10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparative open, randomized, cross-over bioequivalence study of two intravenous dexrazoxane formulations (Cardioxane and ICRF-187) in patients with advanced breast cancer, treated with 5-fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (FDC).

      European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
      Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, blood, Biological Availability, Breast Neoplasms, metabolism, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Cross-Over Studies, Cyclophosphamide, therapeutic use, Doxorubicin, Drug Interactions, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Razoxane

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic disposition of two intravenous dexrazoxane formulations, and their effects on doxorubicin's kinetics and metabolism. Plasma concentration versus time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters of dexrazoxane given as Cardioxane (dexrazoxane hydrochloride salt) and ICRF-187 reference formulation (dexrazoxane base) were determined and compared. Both formulations were administered as a single intravenous infusion prior to 5-fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide administration. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and its metabolites were studied after dexrazoxane administration. A total of 15 patients with advanced breast cancer participated in this open, randomized, cross-over study and 12 patients were evaluable. Plasma concentrations of dexrazoxane, doxorubicin and doxorubicin metabolites were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography in samples obtained in the 72 h after drug administration. No statistically significant differences were found in the tested kinetic parameters when the two products were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) on log-transformed data. Cardioxane fulfilled the bioequivalence criteria when compared with ICRF-187 reference formulation for all of the investigated parameters (AUC, t1/2beta, Vdss, Cl(tot), Cl(ren)). The parametric 90% confidence intervals were contained within the bioequivalence interval (0.8-1.25). Pharmacokinetic parameters and metabolism of doxorubicin were not different after the administration of either Cardioxane or ICRF-187 formulation. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the two formulations can be considered bioequivalent with regard to extent of absorption (AUC and Vdss) and elimination (t1/2beta, Cl(tot) and Cl(ren)).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article