3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Preparation and Protonation of Fe2(pdt)(CNR)6, Electron-Rich Analogues of Fe2(pdt)(CO)6

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">The complexes Fe <sub>2</sub> (pdt)(CNR) <sub>6</sub> (pdt <sup>2−</sup> = CH <sub>2</sub>(CH <sub>2</sub>S <sup>−</sup>) <sub>2</sub>) were prepared by thermal substitution of the hexacarbonyl complex with the isocyanides RNC for R = C <sub>6</sub>H <sub>4</sub>-4-OMe ( <b>1</b>), C <sub>6</sub>H <sub>4</sub>-4-Cl ( <b>2</b>), Me ( <b>3</b>). These complexes represent electron-rich analogues of the parent Fe <sub>2</sub>(pdt)(CO) <sub>6</sub>. Unlike most substituted derivatives of Fe <sub>2</sub>(pdt)(CO) <sub>6</sub>, these isocyanide complexes are sterically unencumbered and have the same idealized symmetry as the parent hexacarbonyl derivatives. Like the hexacarbonyls, the stereodynamics of <b>1</b>– <b>3</b> involve both turnstile rotation of the Fe(CNR) <sub>3</sub> as well as the inversion of the chair conformation of the pdt ligand. Structural studies indicate that the basal isocyanide has nonlinear CNC bonds and short Fe–C distances, indicating that they engage in stronger Fe–C <i>π</i>-backbonding than the apical ligands. Cyclic voltammetry reveals that these new complexes are far more reducing than the hexacarbonyls, although the redox behavior is complex. Estimated reduction potentials are <i>E</i> <sub>1/2</sub> ≈ −0.6 ([ <b>2</b>] <sup>+/0</sup>), −0.7 ([ <b>1</b>] <sup>+/0</sup>), and −1.25 ([ <b>3</b>] <sup>+/0</sup>). According to DFT calculations, the rotated isomer of <b>3</b> is only 2.2 kcal/mol higher in energy than the crystallographically observed unrotated structure. The effects of rotated versus unrotated structure and of solvent coordination (THF, MeCN) on redox potentials were assessed computationally. These factors shift the redox couple by as much as 0.25 V, usually less. Compounds <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> protonate with strong acids to give the expected <i>μ</i>-hydrides [H <b>1</b>] <sup>+</sup> and [H <b>2</b>] <sup>+</sup>. In contrast, <b>3</b> protonates with [HNEt <sub>3</sub>]BAr <sup>F</sup> <sub>4</sub> (p <i>K</i> <sub>a</sub> <sup>MeCN</sup> = 18.7) to give the aminocarbyne [Fe <sub>2</sub>(pdt)(CNMe) <sub>5</sub>( <i>μ</i>-CN(H)Me)] <sup>+</sup> ([ <b>3</b>H] <sup>+</sup>). According to NMR measurements and DFT calculations, this species adopts an unsymmetrical, rotated structure. DFT calculations further indicate that the previously described carbyne complex [Fe <sub>2</sub>(SMe) <sub>2</sub>(CO) <sub>3</sub>(PMe <sub>3</sub>) <sub>2</sub>(CCF <sub>3</sub>)] <sup>+</sup> also adopts a rotated structure with a bridging carbyne ligand. Complex [ <b>3</b>H] <sup>+</sup> reversibly adds MeNC to give [Fe <sub>2</sub>(pdt)(CNR) <sub>6</sub>( <i>μ</i>-CN(H)Me)] <sup>+</sup> ([ <b>3</b>H(CNMe)] <sup>+</sup>). Near room temperature, [ <b>3</b>H] <sup>+</sup> isomerizes to the hydride [( <i>μ</i>-H)Fe <sub>2</sub>(pdt)(CNMe) <sub>6</sub>] <sup>+</sup> ([H <b>3</b>] <sup>+</sup>) via a first-order pathway. </p><p id="P2"> <div class="figure-container so-text-align-c"> <img alt="" class="figure" src="/document_file/d1a02ffc-13a4-4a8a-aa3f-a6f0d1eba003/PubMedCentral/image/nihms767327u1.jpg"/> </div> </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Inorganic Chemistry
          Inorg. Chem.
          American Chemical Society (ACS)
          0020-1669
          1520-510X
          March 14 2016
          April 04 2016
          March 21 2016
          April 04 2016
          : 55
          : 7
          : 3401-3412
          Affiliations
          [1 ]School of Chemical Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign, 600 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
          [2 ]Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano—Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, 20126 Milan, Italy
          Article
          10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02789
          4821816
          26999632
          1aeff629-bbe1-40d9-b3a6-b17727f5c7cf
          © 2016
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article