66
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brain Response to a Humanoid Robot in Areas Implicated in the Perception of Human Emotional Gestures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The humanoid robot WE4-RII was designed to express human emotions in order to improve human-robot interaction. We can read the emotions depicted in its gestures, yet might utilize different neural processes than those used for reading the emotions in human agents.

          Methodology

          Here, fMRI was used to assess how brain areas activated by the perception of human basic emotions (facial expression of Anger, Joy, Disgust) and silent speech respond to a humanoid robot impersonating the same emotions, while participants were instructed to attend either to the emotion or to the motion depicted.

          Principal Findings

          Increased responses to robot compared to human stimuli in the occipital and posterior temporal cortices suggest additional visual processing when perceiving a mechanical anthropomorphic agent. In contrast, activity in cortical areas endowed with mirror properties, like left Broca's area for the perception of speech, and in the processing of emotions like the left anterior insula for the perception of disgust and the orbitofrontal cortex for the perception of anger, is reduced for robot stimuli, suggesting lesser resonance with the mechanical agent. Finally, instructions to explicitly attend to the emotion significantly increased response to robot, but not human facial expressions in the anterior part of the left inferior frontal gyrus, a neural marker of motor resonance.

          Conclusions

          Motor resonance towards a humanoid robot, but not a human, display of facial emotion is increased when attention is directed towards judging emotions.

          Significance

          Artificial agents can be used to assess how factors like anthropomorphism affect neural response to the perception of human actions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.

          Anthropomorphism describes the tendency to imbue the real or imagined behavior of nonhuman agents with humanlike characteristics, motivations, intentions, or emotions. Although surprisingly common, anthropomorphism is not invariant. This article describes a theory to explain when people are likely to anthropomorphize and when they are not, focused on three psychological determinants--the accessibility and applicability of anthropocentric knowledge (elicited agent knowledge), the motivation to explain and understand the behavior of other agents (effectance motivation), and the desire for social contact and affiliation (sociality motivation). This theory predicts that people are more likely to anthropomorphize when anthropocentric knowledge is accessible and applicable, when motivated to be effective social agents, and when lacking a sense of social connection to other humans. These factors help to explain why anthropomorphism is so variable; organize diverse research; and offer testable predictions about dispositional, situational, developmental, and cultural influences on anthropomorphism. Discussion addresses extensions of this theory into the specific psychological processes underlying anthropomorphism, applications of this theory into robotics and human-computer interaction, and the insights offered by this theory into the inverse process of dehumanization. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neurobiology of emotion perception I: The neural basis of normal emotion perception.

            There is at present limited understanding of the neurobiological basis of the different processes underlying emotion perception. We have aimed to identify potential neural correlates of three processes suggested by appraisalist theories as important for emotion perception: 1) the identification of the emotional significance of a stimulus; 2) the production of an affective state in response to 1; and 3) the regulation of the affective state. In a critical review, we have examined findings from recent animal, human lesion, and functional neuroimaging studies. Findings from these studies indicate that these processes may be dependent upon the functioning of two neural systems: a ventral system, including the amygdala, insula, ventral striatum, and ventral regions of the anterior cingulate gyrus and prefrontal cortex, predominantly important for processes 1 and 2 and automatic regulation of emotional responses; and a dorsal system, including the hippocampus and dorsal regions of anterior cingulate gyrus and prefrontal cortex, predominantly important for process 3. We suggest that the extent to which a stimulus is identified as emotive and is associated with the production of an affective state may be dependent upon levels of activity within these two neural systems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust.

              What neural mechanism underlies the capacity to understand the emotions of others? Does this mechanism involve brain areas normally involved in experiencing the same emotion? We performed an fMRI study in which participants inhaled odorants producing a strong feeling of disgust. The same participants observed video clips showing the emotional facial expression of disgust. Observing such faces and feeling disgust activated the same sites in the anterior insula and to a lesser extent in the anterior cingulate cortex. Thus, as observing hand actions activates the observer's motor representation of that action, observing an emotion activates the neural representation of that emotion. This finding provides a unifying mechanism for understanding the behaviors of others.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2010
                21 July 2010
                : 5
                : 7
                : e11577
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Mediterranean Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience (INCM), Aix-Marseille University – CNRS, Marseille, France
                [3 ]Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Consolidated Research Institute for Advanced Science and Medical Care (ASMeW), Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
                [4 ]Humanoid Robotics Institute (HRI), Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
                [5 ]Italy-Japan Joint Laboratory on Humanoid and Personal Robotics “RoboCasa”, Tokyo, Japan
                [6 ]University College London Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
                [7 ]Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
                [8 ]Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Aarhus University Hospital, Århus, Denmark
                [9 ]Advanced Robotics Technology and Systems Laboratory (ARTS Lab), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
                [10 ]Neuroprosthesis Control Group, Institute for Automation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ), Zurich, Switzerland
                [11 ]Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Sezione di Fisiologia, Università di Parma, Parma, Italy
                [12 ]Italian Institute of Technology (IIT), Brain Center for Social and Motor Cognition, Parma, Italy
                Kyushu University, Japan
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: TC SJB AT CDF SM GR VG MAU. Performed the experiments: TC. Analyzed the data: TC SJB CDF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MZ AT VG MAU. Wrote the paper: TC SJB CDF VG MAU. Initiated the project: AT SM PD GR VG MAU.

                Article
                10-PONE-RA-16443R1
                10.1371/journal.pone.0011577
                2908128
                20657777
                17ff278b-4596-4d2b-96f7-90ce2797c04d
                Chaminade et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 19 February 2010
                : 7 June 2010
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Research Article
                Neuroscience
                Neuroscience/Cognitive Neuroscience
                Neuroscience/Sensory Systems

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article