12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recent advances in the understanding of renal inflammation and fibrosis in lupus nephritis

      review-article
      1 , 1 , a , 1
      F1000Research
      F1000Research
      Lupus nephritis, AKI, acute kidney injury, renal failure, SLE

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lupus nephritis is a potentially reversible cause of severe acute kidney injury and is an important cause of end-stage renal failure in Asians and patients of African or Hispanic descent. It is characterized by aberrant exaggerated innate and adaptive immune responses, autoantibody production and their deposition in the kidney parenchyma, triggering complement activation, activation and proliferation of resident renal cells, and expression of pro-inflammatory and chemotactic molecules leading to the influx of inflammatory cells, all of which culminate in destruction of normal nephrons and their replacement by fibrous tissue. Anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody level correlates with disease activity in most patients. There is evidence that apart from mediating pathogenic processes through the formation of immune complexes, pathogenic anti-dsDNA antibodies can bind to resident renal cells and induce downstream pro-apoptotic, pro-inflammatory, or pro-fibrotic processes or a combination of these. Recent data also highlight the critical role of macrophages in acute and chronic kidney injury. Though clinically effective, current treatments for lupus nephritis encompass non-specific immunosuppression and the anti-inflammatory action of high-dose corticosteroids. The clinical and histological impact of novel biologics targeting pro-inflammatory molecules remains to be investigated. Insight into the underlying mechanisms that induce inflammatory and fibrotic processes in the kidney of lupus nephritis could present opportunities for more specific novel treatment options to improve clinical outcomes while minimizing off-target untoward effects. This review discusses recent advances in the understanding of pathogenic mechanisms leading to inflammation and fibrosis of the kidney in lupus nephritis in the context of established standard-of-care and emerging therapies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references110

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interferon-inducible gene expression signature in peripheral blood cells of patients with severe lupus.

          Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex, inflammatory autoimmune disease that affects multiple organ systems. We used global gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to identify distinct patterns of gene expression that distinguish most SLE patients from healthy controls. Strikingly, about half of the patients studied showed dysregulated expression of genes in the IFN pathway. Furthermore, this IFN gene expression "signature" served as a marker for more severe disease involving the kidneys, hematopoetic cells, and/or the central nervous system. These results provide insights into the genetic pathways underlying SLE, and identify a subgroup of patients who may benefit from therapies targeting the IFN pathway.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Transforming growth factor beta in tissue fibrosis.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Anifrolumab, an Anti–Interferon‐α Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, in Moderate‐to‐Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

              Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of anifrolumab, a type I interferon (IFN) receptor antagonist, in a phase IIb, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of adults with moderate‐to‐severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Patients (n = 305) were randomized to receive intravenous anifrolumab (300 mg or 1,000 mg) or placebo, in addition to standard therapy, every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. Randomization was stratified by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 score (<10 or ≥10), oral corticosteroid dosage (<10 or ≥10 mg/day), and type I IFN gene signature test status (high or low) based on a 4‐gene expression assay. The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving an SLE Responder Index (SRI[4]) response at week 24 with sustained reduction of oral corticosteroids (<10 mg/day and less than or equal to the dose at week 1 from week 12 through 24). Other end points (including SRI[4], British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG]–based Composite Lupus Assessment [BICLA], modified SRI[6], and major clinical response) were assessed at week 52. The primary end point was analyzed in the modified intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population and type I IFN–high subpopulation. The study result was considered positive if the primary end point was met in either of the 2 study populations. The Type I error rate was controlled at 0.10 (2‐sided), within each of the 2 study populations for the primary end point analysis. Results The primary end point was met by more patients treated with anifrolumab (34.3% of 99 for 300 mg and 28.8% of 104 for 1,000 mg) than placebo (17.6% of 102) (P = 0.014 for 300 mg and P = 0.063 for 1,000 mg, versus placebo), with greater effect size in patients with a high IFN signature at baseline (13.2% in placebo‐treated patients versus 36.0% [P = 0.004] and 28.2% [P = 0.029]) in patients treated with anifrolumab 300 mg and 1,000 mg, respectively. At week 52, patients treated with anifrolumab achieved greater responses in SRI(4) (40.2% versus 62.6% [P < 0.001] and 53.8% [P = 0.043] with placebo, anifrolumab 300 mg, and anifrolumab 1,000 mg, respectively), BICLA (25.7% versus 53.5% [P < 0.001] and 41.2% [P = 0.018], respectively), modified SRI(6) (28.4% versus 49.5% [P = 0.002] and 44.7% [P = 0.015], respectively), major clinical response (BILAG 2004 C or better in all organ domains from week 24 through week 52) (6.9% versus 19.2% [P = 0.012] and 17.3% [P = 0.025], respectively), and several other global and organ‐specific end points. Herpes zoster was more frequent in the anifrolumab‐treated patients (2.0% with placebo treatment versus 5.1% and 9.5% with anifrolumab 300 mg and 1,000 mg, respectively), as were cases reported as influenza (2.0% versus 6.1% and 7.6%, respectively), in the anifrolumab treatment groups. Incidence of serious adverse events was similar between groups (18.8% versus 16.2% and 17.1%, respectively). Conclusion Anifrolumab substantially reduced disease activity compared with placebo across multiple clinical end points in the patients with moderate‐to‐severe SLE.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                F1000Res
                F1000Res
                F1000Research
                F1000Research
                F1000Research (London, UK )
                2046-1402
                13 June 2017
                2017
                : 6
                : 874
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
                Author notes

                Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3495-4051
                Article
                10.12688/f1000research.10445.1
                5473406
                28663794
                121ddf1f-efe6-4f68-a426-13ab096f3075
                Copyright: © 2017 Yung S et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 June 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: RGC General Research Fund
                Award ID: HKU 7366/04M, 7550/06M, 7604/10M, HKU 7607/12M, 17100914, 17126814
                Funded by: UGC Matching Grant Scheme
                Award ID: Phases IV, V, VI
                Funded by: Wai Hung Charitable Foundation Limited
                Funded by: Yu Chiu Kwong Professorship in Medicine
                Studies undertaken by TMC’s group [1, 4, 10, 12, 14–17, 22, 31, 39] were funded by the RGC General Research Fund (HKU 7366/04M, 7550/06M, 7604/10M, HKU 7607/12M, 17100914, and 17126814) and UGC Matching Grant Schemes (Phases IV, V, and VI). SY is supported by the Wai Hung Charitable Foundation Limited and the ‘Yu Chiu Kwong Professorship in Medicine’ Endowment Fund awarded to TMC.
                The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Review
                Articles
                Antigen Processing & Recognition
                Autoimmunity
                Cell Signaling
                Cellular Death & Stress Responses
                Immune & Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases (incl. Arthritis)
                Immunomodulation
                Immunopharmacology & Hematologic Pharmacology
                Innate Immunity
                Leukocyte Activation
                Pathophysiology of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
                Renal Immunology & Pathology (incl. Glomerular Diseases)
                Renal Pharmacology
                Tubulo-Interstitial Diseases of the Kidney

                lupus nephritis,aki,acute kidney injury,renal failure,sle
                lupus nephritis, aki, acute kidney injury, renal failure, sle

                Comments

                Comment on this article