5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New Perspective on Why Women Live Longer Than Men: An Exploration of Power, Gender, Social Determinants, and Capitals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Women live longer than men, even though many of the recognised social determinants of health are worse for women than men. No existing explanations account fully for these differences in life expectancy, although they do highlight the complexity and interaction of biological, social and health service factors. Methods: this paper is an exploratory explanation of gendered life expectancy difference (GLED) using a novel combination of epidemiological and sociological methods. We present the global picture of GLED. We then utilise a secondary data comparative case analysis offering explanations for GLED in Australia and Ethiopia. We combine a social determinant of health lens with Bourdieu’s concepts of capitals (economic, cultural, symbolic and social). Results: we confirmed continuing GLED in all countries ranging from less than a year to over 11 years. The Australian and Ethiopian cases demonstrated the complex factors underpinning this difference, highlighting similarities and differences in socioeconomic and cultural factors and how they are gendered within and between the countries. Bourdieu’s capitals enabled us to partially explain GLED and to develop a conceptual model of causal pathways. Conclusion: we demonstrate the value of combing a SDH and Bourdieu’s capital lens to investigate GLED. We proposed a theoretical framework to guide future research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references147

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review.

          Actual and perceived social isolation are both associated with increased risk for early mortality. In this meta-analytic review, our objective is to establish the overall and relative magnitude of social isolation and loneliness and to examine possible moderators. We conducted a literature search of studies (January 1980 to February 2014) using MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Social Work Abstracts, and Google Scholar. The included studies provided quantitative data on mortality as affected by loneliness, social isolation, or living alone. Across studies in which several possible confounds were statistically controlled for, the weighted average effect sizes were as follows: social isolation odds ratio (OR) = 1.29, loneliness OR = 1.26, and living alone OR = 1.32, corresponding to an average of 29%, 26%, and 32% increased likelihood of mortality, respectively. We found no differences between measures of objective and subjective social isolation. Results remain consistent across gender, length of follow-up, and world region, but initial health status has an influence on the findings. Results also differ across participant age, with social deficits being more predictive of death in samples with an average age younger than 65 years. Overall, the influence of both objective and subjective social isolation on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept

            R. Connell (2005)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                14 January 2021
                January 2021
                : 18
                : 2
                : 661
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Southgate Institute for Health, Society & Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia; connie.musolino@ 123456flinders.edu.au
                [2 ]College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide 5048, Australia; hailushepi@ 123456gmail.com
                [3 ]Epidemiology, School of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle 231, Ethiopia
                [4 ]Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK; j.popay@ 123456lancaster.ac.uk
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: fran.baum@ 123456flinders.edu.au ; Tel.: +61-8-72218410
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2294-1368
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-4400
                Article
                ijerph-18-00661
                10.3390/ijerph18020661
                7829786
                33466763
                17342921-4264-463f-929d-4a27cbfba337
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 November 2020
                : 08 January 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                gender inequities,health inequities,life expectancy,social determinants,ethiopia,australia,power,bourdieu,patriarchy

                Comments

                Comment on this article