8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Low-frequency electrical stimulation reduces cortical excitability in the human brain

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • 1 Hz electrical stimulation reduces post-stimulation cortical phase synchronization levels which is an indirect measure of cortical excitability.

          • Phase synchronization reduction is observed across alpha, beta, gamma, and high-gamma (105–195 Hz) frequency bands by 1 Hz stimulation.

          • Reduction of the phase synchronization levels due to 1 Hz electrical stimulation is significant in patients with stimulation sites in neocortex.

          • Reduction of the phase synchronization levels caused by 1 Hz electrical stimulation is widespread, yet more prominent in the stimulated hemisphere.

          Abstract

          Effective seizure control remains challenging for about 30% of epilepsy patients who are resistant to present-day pharmacotherapy. Novel approaches that not only reduce the severity and frequency of seizures, but also have limited side effects are therefore desirable. Accordingly, various neuromodulation approaches such as cortical electrical stimulation have been implemented to reduce seizure burden; however, the underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. Given that the initiation and spread of epileptic seizures critically depend on cortical excitability, understanding the neuromodulatory effects of cortical electrical stimulation on cortical excitability levels is paramount. Based on observations that synchronization in the electrocorticogram closely tracks brain excitability level, the effects of low-frequency (1 Hz) intracranial brain stimulation on the levels of cortical phase synchronization before, during, and after 1 Hz electrical stimulation were assessed in twelve patients. Analysis of phase synchronization levels across three broad frequency bands (1–45 Hz, 55–95 Hz, and 105–195 Hz) revealed that in patients with stimulation sites in the neocortex, phase synchronization levels were significantly reduced within the 55–95 Hz and 105–195 Hz bands during post-stimulation intervals compared to baseline; this effect persisted for at least 30 min post-stimulation. Similar effects were observed when phase synchronization levels were examined in the classic frequency bands, whereby a significant reduction was found during the post-stimulation intervals in the alpha, beta, and gamma bands. The anatomical extent of these effects was then assessed. Analysis of the results from six patients with intracranial electrodes in both hemispheres indicated that reductions in phase synchronization in the 1–45 Hz and 55–95 Hz frequency ranges were more prominent in the stimulated hemisphere. Overall, these findings demonstrate that low-frequency electrical stimulation reduces phase synchronization and hence cortical excitability in the human brain. Low-frequency stimulation of the epileptic focus may therefore contribute to the prevention of impending epileptic seizures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

          The physical basis for electrical stimulation of excitable tissue, as used by electrophysiological researchers and clinicians in functional electrical stimulation, is presented with emphasis on the fundamental mechanisms of charge injection at the electrode/tissue interface. Faradaic and non-Faradaic charge transfer mechanisms are presented and contrasted. An electrical model of the electrode/tissue interface is given. The physical basis for the origin of electrode potentials is given. Various methods of controlling charge delivery during pulsing are presented. Electrochemical reversibility is discussed. Commonly used electrode materials and stimulation protocols are reviewed in terms of stimulation efficacy and safety. Principles of stimulation of excitable tissue are reviewed with emphasis on efficacy and safety. Mechanisms of damage to tissue and the electrode are reviewed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Epilepsy: new advances.

            Epilepsy affects 65 million people worldwide and entails a major burden in seizure-related disability, mortality, comorbidities, stigma, and costs. In the past decade, important advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease and factors affecting its prognosis. These advances have translated into new conceptual and operational definitions of epilepsy in addition to revised criteria and terminology for its diagnosis and classification. Although the number of available antiepileptic drugs has increased substantially during the past 20 years, about a third of patients remain resistant to medical treatment. Despite improved effectiveness of surgical procedures, with more than half of operated patients achieving long-term freedom from seizures, epilepsy surgery is still done in a small subset of drug-resistant patients. The lives of most people with epilepsy continue to be adversely affected by gaps in knowledge, diagnosis, treatment, advocacy, education, legislation, and research. Concerted actions to address these challenges are urgently needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

              Electrical stimulation of nerve tissue and recording of neural electrical activity are the basis of emerging prostheses and treatments for spinal cord injury, stroke, sensory deficits, and neurological disorders. An understanding of the electrochemical mechanisms underlying the behavior of neural stimulation and recording electrodes is important for the development of chronically implanted devices, particularly those employing large numbers of microelectrodes. For stimulation, materials that support charge injection by capacitive and faradaic mechanisms are available. These include titanium nitride, platinum, and iridium oxide, each with certain advantages and limitations. The use of charge-balanced waveforms and maximum electrochemical potential excursions as criteria for reversible charge injection with these electrode materials are described and critiqued. Techniques for characterizing electrochemical properties relevant to stimulation and recording are described with examples of differences in the in vitro and in vivo response of electrodes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuroimage Clin
                Neuroimage Clin
                NeuroImage : Clinical
                Elsevier
                2213-1582
                28 July 2021
                2021
                28 July 2021
                : 31
                : 102778
                Affiliations
                [a ]Epilepsy Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [b ]Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [c ]Department of Neurology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
                [d ]BrainLinks-BrainTools, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [e ]Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [f ]Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [g ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
                [h ]Center for Basics in NeuroModulation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Article
                S2213-1582(21)00222-9 102778
                10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102778
                8358685
                34375883
                1747577d-e926-4924-9b6b-90212e4addc8
                © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 March 2021
                : 2 July 2021
                : 25 July 2021
                Categories
                Regular Article

                epilepsy,low-frequency electrical stimulation,phase synchronization,cortical excitability

                Comments

                Comment on this article