4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Addressing Challenges in Formal Research on Moribund Heritage Languages: A Path Forward

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The substantial uptick in research on heritage languages over the past three decades has enhanced our understanding of the development of bilingual grammars throughout the lifespan. This interest has been accompanied by a noticeable increase of experimental work, often combined with some degree of formal rigor. Exclusively and predominantly formal research on these languages—especially studies whose empirical focus centers on moribund heritage varieties—occasionally encounters criticism, due primarily to a lack of understanding of the methodology and objectives of this body of research as a whole. The purpose of this positional essay is to once again elucidate with clarity the motivation and importance of formal linguistic research on these languages, providing a fruitful path forward for continued work in this well-established field of linguistic inquiry.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage.

          Bilingual experience is dynamic and poses a challenge for researchers to develop instruments that capture its relevant dimensions. The present study examined responses from a questionnaire administered to 110 heterogeneous bilingual young adults. These questions concern participants' language use, acquisition history and self-reported proficiency. The questionnaire responses and performances on standardized English proficiency measures were analyzed using factor analysis. In order to retain a realistic representation of bilingual experience, the factors were allowed to correlate with each other in the analysis. Two correlating factors were extracted, representing daily bilingual usage and English proficiency. These two factors were also related to self-rated proficiency in English and non-English language. Results were interpreted as supporting the notion that bilingual experience is composed of multiple related dimensions that will need to be considered in assessments of the consequences of bilingualism.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Longitudinal change in language production: effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content.

            Mixed modeling was used to examine longitudinal changes in linguistic ability in healthy older adults and older adults with dementia. Language samples, vocabulary scores, and digit span scores were collected annually from healthy older adults and semiannually from older adults with dementia. The language samples were scored for grammatical complexity and propositional content. For the healthy group, age-related declines in grammatical complexity and propositional content were observed. The declines were most rapid in the mid 70s. For the group with dementia, grammatical complexity and propositional content also declined over time, regardless of age. Rates of decline were uniform across individuals. These analyses reveal how both grammatical complexity and propositional content are related to late-life changes in cognition in healthy older adults aswell as those with dementia. Alzheimer's disease accelerates this decline, regardless of age.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers

              This paper integrates research on child simultaneous bilingual acquisition more directly into the heritage language acquisition literature. The child simultaneous bilingual literature mostly focuses on development in childhood, whereas heritage speakers are often tested at an endstate in adulthood. However, insights from child simultaneous bilingual acquisition must be considered in heritage language acquisition theorizing precisely because many heritage speakers demonstrate the adult outcomes of child simultaneous bilingual acquisition. Data from child simultaneous bilingual acquisition raises serious questions for the construct of incomplete acquisition, a term broadly used in heritage language acquisition studies to describe almost any difference heritage speakers display from baseline controls (usually monolinguals). We offer an epistemological discussion related to incomplete acquisition, highlighting the descriptive and theoretical inaccuracy of the term. We focus our discussion on two of several possible causal factors that contribute to variable competence outcomes in adult heritage speakers: input and formal instruction in the heritage language. We conclude by offering alternative terminology for heritage speaker outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                29 July 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 700126
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Utrecht University , Utrecht, Netherlands
                [2] 2Center for Multilingualism in Society Across the Lifespan (MultiLing), University of Oslo , Oslo, Norway
                [3] 3Pennsylvania State University, University Park , State College, PA, United States
                [4] 4Centre for Research and Enterprise in Language (CREL), University of Greenwich , London, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Maria Teresa Guasti, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy

                Reviewed by: Esther Rinke, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany; Cristina Maria Flores, University of Minho, Portugal

                *Correspondence: Roberta D'Alessandro r.dalessandro@ 123456uu.nl

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700126
                8358313
                34393935
                14404ed0-aed2-4b4e-a548-ed364edde1e2
                Copyright © 2021 D'Alessandro, Natvig and Putnam.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 25 April 2021
                : 07 June 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 73, Pages: 10, Words: 8796
                Funding
                Funded by: H2020 European Research Council 10.13039/100010663
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                moribund languages,heritage languages,language description,linguistic analysis,theoretical linguistics

                Comments

                Comment on this article