1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Focal vs. fecal: Seasonal variation in the diet of wild vervet monkeys from observational and DNA metabarcoding data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Assessing the diet of wild animals reveals valuable information about their ecology and trophic relationships that may help elucidate dynamic interactions in ecosystems and forecast responses to environmental changes. Advances in molecular biology provide valuable research tools in this field. However, comparative empirical research is still required to highlight strengths and potential biases of different approaches. Therefore, this study compares environmental DNA and observational methods for the same study population and sampling duration. We employed DNA metabarcoding assays targeting plant and arthropod diet items in 823 fecal samples collected over 12 months in a wild population of an omnivorous primate, the vervet monkey ( Chlorocebus pygerythrus). DNA metabarcoding data were subsequently compared to direct observations. We observed the same seasonal patterns of plant consumption with both methods; however, DNA metabarcoding showed considerably greater taxonomic coverage and resolution compared to observations, mostly due to the construction of a local plant DNA database. We found a strong effect of season on variation in plant consumption largely shaped by the dry and wet seasons. The seasonal effect on arthropod consumption was weaker, but feeding on arthropods was more frequent in spring and summer, showing overall that vervets adapt their diet according to available resources. The DNA metabarcoding assay outperformed also direct observations of arthropod consumption in both taxonomic coverage and resolution. Combining traditional techniques and DNA metabarcoding data can therefore not only provide enhanced assessments of complex diets and trophic interactions to the benefit of wildlife conservationists and managers but also opens new perspectives for behavioral ecologists studying whether diet variation in social species is induced by environmental differences or might reflect selective foraging behaviors.

          Abstract

          In this study, we compare observational and eDNA methodologies for studying plant and arthropod diet items of wild vervet monkeys ( Chlorocebus pygerythrus). We observed the same seasonal patterns with both methods, however, DNA metabarcoding showed considerably greater taxonomic coverage and resolution compared to observations. The application of a DNA metabarcoding approach can be useful not only for conservation studies aimed at disentangling complex diets or reveal trophic interactions, but also opens new perspectives for behavioural ecologists studying social species in the wild.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Theade4Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.

              N Mantel (1967)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                luca.fumagalli@unil.ch
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                01 October 2022
                October 2022
                : 12
                : 10 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.v12.10 )
                : e9358
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Laboratory for Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
                [ 2 ] Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
                [ 3 ] Inkawu Vervet Project Mawana Game Reserve, Swart Mfolozi KwaZulu Natal South Africa
                [ 4 ] Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS Grenoble France
                [ 5 ] UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø Museum Tromsø Norway
                [ 6 ] Swiss Human Institute of Forensic Taphonomy, University Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne‐Geneva, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Luca Fumagalli, Laboratory for Conservation Biology, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

                Email: luca.fumagalli@ 123456unil.ch

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3009-9091
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2663-6130
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5875-0424
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-5954
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7778-418X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6648-2570
                Article
                ECE39358 ECE-2022-01-00065.R2
                10.1002/ece3.9358
                9526031
                36203642
                1551fd57-755b-4cd6-8770-6e479d5153d4
                © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 August 2022
                : 14 January 2022
                : 05 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Pages: 16, Words: 10171
                Funding
                Funded by: Branco‐Weiss Fellowship‐Society in Science
                Funded by: H2020 European Research Council , doi 10.13039/100010663;
                Award ID: 949379
                Funded by: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) , doi 10.13039/501100001711;
                Award ID: 310030_192512
                Award ID: PP00P3_170624
                Funded by: University of Lausanne , doi 10.13039/501100006390;
                Categories
                Behavioural Ecology
                Biodiversity Ecology
                Conservation Ecology
                Conservation Genetics
                Ecological Genetics
                Genetics
                Population Ecology
                Trophic Interactions
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                October 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.9 mode:remove_FC converted:01.10.2022

                Evolutionary Biology
                diet estimation,dna metabarcoding,environmental dna,method comparison,primates,seasonal variation

                Comments

                Comment on this article