6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Review and priority setting for substances that are listed without a specific migration limit in Table 1 of Annex 1 of Regulation 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids ( CEP) was requested by the European Commission to review the substances for which a Specific Migration Limit ( SML) is not assigned in Regulation ( EU) No 10/2011. These substances had been covered by the Generic SML of 60 mg/kg food, but with Regulation ( EU) 2016/1416 it was removed, necessitating their re‐examination. EFSA was requested to identify those substances requiring an SML to ensure the authorisation is sufficiently protective to health, grouping them in high, medium and low priority to serve as the basis for future re‐evaluations of individual substances. The CEP Panel established a stepwise procedure. This took into account existing hazard assessments for each substance on carcinogenicity/mutagenicity/reprotoxicity ( CMR), bioaccumulation and endocrine disruptor ( ED) properties along with the use of in silico generated predictions on genotoxicity. Molecular weights and boiling points were considered with regard to their effect on potential consumer exposure. This prioritisation procedure was applied to a total of 451 substances, from which 78 substances were eliminated at the outset, as they had previously been evaluated by EFSA as food contact substances. For 89 substances, the Panel concluded that a migration limit should not be needed. These are in the lists 0 and 1 of the Scientific Committee for Food ( SCF), defined as substances for which an Acceptable Daily Intake ( ADI) does not need to be established, along with substances that are controlled by existing restrictions and/or generic limits. Of the remaining 284 substances, 179 were placed into the low priority group, 102 were placed into the medium priority group and 3 were placed into the high priority group, i.e. salicylic acid ( FCM No 121), styrene ( FCM No 193) and lauric acid, vinyl ester ( FCM No 436).

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidance on selected default values to be used by the EFSA Scientific Committee, Scientific Panels and Units in the absence of actual measured data

          (2012)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Scientific Opinion on the re‐evaluation of aspartame (E 951) as a food additive

              (2013)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                FIP@efsa.europa.eu
                Journal
                EFSA J
                EFSA J
                10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732
                EFS2
                EFSA Journal
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1831-4732
                10 June 2020
                June 2020
                : 18
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/efs2.v18.6 )
                : e06124
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: FIP@ 123456efsa.europa.eu
                Article
                EFS26124
                10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6124
                7448095
                159ca0b2-eba0-4100-9e5b-3f19da49a040
                © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 16, Pages: 104, Words: 41258
                Categories
                Scientific Opinion
                Scientific Opinion
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.7 mode:remove_FC converted:26.08.2020

                food contact materials,prioritisation,safety assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article