ask for stability and security in care too; patients still need adequate diagnostics, treatment, education and follow-up. Challenges to cardiac patients and families during the COVID-19 pandemic Although a lot of patients can be managed well with support from a distance and are practising optimal self-care, many cardiac patients have problems and worries that are especially caused by the restrictions that the COVID-19 pandemic lays on society as well as the healthcare system. Some of them are: - Worrying about delayed or cancelled diagnostics and treatment. For example, will my ICD be replaced in a timely manner or is it safe to delay my intervention or cardiac surgery. Others worry about their diagnostic angiogram that is postponed and wonder if it is safe or if they will have a heart attack. - Worrying about optimal care and readmission when out-patient follow-up visits are postponed or delayed, or when they are not admitted to hospital or discharged earlier than in a normal situation without COVID-19. - Feeling extra vulnerable and anxious as a cardiac patient and being advised of the need for total social distancing since they are at risk of becoming very ill or might die if affected by the coronavirus, or on the other hand feeling frustrated by being considered a ‘risk group’, while not feeling different than yesterday. - Being restricted in the ability to exercise in, for example, the rehabilitation centre at the hospital or the local gym. - Being afraid to get infected with COVID-19 and not knowing how to handle daily issues (for instance, what to disinfect and how often). - Becoming angry and frightened when others do not adhere to advice given by the government and healthcare authorities (for instance keeping a distance). - Feeling anxious and stressed when met by healthcare professionals in protective clothing or when met by healthcare professionals with no protection because of lack of protective equipment. - Worrying about deterioration while having acute severe symptoms of chest pain and shortness of breath and needing to be tested before receiving acute treatment or being hospitalised. - Delaying seeking healthcare with acute chest pain and not knowing if their complaints are severe enough to burden the healthcare system. - Worrying about if there will be enough resources to be treated with for example an acute PCI. - Getting worried or feeling panic from browsing the Internet for COVID-19 information without any guidance. - Having no realistic insight into the situation and feeling strong and immune, for instance feeling unrealistically safe on antibiotics and prednisolone. - Wondering about whether they should increase, stop or decrease their medications for example ACE-inhibitor or ARB or do other self-care activities if infected by COVID-19. Challenges to cardiac healthcare professionals Healthcare professionals need to stay updated constantly and adapt their advice to patients and also change their own professional and private behaviour. Some of our colleagues need to stay at home because of social distance restrictions on family members, COVID-19 symptoms, preventive quarantine or mental stress. Some colleagues are afraid to go to work in case of endangering themselves or their family. A substantial number of professionals working in the departments of cardiology and cardiothoracic surgery are preparing to alter (have already altered) their daily clinical work, some have experienced having their ward rebuilt to be suitable for COVID-19 patients, some wards have closed completely to relocate staff to other acute care units. Staff are educated to take care of other patient groups than they usually treat (and have expertise in). ICUs are reorganised and rebuilt to the maximum of respiratory beds. Healthcare providers from medical, cardiology and cardiothoracic ICUs create large teams that can work across ICU COVID-19 units with similar equipment and protocols. In a lot of cardiology out-patient clinics, obvious changes include moving to distance follow-up instead of a clinic visit and also extending the length of follow-up phone calls, since many patients want to talk about COVID-19 and what it means to them. In some hospitals, the pacemaker control period is extended from bi- or tri-monthly to yearly, most angiograms and electrophysiology procedures are cancelled. ICDs are monitored using tele-monitoring systems, preventing patients from coming to hospital after receiving a shock therapy and reassuring them by telephone. It is amazing how quickly telecare and distance monitoring have become almost ‘the new normal’ and how flexible patient and healthcare professionals are in adopting these practices. 1 However, specific challenges of distance follow-up have also become painfully clear and need creative solutions. 2 For example, it is more difficult to estimate whether a newly referred patient or his or her family can recognise signs and symptoms, such as leg oedema in heart failure patients, or whether they are able to decide if it is necessary to come to the hospital. In addition, in patients with visual or auditory impairments, it can be difficult to change medication by phone, especially when a patient does not have email or cannot read very well. For patients who are very lonely and feel socially isolated, and/or elderly patients, extra telephone contact with the clinic can be very important to ask questions and help to solve problems. Uptitration of medication can be complicated without appropriate laboratory tests or physical examination of a patient. Every time one orders a laboratory test (at home or in an office) one has to balance the risk of exposing the patient to possible COVID-19 infection (or the healthcare professional in taking the blood) yet really needing the laboratory value to adapt medication, for example to make that last step in an uptitration schedule. Valuable moments and creativity Professionals and patients are constantly trying to find practical solutions, such as: - Use of video conferencing with patients or their family or, if this is too difficult, use of a picture on the phone to show, for instance, a wound or oedema. - Having ECG and laboratory tests done close to the patients (for instance at the GP because of fast AF). - More contact by email and regular mail. - Closer collaboration with primary care. - Sending information about websites where people can see how the heart works, what happens in cases of fluid retention etc. - Emphasis that patients and their family can contact the clinics and, when necessary, they can come to the hospital and will be treated. Meanwhile, there appears to be a collaboration within and between disciplines and professions as never before. All healthcare workers must adapt to this new situation, and this is not only accompanied by fear and stress, but also by solidarity and heroic work. Similarly, in talking to patients and family members, valuable moments can also occur. For example, talking about life and death seems to be easier for some patients and family members in this exceptional situation. While patients feel much more vulnerable, healthcare workers in cardiology need to give flexible and secure patient care on an optimal level.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Creating the New Normal: The Clinician Response to Covid-19

          Editor’s commentary on how Covid-19 has changed health care, and why some aspects of care delivery should not go back to the way they were.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interaction between tele-nurses and callers with an evolving myocardial infarction: Consequences for level of directed care.

            Rapid contact with emergency medical services is imperative to save the lives of acute myocardial infarction patients. However, many patients turn to a telehealth advisory nurse instead, where the delivery of urgent and safe care largely depends on how the interaction in the call is established.
              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs
              Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs
              CNU
              spcnu
              European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
              SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
              1474-5151
              1873-1953
              23 April 2020
              August 2020
              : 19
              : 6
              : 462-464
              Affiliations
              [1 ]Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
              [2 ]Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
              [3 ]University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
              [4 ]Department of Cardiology, Salzburg University Hospital, Austria
              [5 ]Faculty of Medicine, Pflegedirektion, Heart Centre Freiburg - University of Freiburg, Germany
              [6 ]Centre for Patient-Centered Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
              [7 ]Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping University, Sweden
              Author notes
              [*]Tiny Jaarsma, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, Norrkoping, 601 74, Sweden. Email: tiny.jaarsma@ 123456liu.se
              Article
              10.1177_1474515120921027
              10.1177/1474515120921027
              7441330
              32323572
              0f2fd8a3-4bf5-45c8-b1b0-eedbdd436137
              © The European Society of Cardiology 2020

              This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

              History
              Categories
              Editorials
              Custom metadata
              ts1

              Nursing
              Nursing

              Comments

              Comment on this article