15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      ‘What we’ve tried, hasn’t worked’: the politics of assets based public health1

      Critical Public Health
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence.

          Whether or not the scale of a society's income inequality is a determinant of population health is still regarded as a controversial issue. We decided to review the evidence and see if we could find a consistent interpretation of both the positive and negative findings. We identified 168 analyses in 155 papers reporting research findings on the association between income distribution and population health, and classified them according to how far their findings supported the hypothesis that greater income differences are associated with lower standards of population health. Analyses in which all adjusted associations between greater income equality and higher standards of population health were statistically significant and positive were classified as "wholly supportive"; if none were significant and positive they were classified as "unsupportive"; and if some but not all were significant and supportive they were classified as "partially supportive". Of those classified as either wholly supportive or unsupportive, a large majority (70 per cent) suggest that health is less good in societies where income differences are bigger. There were substantial differences in the proportion of supportive findings according to whether inequality was measured in large or small areas. We suggest that the studies of income inequality are more supportive in large areas because in that context income inequality serves as a measure of the scale of social stratification, or how hierarchical a society is. We suggest three explanations for the unsupportive findings reported by a minority of studies. First, many studies measured inequality in areas too small to reflect the scale of social class differences in a society; second, a number of studies controlled for factors which, rather than being genuine confounders, are likely either to mediate between class and health or to be other reflections of the scale of social stratification; and third, the international relationship was temporarily lost (in all but the youngest age groups) during the decade from the mid-1980s when income differences were widening particularly rapidly in a number of countries. We finish by discussing possible objections to our interpretation of the findings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A glossary for social epidemiology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The economics of linguistic exchanges

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Critical Public Health
                Critical Public Health
                Informa UK Limited
                0958-1596
                1469-3682
                June 2013
                June 2013
                : 23
                : 2
                : 131-145
                Article
                10.1080/09581596.2012.748882
                1eab9323-b897-4276-9296-d12e60414512
                © 2013
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article