1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mental health services for German university students: acceptance of intervention targets and preference for delivery modes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Most university students with mental disorders remain untreated. Evaluating the acceptance of intervention targets in mental health treatment, promotion, and prevention, as well as mental health service delivery modes is crucial for reducing potential barriers, increasing healthcare utilization, and efficiently allocating resources in healthcare services.

          Aim

          The study aimed to evaluate the acceptance of various intervention targets and delivery modes of mental health care services in German first-year university students.

          Methods

          In total, 1,376 first-year students from two German universities from the 2017–2018 multi-center cross-sectional cohort of the StudiCare project, the German arm of the World Mental Health International College Student Survey initiative, completed a web-based survey assessing their mental health. Mental disorder status was based on self-reported data fulfilling the DSM-IV criteria. We report frequencies of accepted delivery modes [categories: group or in-person therapy with on or off campus services, self-help internet- or mobile-based intervention (IMI) with or without coaching, or a combination of a in-person and IMI (blended)]. In a multinomial logistic regression, we estimate correlates of the preference for in-person vs. IMI vs. a combination of both modes (blended) modalities. Additionally, we report frequencies of intervention targets (disorder specific: e.g., social phobia, depressive mood; study-related: test anxiety, procrastination; general well-being: sleep quality, resilience) their association with mental disorders and sex, and optimal combinations of treatment targets for each mental illness.

          Results

          German university students' acceptance is high for in-person (71%–76%), moderate for internet- and mobile-based (45%–55%), and low for group delivery modes (31%–36%). In-person treatment (72%) was preferred over IMI (19%) and blended modalities (9%). Having a mental disorder [odds ratio (OR): 1.56], believing that digital treatments are effective (OR: 3.2), and showing no intention to use services (OR: 2.8) were associated with a preference for IMI compared to in-person modes. Students with prior treatment experience preferred in-person modes (OR: 0.46). In general, treatment targets acceptance was higher among female students and students with mental disorders. However, this was not true for targets with the highest (i.e., procrastination) and the lowest (i.e., substance-use disorder) acceptance. If only two intervention targets were offered, a combination of study-related targets (i.e., procrastination, stress, time management) would reach 85%–88% of the students.

          Conclusion

          In-person services are preferred, yet half of the students consider using IMI, preferably aiming for a combination of at least two study-related intervention targets. Student mental health care services should offer a combination of accepted targets in different delivery modes to maximize service utilization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults.

          Research on suicide prevention and interventions requires a standard method for assessing both suicidal ideation and behavior to identify those at risk and to track treatment response. The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was designed to quantify the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior. The authors examined the psychometric properties of the scale. The C-SSRS's validity relative to other measures of suicidal ideation and behavior and the internal consistency of its intensity of ideation subscale were analyzed in three multisite studies: a treatment study of adolescent suicide attempters (N=124); a medication efficacy trial with depressed adolescents (N=312); and a study of adults presenting to an emergency department for psychiatric reasons (N=237). The C-SSRS demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity with other multi-informant suicidal ideation and behavior scales and had high sensitivity and specificity for suicidal behavior classifications compared with another behavior scale and an independent suicide evaluation board. Both the ideation and behavior subscales were sensitive to change over time. The intensity of ideation subscale demonstrated moderate to strong internal consistency. In the adolescent suicide attempters study, worst-point lifetime suicidal ideation on the C-SSRS predicted suicide attempts during the study, whereas the Scale for Suicide Ideation did not. Participants with the two highest levels of ideation severity (intent or intent with plan) at baseline had higher odds for attempting suicide during the study. These findings suggest that the C-SSRS is suitable for assessment of suicidal ideation and behavior in clinical and research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II.

            The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) has been developed from a six-country WHO collaborative project as a screening instrument for hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption. It is a 10-item questionnaire which covers the domains of alcohol consumption, drinking behaviour, and alcohol-related problems. Questions were selected from a 150-item assessment schedule (which was administered to 1888 persons attending representative primary health care facilities) on the basis of their representativeness for these conceptual domains and their perceived usefulness for intervention. Responses to each question are scored from 0 to 4, giving a maximum possible score of 40. Among those diagnosed as having hazardous or harmful alcohol use, 92% had an AUDIT score of 8 or more, and 94% of those with non-hazardous consumption had a score of less than 8. AUDIT provides a simple method of early detection of hazardous and harmful alcohol use in primary health care settings and is the first instrument of its type to be derived on the basis of a cross-national study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2297037/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/690532/overviewRole: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2232034/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/385425/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Digit Health
                Front Digit Health
                Front. Digit. Health
                Frontiers in Digital Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2673-253X
                14 February 2024
                2024
                : 6
                : 1284661
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]TUM School of Medicine and Health, Professorship Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Technische Universität München , Munich, Germany
                [ 2 ]Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University , Perth, WA, Australia
                [ 3 ]Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University , Ulm, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany

                Reviewed by: Markus Wolf, University of Zurich, Switzerland

                Gwendolyn Mayer, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany

                [* ] Correspondence: Fanny Kählke fanny.kaehlke@ 123456tum.de
                Article
                10.3389/fdgth.2024.1284661
                10903098
                38426046
                17f9e37f-dc8b-4cd0-8fd5-aa9c744c6c4b
                © 2024 Kählke, Hasking, Küchler and Baumeister.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 August 2023
                : 22 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 76, Pages: 0, Words: 0
                Funding
                The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                The project was funded by BARMER, a major statutory health care insurance company in Germany. BARMER had no role in study design, decision to publish or preparation of this manuscript. BARMER was/is not involved in data collection, analyses, decision to publish, or preparation of future papers regarding the StudiCare project.
                Categories
                Digital Health
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Digital Mental Health

                acceptance,delivery modes,intervention targets,university students,internet- and mobile-based interventions,preference,mental health care service use

                Comments

                Comment on this article