4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Organization of corticostriatal motor inputs in monkey putamen.

      Journal of Neurophysiology
      Action Potentials, physiology, Animals, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Macaca, anatomy & histology, Male, Motor Cortex, cytology, Movement, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Putamen

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To analyze the organization of corticostriatal motor inputs, we examined the neuronal responses in the putamen (Put) to stimulation in the primary motor cortex (MI) and the supplementary motor area (SMA). Stimulating electrodes were chronically implanted in the distal and proximal parts of the forelimb representation of the MI and in the forelimb representation of the SMA in Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata). Stimulation in the MI and SMA evoked orthodromic spike discharges in both phasically active and tonically active Put neurons. The latency of excitation evoked by MI stimulation was shorter than that of excitation evoked by SMA stimulation. Neurons responding exclusively to MI stimulation (MI-recipient neurons) and those responding exclusively to SMA stimulation (SMA-recipient neurons) were distributed predominantly in the ventrolateral and dorsomedial portion of the caudal aspect of the Put, respectively. About 20% of the recorded neurons responded concurrently to stimulation in both the MI and SMA (MI + SMA-recipient neurons). These neurons were located in the intermediate zone between the MI- and SMA-recipient zones. More than half of the Put neurons responded to sensorimotor stimulation. Movements of the forelimb were readily elicited by microstimulation in the MI-recipient zone, less frequently in the MI + SMA-recipient zone, and rarely in the SMA-recipient zone. More detailed analysis of the somatotopic arrangement based on cortical inputs, sensorimotor responses, and microstimulation-evoked movements revealed that within the MI- and MI + SMA-recipient zones of the Put, neurons representing the distal part of the forelimb were located more ventrally than those representing the proximal part. No such somatotopy was clearly detected in the SMA-recipient zone. The present results indicate that corticostriatal inputs from the forelimb regions of the MI and SMA are largely segregated. On the other hand, convergent inputs from the MI and SMA were noted on single neurons located at the junction between the two input zones. In addition, the corticostriatal inputs from the forelimb region of the MI exhibited a distal to proximal somatotopic organization along the ventrodorsal axis of the Put.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article