10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Self versus informant reports on the specific levels of functioning scale: Relationships to depression and cognition in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The goal of the current study was to examine the relationships between insight and both cognitive function and depression in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, and to determine if there were similar relationships across diagnostic categories. We examined discrepancies between self and informant reports of function on the Specific levels of function scale as a metric of insight for interpersonal, social acceptance, work and activities. We examined two samples of individuals with schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective disorder (Ns of 188 and 67 respectively). In Sample 1, cognition was measured using the Dot Probe Expectancy Task. In Sample 2, cognition was measured by averaging several subtests from the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery, as well as additional measures of working memory. In both samples, depression was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. In both samples, we found significant relationships between worse cognition and overestimations of work function, as well as between higher depression levels and underestimation of interpersonal function. These relationships were specific to interpersonal and work function, with significantly stronger correlations with interpersonal and work function compared to the other areas of function. Similar results were found across diagnostic categories. These results have important implications for treatment planning, as they suggest the need to take into account depression and cognitive function when evaluating the patient's self-report of function, and highlight the utility of informant reports in evaluating function and treatment planning. Further, they add to the literature on the similarity across schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in a variety of pathological mechanisms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia?

            M. Green (1996)
            It has been well established that schizophrenic patients have neurocognitive deficits, but it is not known how these deficits influence the daily lives of patients. The goal of this review was to determine which, if any, neurocognitive deficits restrict the functioning of schizophrenic patients in the outside world. The author reviewed studies that have evaluated neurocognitive measures as predictors and correlates of functional outcome for schizophrenic patients. The review included 1) studies that have prospectively evaluated specific aspects of neurocognition and community (e.g., social and vocational) functioning (six studies), 2) all known studies of neurocognitive correlates of social problem solving (five studies), and 3) all known studies of neurocognitive correlates and predictors of psychosocial skill acquisition (six studies). Despite wide variation among studies in the selection of neurocognitive measures, some consistencies emerged. The most consistent finding was that verbal memory was associated with all types of functional outcome. Vigilance was related to social problem solving and skill acquisition. Card sorting predicted community functioning but not social problem solving. Negative symptoms were associated with social problem solving but not skill acquisition. Notably, psychotic symptoms were not significantly associated with outcome measures in any of the studies reviewed. Verbal memory and vigilance appear to be necessary for adequate functional outcome. Deficiencies in these areas may prevent patients from attaining optimal adaptation and hence act as "neurocognitive rate-limiting factors." On the basis of this review of the literature, a series of hypotheses are offered for follow-up studies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Comparing correlated correlation coefficients.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Schizophr Res Cogn
                Schizophr Res Cogn
                Schizophrenia Research: Cognition
                Elsevier
                2215-0013
                09 May 2017
                September 2017
                09 May 2017
                : 9
                : 1-7
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Psychological & Brain Science, Washington University, Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, United States
                [b ]University of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States
                [c ]Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Dept of Psychiatry, University of Maryland Baltimore, PO Box 21247, Baltimore, MD 21228, United States
                [d ]Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
                [e ]Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 75 E. River Rd., Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
                [f ]Rutgers University, Department of Psychiatry, 671 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States
                [g ]Case Western Reserve University, PO Box 3837, Corrales, NM 87048, United States
                [h ]Department of Psychological & Brain Science, Washington University, Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, United States
                [i ]Department of Psychiatry, Washington University, Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences; Department of Psychiatry; Department of Radiology, Washington University, Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences; Department of Psychiatry; Department of RadiologyWashington UniversityBox 1125, One Brookings DriveSt. LouisMO63130United States dbarch@ 123456wustl.edu
                Article
                S2215-0013(17)30008-2
                10.1016/j.scog.2017.04.001
                5514389
                28740827
                12f330e0-0f83-4083-b341-ba125ca8933b
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 April 2017
                : 20 April 2017
                Categories
                Research Paper

                insight,psychosis,depression,cognition,function,interpersonal
                insight, psychosis, depression, cognition, function, interpersonal

                Comments

                Comment on this article