385
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      RAD51C deletion screening identifies a recurrent gross deletion in breast cancer and ovarian cancer families

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RAD51C is an integral part of the DNA double-strand repair through homologous recombination, and monoallelic mutations were found in ~1.3% of BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer (BC) and/or ovarian cancer (OC) families [1]. Several studies confirmed the occurrence of RAD51C mutations predominantly in BC and/or OC families, although with varying frequencies, clearly establishing RAD51C as a cancer-predisposing gene [2-4]. There is ongoing debate whether pathogenic RAD51C alterations increase the relative risk for BC in addition to that for OC, which was estimated to be 5.88 (95% confidence interval = 2.91 to 11.88; P = 7.65 × 10–7) [2]. Elucidating the role of RAD51C in BC pathogenesis is hampered by the low frequency of clearly truncating RAD51C mutations. Deleterious alterations, as deduced by mutation type, are virtually absent in BC-only families, and very few BC cases with a BC/OC family history have been experimentally proven to carry a truncating RAD51C mutation [1-4]. In this study, we screened for gross genomic alterations within the RAD51C gene in BRCA1/2-negative familial BC index cases, 500 of which showing a BC-only family history and 325 a BC/OC family history. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and ethical approval was given by the Ethics Committee of the University of Cologne (07–185). We identified a large heterozygous RAD51C deletion encompassing exons 5 to 9 in two independent families (Figure 1A,B,C). In the first (family #1), remarkably a BC-only family (Figure 1A), the mutation carrier was affected by early-onset and bilateral BC (age 33 years, age 39 years). The deletion was inherited from the mother who was affected by colon cancer (age 44 years). In the second (family #2), a BC/OC family (Figure 1B), the mutation was identified in dizygotic twins, one of which was affected by early-onset BC (age 42 years) and one by early-onset OC (age 43 years). The 36,637 base pair deletion (Figure 1D,E,F) appears to be rare because we identified no further case in another large cohort by junction fragment polymerase chain reaction (BC only: 1,011; BC/OC: 203). Strikingly, all three RAD51C-positive breast tumors were classified as intermediate to high grade (individual #1-IV-2: G3, G3; individual #2-III-6: G2 to G3), invasive ductal, and triple negative. Figure 1 Identification and characterization of the RAD51C deletion. Identification of the RAD51C deletion: (A), (B) probands were recruited at the hereditary breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) centers in Cologne and Munich, Germany. Screening for genomic rearrangements was performed by employing a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay covering all nine coding exons of RAD51C as well as PALB2 and partially RAD50 (P260 MLPA probemix; MRC Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Deletions of exons 5 to 9 of the RAD51C gene were identified in two families (#1-IV-2; #2-III-6, #2-III-7) using blood-derived genomic DNA (gDNA). In both families, non-BC/OC entities were reported. BCL, B-cell lymphoma; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; CC, colon cancer; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma. (C) MLPA data analysis was carried out using Coffalyser.Net software (MRC Holland). Characterization of the RAD51C deletion: (D) a deletion-specific junction fragment polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the primers 5′-TCTCTGTGTCCTCATATGATAGG-3′ and 5′-CTAGGATCACACTATTGCACTC-3′. A 681 base pair (bp) fragment was observed using gDNA derived from individuals #1-IV-2, #2-III-6 and #2-III-7, but was absent in individual #1-IV-1, indicating maternal inheritance in family #1. NTC, no template control. (E) Sequencing of the junction fragment in all cases revealed a recurrent 36,637 bp deletion, which is flanked by Alu repeats. The genomic breakpoint within intron 4 is located in a 7 bp region identical between both flanking Alu sequences (indicated). Hence, the deletion probably originates from an Alu repeat-mediated nonhomologous recombination event. (F) Blood-derived RAD51C transcripts from individual #1-IV-2 and a control were analyzed by real-time PCR as described previously [6]. Primer sequences are available on request. Amplicons spanning exons 2/3 and 3/4 were detected at similar levels, while those spanning exons 7/8/9 and 8/9 were less abundant in patient #1-IV-2 compared with the respective control (***P <0.001, t test). Detection levels in the control sample were set to 100%. Results given as mean ± standard deviation. The early onset of BC in both families, the occurrence of bilateral BC and the triple-negative tumor phenotype resemble features closely associated with hereditary BC [5], and thus the presence of a clearly truncating mutation is supportive for a pathogenic role of RAD51C. Due to the low RAD51C mutation frequency, however, large collaborative studies are required to quantify the relative risk of RAD51C alterations for BC and potentially other cancer entities and, most importantly, to unravel genotype–phenotype correlations as well as genetic modifying factors that determine phenotypic variability with respect to cancer site and tumor subtype. Abbreviations BC: Breast cancer; OC: Ovarian cancer. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions BW, SE and KR participated in the study design and helped to draft the manuscript. AM, RKS and EH wrote the manuscript. GS, JH, NW-L, HH, LG, AB and GN performed the molecular genetic studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genetic susceptibility to triple-negative breast cancer.

          Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), defined by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 expression, account for 12% to 24% of all breast cancers. TNBC is associated with early recurrence of disease and poor outcome. Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility genes have been associated with up to 15% of TNBC, and TNBC accounts for 70% of breast tumors arising in BRCA1 mutation carriers and 16% to 23% of breast tumors in BRCA2 carriers. Whether germline mutations in other breast cancer susceptibility genes also predispose to TNBC remains to be determined. Common variation in a subset of the 72 known breast cancer susceptibility loci identified through genome-wide association studies and other large-scale genotyping efforts have also been associated with risk of TNBC (TOX3, ESR1, RAD51L1, TERT, 19p13.1, 20q11, MDM4, 2p24.1, and FTO). Furthermore, variation in the 19p13.1 locus and the MDM4 locus has been associated with TNBC, but not other forms of breast cancer, suggesting that these are TNBC-specific loci. Thus, TNBC can be distinguished from other breast cancer subtypes by a unique pattern of common and rare germline predisposition alleles. Additional efforts to combine genetic and epidemiologic data are needed to better understand the etiology of this aggressive form of breast cancer, to identify prevention and therapeutic targets, and to impact clinical practice through the development of risk prediction models. ©2012 AACR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            RAD51C is a susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer.

            A homozygous mutation in the RAD51C gene was recently found to cause Fanconi anemia-like disorder. Furthermore, six heterozygous deleterious RAD51C mutations were detected in German breast and ovarian cancer families. We screened 277 Finnish familial breast or ovarian cancer patients for RAD51C and identified two recurrent deleterious mutations (c.93delG and c.837+1G>A). These mutations were further genotyped in 491 familial breast cancer patients, 409 unselected ovarian cancer patients and two series of unselected breast cancer cases (884 from Helsinki and 686 from Tampere) and population controls (1279 and 807, respectively). The mutation frequency among all breast cancer cases was not different from the controls (4 out of 2239, 0.2% versus population controls 2 out of 2086, 0.1%, P= 0.7). In the Helsinki series, each mutation was found in four cases with personal or family history of ovarian cancer. No mutations were found among cases with familial breast cancer only, four out of the eight carriers did not have family history of breast cancer. The mutations associated with an increased risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer (OR: 13.59, 95% CI 1.89-97.6, P= 0.026 compared with controls), but especially with familial ovarian cancer in the absence of breast cancer (OR: 213, 95% CI 25.6-1769, P= 0.0002) and also with unselected ovarian cancer (OR: 6.31, 95% CI 1.15-34.6, P= 0.033), with a significantly higher mutation rate among the familial cases (two out of eight, 25%) than the unselected ovarian cancer cases (4 out of 409, 1%) (OR: 33.8, 95% CI 5.15-221, P= 0.005). These results suggest RAD51C as the first moderate-to-high risk susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Analysis of RAD51C germline mutations in high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families and ovarian cancer patients.

              There is strong evidence that overtly inactivating mutations in RAD51C predispose to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer but the prevalence of such mutations, and whether they are associated with a particular clinical phenotype, remains unclear. Resolving these questions has important implications for the implementation of RAD51C into routine clinical genetic testing. Consequently, we have performed a large RAD51C mutation screen of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families, and the first study of unselected patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Our data confirm a consistent but low frequency (2/335 families) of inactivating RAD51C mutations among families with a history of both breast and ovarian cancer and an absence of mutations among breast cancer only families (0/1,053 families). Our data also provide support for the designation of the missense variant p.Gly264Ser as a moderate penetrance allele. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Breast Cancer Res
                Breast Cancer Res
                Breast Cancer Research : BCR
                BioMed Central
                1465-5411
                1465-542X
                2013
                20 December 2013
                : 15
                : 6
                : R120
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center of Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
                [2 ]Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar at the Technical University, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
                [4 ]Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
                Article
                bcr3589
                10.1186/bcr3589
                3978715
                24359560
                15e0ae76-4e83-44fd-bd21-5dc42af97c68
                Copyright © 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.
                History
                Categories
                Letter

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article