1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Feasibility of using a transmission ion chamber for QA tests of medical linear accelerators

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To study the feasibility of using the Integral Quality Monitoring (IQM) system for routine quality assurance (QA) of photon beams.

          Methods

          The IQM system is a commercially available dose delivery verification tool, which consists of a spatially sensitive large area transmission ion chamber, mounted on the Linac collimator, and a calculation algorithm to predict the signals in response to radiation beams. By comparing the measured and predicted signals the system verifies the accuracy of beam delivery. The ion chamber unit is a battery powered system including a dual‐electrometer, temperature and pressure sensors, and inclinometers. The feasibility of using the IQM system for routine QA tests was investigated by measuring constancy values of beam parameters, with specially designed tests fields, and comparing them with those determined by a conventional system.

          Results

          The sensitivity of the beam output constancy measurements by the IQM system was found to agree with those measured by a Farmer type ion chamber placed in water phantoms to within 0.1% for typical daily output variation of ± 0.5% and ± 1%. The beam symmetry was measured with a 4 cm × 4 cm aperture at multiple off‐axis distances and was found to have a highly linear relationship with those measured in a water phantom scan for intentionally introduced asymmetry between ‐3% and +3%. The beam flatness was measured with a two‐field ratio method and was found to be linearly correlated with those measured by water phantom scan. The dosimetric equivalent of a picket fence test performed by the IQM system can serve as a constancy check of the multileaf collimator (MLC) bank positioning test.

          Conclusions

          The IQM system has been investigated for constancy measurements of various beam parameters for photon beams. The results suggest that the system can be used for most of the routine QA tests effectively and efficiently.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

          The task group (TG) for quality assurance of medical accelerators was constituted by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Science Council under the direction of the Radiation Therapy Committee and the Quality Assurance and Outcome Improvement Subcommittee. The task group (TG-142) had two main charges. First to update, as needed, recommendations of Table II of the AAPM TG-40 report on quality assurance and second, to add recommendations for asymmetric jaws, multileaf collimation (MLC), and dynamic/virtual wedges. The TG accomplished the update to TG-40, specifying new test and tolerances, and has added recommendations for not only the new ancillary delivery technologies but also for imaging devices that are part of the linear accelerator. The imaging devices include x-ray imaging, photon portal imaging, and cone-beam CT. The TG report was designed to account for the types of treatments delivered with the particular machine. For example, machines that are used for radiosurgery treatments or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) require different tests and/or tolerances. There are specific recommendations for MLC quality assurance for machines performing IMRT. The report also gives recommendations as to action levels for the physicists to implement particular actions, whether they are inspection, scheduled action, or immediate and corrective action. The report is geared to be flexible for the physicist to customize the QA program depending on clinical utility. There are specific tables according to daily, monthly, and annual reviews, along with unique tables for wedge systems, MLC, and imaging checks. The report also gives specific recommendations regarding setup of a QA program by the physicist in regards to building a QA team, establishing procedures, training of personnel, documentation, and end-to-end system checks. The tabulated items of this report have been considerably expanded as compared with the original TG-40 report and the recommended tolerances accommodate differences in the intended use of the machine functionality (non-IMRT, IMRT, and stereotactic delivery).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An integral quality monitoring system for real-time verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy.

              To develop an independent and on-line beam monitoring system, which can validate the accuracy of segment-by-segment energy fluence delivery for each treatment field. The system is also intended to be utilized for pretreatment dosimetric quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), on-line image-guided adaptive radiation therapy, and volumetric modulated arc therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Makan.farrokhkish@rmp.uhn.ca
                Journal
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                J Appl Clin Med Phys
                10.1002/(ISSN)1526-9914
                ACM2
                Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1526-9914
                09 January 2024
                February 2024
                : 25
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/acm2.v25.2 )
                : e14245
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Medical Physics Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto Ontario Canada
                [ 2 ] Department of Radiation Oncology Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Radiation Oncology Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Radiation Oncology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Makan Farrokhkish, Room 2‐F11‐1 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.

                Email: Makan.farrokhkish@ 123456rmp.uhn.ca

                Article
                ACM214245
                10.1002/acm2.14245
                10962482
                38194595
                1b02ed2d-2651-414c-a927-111a25e0fcc8
                © 2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 December 2023
                : 27 June 2023
                : 14 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 4, Pages: 14, Words: 7633
                Categories
                Radiation Measurements
                Radiation Measurements
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.0 mode:remove_FC converted:25.03.2024

                iqm,linac qa,transmission chamber
                iqm, linac qa, transmission chamber

                Comments

                Comment on this article