31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Water vs. cucurbituril rim: a fierce competition for guest solvation†

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Remote substituents on cucurbit[7]uril-bound guests are used to decipher the fierce competition between water and the carbonylated portal of the macrocycle for guest stabilization.

          Abstract

          The impact of remote substituents on the affinity of cucurbit[ n]urils (CB[ n]) towards a homologous series of guests, which differ from one another only by a single substituent, and adopt the same geometry within the cavity of the macrocycle, is presented for the first time, and is used to decipher the competition between water and the carbonylated portal of CB[7] for the stabilization of positively charged guests. Binding affinities of CB[7] towards substituted N-benzyl-trimethylsilylmethylammonium cations relative to the unsubstituted member (X = H) range from 0.9 (X = CH 3) to 3.1 (X = SO 2CF 3), and correlate very precisely with a linear combination of Swain–Lupton field/inductive ( F; 67%) and resonance ( R; 33%) parameters tabulated for each substituent. We show that this subtle sensitivity results exclusively from the balance between two competing mechanisms, on which the substituents exert an approximately 11 times greater impact: (1) the solvation of the ammonium unit and its immediate surroundings by water in the free guests, and (2) the coulombic attraction between the ammonium unit and the rim of CB[7] in the complexes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The cucurbit[n]uril family.

            In 1981, the macrocyclic methylene-bridged glycoluril hexamer (CB[6]) was dubbed "cucurbituril" by Mock and co-workers because of its resemblance to the most prominent member of the cucurbitaceae family of plants--the pumpkin. In the intervening years, the fundamental binding properties of CB[6]-high affinity, highly selective, and constrictive binding interactions--have been delineated by the pioneering work of the research groups of Mock, Kim, and Buschmann, and has led to their applications in waste-water remediation, as artificial enzymes, and as molecular switches. More recently, the cucurbit[n]uril family has grown to include homologues (CB[5]-CB[10]), derivatives, congeners, and analogues whose sizes span and exceed the range available with the alpha-, beta-, and gamma-cyclodextrins. Their shapes, solubility, and chemical functionality may now be tailored by synthetic chemistry to play a central role in molecular recognition, self-assembly, and nanotechnology. This Review focuses on the synthesis, recognition properties, and applications of these unique macrocycles.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The cucurbit[n]uril family: prime components for self-sorting systems.

              We determined the values of Ka for a wide range of host-guest complexes of cucurbit[n]uril (CB[n]), where n = 6-8, using 1H NMR competition experiments referenced to absolute binding constants measured by UV/vis titration. We find that the larger homologues--CB[7] and CB[8]--individually maintain the size, shape, and functional group selectivity that typifies the recognition behavior of CB[6]. The cavity of CB[7] is found to effectively host trimethylsilyl groups. Remarkably, the values of Ka for the interaction of CB[7] with adamantane derivatives 22-24 exceeds 10(12) M(-1)! The high levels of selectivity observed for each CB[n] individually is also observed for the CB[n] family collectively. That is, the selectivities of CB[6], CB[7], and CB[8] toward a common guest can be remarkably large. For example, guests 1, 3, and 11 prefer CB[8] relative to CB[7] by factors greater than 10(7), 10(6), and 3000, respectively. Conversely, guests 23 and 24 prefer CB[7] relative to CB[8] by factors greater than 5100 and 990, respectively. The high levels of selectivity observed individually and collectively for the CB[n] family renders them prime components for the preparation of functional biomimetic self-sorting systems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Chem Sci
                Chem Sci
                Chemical Science
                Royal Society of Chemistry
                2041-6520
                2041-6539
                1 June 2016
                17 February 2016
                : 7
                : 6
                : 3569-3573
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Ohio University , Athens , Ohio 45701 , USA . Email: masson@ 123456ohio.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6871-1955
                Article
                c5sc04475h
                10.1039/c5sc04475h
                6007185
                29997849
                1f047e71-9b2c-4fe7-8986-f90eda232f1b
                This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016

                This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY 3.0)

                History
                : 21 November 2015
                : 17 February 2016
                Categories
                Chemistry

                Notes

                †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Preparation and characterization of guests 3a–3k and their precursors; determination of binding affinities by competitive NMR titrations and ITC; computational procedures and data; Cartesian coordinates of the optimized structure of complexes 3a·CB[7] and 3e·CB[7]. See DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04475h


                Comments

                Comment on this article