2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bladder Cancer Sample Handling and Reporting: Pathologist's Point of View

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this narrative review is to provide adequate information on handling and reporting of the bladder cancer samples to improve the closely collaboration between pathologists and urologists. The main (but not exclusive) research tool used was PubMed and 87 references were selected and quoted in the text. We have considered handling of biopsies, transurethral resection (TUR), and cystectomy specimens to summarize the different methods of sampling and the related issues. Moreover, we considered and discussed the main prognostic factors, such as histological tumor type, grade, and stage of bladder cancer, that should be described in the pathological report. In addition, critical issues encountered in the interpretation of histological samples were discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours.

          The fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of urogenital tumours (WHO "blue book"), published in 2016, contains significant revisions. These revisions were performed after consideration by a large international group of pathologists with special expertise in this area. A subgroup of these persons met at the WHO Consensus Conference in Zurich, Switzerland, in 2015 to finalize the revisions. This review summarizes the most significant differences between the newly published classification and the prior version for renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Newly recognized epithelial renal tumours are hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) syndrome-associated RCC, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, tubulocystic RCC, acquired cystic disease-associated RCC, and clear cell papillary RCC. The WHO/International Society of Urological Pathology renal tumour grading system was recommended, and the definition of renal papillary adenoma was modified. The new WHO classification of penile squamous cell carcinomas is based on the presence of human papillomavirus and defines histologic subtypes accordingly. Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) of the testis is the WHO-recommended term for precursor lesions of invasive germ cell tumours, and testicular germ cell tumours are now separated into two fundamentally different groups: those derived from GCNIS and those unrelated to GCNIS. Spermatocytic seminoma has been designated as a spermatocytic tumour and placed within the group of non-GCNIS-related tumours in the 2016 WHO classification.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update

            This overview presents the updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ (CIS).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee.

              This WHO/ISUP system is an attempt to develop as broad a consensus as possible in the classification of urothelial neoplasms, building upon earlier works and classification systems. It is meant to serve as a springboard for future studies that will help refine this classification, thus enabling us to provide better correlation of these lesions with their biologic behavior using uniform terminology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Surg
                Front Surg
                Front. Surg.
                Frontiers in Surgery
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-875X
                02 December 2021
                2021
                : 8
                : 754741
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Section of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche , Ancona, Italy
                [2] 2Departement of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche , Ancona, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jeremy Teoh, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

                Reviewed by: Petros Sountoulides, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; Richard Naspro, Fondazione Ospedale San Matteo (IRCCS), Italy

                *Correspondence: Roberta Mazzucchelli r.mazzucchelli@ 123456univpm.it

                This article was submitted to Genitourinary Surgery, a section of the journal Frontiers in Surgery

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fsurg.2021.754741
                8674620
                34926567
                114c432a-262a-4e68-b1ab-4bd6c8f90600
                Copyright © 2021 Mazzucchelli, Marzioni, Tossetta, Pepi and Montironi.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 August 2021
                : 15 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 87, Pages: 11, Words: 8533
                Categories
                Surgery
                Review

                bladder,carcinoma,cystectomy,staging,handling,reporting
                bladder, carcinoma, cystectomy, staging, handling, reporting

                Comments

                Comment on this article