0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Guselkumab provides durable improvement across psoriatic arthritis disease domains: post hoc analysis of a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Evaluate long-term guselkumab effectiveness across Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-recognised domains/related conditions of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

          Methods

          Post hoc analyses used data from DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285) biologic/Janus-kinase inhibitor-naïve participants with active PsA (≥5 swollen/≥5 tender joints, C-reactive protein ≥0.6 mg/dL), randomised (1:1:1) to guselkumab every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) or placebo with crossover to guselkumab. Outcomes aligned with key GRAPPA-recognised domains of overall disease activity, peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis/dactylitis and skin psoriasis (nail psoriasis was not evaluated). PsA-related conditions (inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)/uveitis) were assessed via adverse events through W112. Least squares mean changes from baseline through W100 in continuous outcomes employed repeated measures mixed-effects models adjusting for baseline scores. Binary measure response rates were determined with non-responder imputation for missing data.

          Results

          442/493 (90%) of guselkumab-randomised patients completed treatment through W100. Following early reductions in disease activity with guselkumab, durable improvements were observed across key PsA domains (swollen/tender joints, psoriasis, spinal pain, enthesitis/dactylitis) through W100. Response rates of therapeutically relevant targets generally increased through W100 with guselkumab Q4W/Q8W: Disease Activity Index for PsA low disease activity (LDA) 62%/59%, enthesitis resolution 61%/70%, dactylitis resolution 72%/83%, 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 59%/53%, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score LDA 51%/49% and minimal disease activity 38%/40%. Through W112, no cases of IBD developed among guselkumab-randomised patients and one case of uveitis was reported.

          Conclusion

          In biologic-naïve patients with active PsA, guselkumab provided early and durable improvements in key GRAPPA-recognised domains through 2 years, with substantial proportions achieving important treatment targets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update

          Objective To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was followed by a consensus meeting to develop this update involving 28 international taskforce members in May 2019. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined. Results The updated recommendations comprise 6 overarching principles and 12 recommendations. The overarching principles address the nature of PsA and diversity of both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations; the need for collaborative management and shared decision-making is highlighted. The recommendations provide a treatment strategy for pharmacological therapies. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local glucocorticoid injections are proposed as initial therapy; for patients with arthritis and poor prognostic factors, such as polyarthritis or monoarthritis/oligoarthritis accompanied by factors such as dactylitis or joint damage, rapid initiation of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is recommended. If the treatment target is not achieved with this strategy, a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) targeting tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-17A or IL-12/23 should be initiated, taking into account skin involvement if relevant. If axial disease predominates, a TNF inhibitor or IL-17A inhibitor should be started as first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors is addressed primarily after bDMARD failure. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition is proposed for patients in whom these other drugs are inappropriate, generally in the context of mild disease. Drug switches and tapering in sustained remission are addressed. Conclusion These recommendations provide stakeholders with an updated consensus on the pharmacological management of PsA, based on a combination of evidence and expert opinion.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome.

            Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been defined as a unique inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis. Its exact prevalence is unknown, but estimates vary from 0.3% to 1% of the population. The clinical features described initially are recognised by most experienced clinicians, although they are most distinct in early disease. Initially, PsA typically presents as an oligoarticular and mild disease. However, with time PsA becomes polyarticular, and it is a severe disease in at least 20% of patients. Patients with PsA who present with polyarticular disease are at risk for disease progression. In addition to progression of clinical and radiological damage, health related quality of life is reduced among patients with PsA. It important to note that patients included in recent drug trials resemble patients followed prospectively in a clinic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index.

              Disease status, in terms of disease activity, disease progression and prognosis is difficult to define in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). No gold standard exists. Therefore, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), a self-administered instrument, has been developed as a new approach to defining disease activity in patients with AS. The index, designed by a multidisciplinary team with input from patients, consists of six 10 cm horizontal visual analog scales to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness (both qualitative and quantitative). The final BASDAI score has a range of 0 to 10. The index was distributed to a cross section of patients, including inpatients receiving 3 weeks of intensive physiotherapy treatment and hospital outpatients. BASDAI was completed by a total of 154 patients. Validation of the new instrument was achieved through analysis of user friendliness, reliability (consistency), score distribution and sensitivity to change. Comparisons were made with a previous Bath disease activity index (DAI) and the Newcastle Enthesis Index. The BASDAI was found by patients to be quick and simple to complete (mean: 67 s). Test-retest reliability was good (r = 0.93; p < 0.001), as was the distribution of scores across the scale (score range: 0.5-10; mean: 4.31). BASDAI was sensitive to change, reflecting a 16% (mean) improvement in inpatient scores after 3 weeks of treatment. It is superior to the DAI in terms of construct and content validity and to the Enthesis Index in all aspects. In summary, BASDAI is user friendly, reliability, sensitive to change and reflects the entire spectrum of disease. It is a comprehensive self-administered instrument for assessing disease activity in AS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                RMD Open
                RMD Open
                rmdopen
                rmdopen
                RMD Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2056-5933
                2024
                26 March 2024
                : 10
                : 1
                : e003977
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences , Ringgold_6396University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [2 ] departmentINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique , Ringgold_27063Sorbonne Universite , Paris, France
                [3 ] departmentRheumatology Department , AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital , Paris, France
                [4 ] departmentImmunology , Janssen Medical Affairs, LLC , Zug, Switzerland
                [5 ] departmentImmunology , Ringgold_241857Janssen Research & Development LLC , Titusville, New Jersey, USA
                [6 ] departmentScientific Affairs , JSS Medical Research Inc , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [7 ] Ringgold_5620McGill University , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [8 ] departmentDepartment of Community Health & Epidemiology , Ringgold_7235University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
                [9 ] Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC , Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA
                [10 ] Ringgold_6808Janssen Research & Development LLC , San Diego, California, USA
                [11 ] Ringgold_5723Griffith University , Nathan, Queensland, Australia
                [12 ] Ringgold_1974The University of Queensland , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [13 ] Rheumatology Research, Providence Swedish Medical Center , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [14 ] Ringgold_7284University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [15 ] departmentLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine , Ringgold_4468University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Laura C Coates; laura.coates@ 123456ndorms.ox.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-663X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-310X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-3000
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-8246
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2571-788X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-0457
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-9105
                Article
                rmdopen-2023-003977
                10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003977
                10966800
                38531621
                1836888c-6719-4757-8b57-5e3d3e3408ca
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 05 December 2023
                : 08 February 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA;
                Categories
                Psoriatic Arthritis
                1506
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                psoriatic arthritis,biological therapy,severity of illness index

                Comments

                Comment on this article