6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      THE JOINT EVOLUTION OF DISPERSAL AND DORMANCY IN A METAPOPULATION WITH LOCAL EXTINCTIONS AND KIN COMPETITION : JOINT EVOLUTION OF DISPERSAL AND DORMANCY

      , , , ,
      Evolution
      Wiley-Blackwell

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dispersal and dormancy are two strategies that allow recolonization of empty patches and escape from kin competition. Because they presumably respond to similar evolutionary forces, it is tempting to consider that these strategies may substitute for each other. Yet in order to predict the outcome of the evolution of dispersal and dormancy, and to characterize the emerging covariation between both traits, it is necessary to consider models where dispersal and dormancy evolve jointly. Here, we analyze the evolution of dispersal and dormancy as a function of direct fitness costs, environmental variation, and competition among relatives. We consider two scenarios depending on whether the rates of dormancy for philopatric and dispersed individuals are constrained to be the same (unconditional dormancy) or allowed to be different (conditional dormancy). We show that only philopatric individuals should enter dormancy, at a rate increasing with increasing rates of local extinction and decreasing population sizes. When dormancy and dispersal evolve jointly, we observe a wide range of evolutionary outcomes. In particular, we find that the pattern of covariation between the evolutionarily stable rates of dispersal and dormancy is molded by the rate of extinction and the local population size.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch.

          A fraction of a genetically homogeneous microbial population may survive exposure to stress such as antibiotic treatment. Unlike resistant mutants, cells regrown from such persistent bacteria remain sensitive to the antibiotic. We investigated the persistence of single cells of Escherichia coli with the use of microfluidic devices. Persistence was linked to preexisting heterogeneity in bacterial populations because phenotypic switching occurred between normally growing cells and persister cells having reduced growth rates. Quantitative measurements led to a simple mathematical description of the persistence switch. Inherent heterogeneity of bacterial populations may be important in adaptation to fluctuating environments and in the persistence of bacterial infections.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease.

            Kim Lewis (2007)
            Several well-recognized puzzles in microbiology have remained unsolved for decades. These include latent bacterial infections, unculturable microorganisms, persister cells and biofilm multidrug tolerance. Accumulating evidence suggests that these seemingly disparate phenomena result from the ability of bacteria to enter into a dormant (non-dividing) state. The molecular mechanisms that underlie the formation of dormant persister cells are now being unravelled and are the focus of this Review.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The moulding of senescence by natural selection.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Evolution
                Evolution
                Wiley-Blackwell
                00143820
                June 2013
                June 2013
                : 67
                : 6
                : 1676-1691
                Article
                10.1111/evo.12069
                23730761
                10b49e1c-31c4-48f4-8232-9426d9783247
                © 2013

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article