8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevalence and risk factors of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair: A meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the current evidence on risk factors for type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

          Materials and methods

          A systematic literature search was carried out for studies that evaluated the association of demographic, co-morbidity, and other patient-determined factors with the onset of type II endoleaks. Pooled prevalence of type II endoleaks after EVAR was updated.

          Results

          Among the 504 studies screened, 45 studies with a total of 36,588 participants were included in this review. The pooled prevalence of type II endoleaks after EVAR was 22% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19%–25%]. The main factors consistently associated with type II endoleaks included age [pooled odds ratio (OR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.31–0.43; P<0.001], smoking (pooled OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55–0.92; P<0.001), patent inferior mesenteric artery (pooled OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.06–3.71; P = 0.012), maximum aneurysm diameter (pooled OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.30; P<0.001), and number of patent lumbar arteries (pooled OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 2.81–3.33; P<0.001). Sex, diabetes, hypertension, anticoagulants, antiplatelet, hyperlipidemia, chronic renal insufficiency, types of graft material, and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) did not show any association with the onset of type II endoleaks.

          Conclusions

          Clinicians can use the identified risk factors to detect and manage patients at risk of developing type II endoleaks after EVAR. However, further studies are needed to analyze a number of potential risk factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial.

            Limited data are available to assess whether endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) improves short-term outcomes compared with traditional open repair. To compare postoperative outcomes up to 2 years after endovascular or open repair of AAA in a planned interim report of a 9-year trial. A randomized, multicenter clinical trial of 881 veterans (aged > or = 49 years) from 42 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers with eligible AAA who were candidates for both elective endovascular repair and open repair of AAA. The trial is ongoing and this report describes the period between October 15, 2002, and October 15, 2008. Elective endovascular (n = 444) or open (n = 437) repair of AAA. Procedure failure, secondary therapeutic procedures, length of stay, quality of life, erectile dysfunction, major morbidity, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 1.8 years. Perioperative mortality (30 days or inpatient) was lower for endovascular repair (0.5% vs 3.0%; P = .004), but there was no significant difference in mortality at 2 years (7.0% vs 9.8%, P = .13). Patients in the endovascular repair group had reduced median procedure time (2.9 vs 3.7 hours), blood loss (200 vs 1000 mL), transfusion requirement (0 vs 1.0 units), duration of mechanical ventilation (3.6 vs 5.0 hours), hospital stay (3 vs 7 days), and intensive care unit stay (1 vs 4 days), but required substantial exposure to fluoroscopy and contrast. There were no differences between the 2 groups in major morbidity, procedure failure, secondary therapeutic procedures, aneurysm-related hospitalizations, health-related quality of life, or erectile function. In this report of short-term outcomes after elective AAA repair, perioperative mortality was low for both procedures and lower for endovascular than open repair. The early advantage of endovascular repair was not offset by increased morbidity or mortality in the first 2 years after repair. Longer-term outcome data are needed to fully assess the relative merits of the 2 procedures. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094575.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition.

              The aim of the study was to determine whether type II endoleak (T2E) after endovascular repair of abdominal aorta (EVAR) is a benign condition (ie, not associated with growth, reintervention, rupture, or death).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                9 February 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 2
                : e0170600
                Affiliations
                [001]Department of Vascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
                Medical University Innsbruck, AUSTRIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: QG XD JZ.

                • Formal analysis: QG XD JZ YM BH DY YY GZ FX.

                • Investigation: QG XD JZ YM BH DY YY GZ FX.

                • Methodology: QG XD JZ.

                • Supervision: JZ.

                • Writing – original draft: QG XD JZ.

                • Writing – review & editing: QG XD JZ YM BH DY YY GZ FX.

                Article
                PONE-D-16-33408
                10.1371/journal.pone.0170600
                5300210
                28182753
                1ad9f64e-5d22-4328-be08-310caf0f904e
                © 2017 Guo et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 21 August 2016
                : 7 January 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 13
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Vascular Medicine
                Vascular Diseases
                Aneurysms
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Meta-Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Meta-Analysis
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Cardiovascular Anatomy
                Blood Vessels
                Arteries
                Mesenteric Arteries
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Cardiovascular Anatomy
                Blood Vessels
                Arteries
                Mesenteric Arteries
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Systematic Reviews
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Cardiovascular Anatomy
                Blood Vessels
                Arteries
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Cardiovascular Anatomy
                Blood Vessels
                Arteries
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Endocrinology
                Endocrine Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Metabolic Disorders
                Diabetes Mellitus
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Hyperlipidemia
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Hyperlipidemia
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article