Global trends in emerging infectious diseases

The next new disease

Emerging infectious diseases are a major threat to health: AIDS, SARS, drug-resistant bacteria and Ebola virus are among the more recent examples. By identifying emerging disease 'hotspots', the thinking goes, it should be possible to spot health risks at an early stage and prepare containment strategies. An analysis of over 300 examples of disease emerging between 1940 and 2004 suggests that these hotspots can be accurately mapped based on socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors. The data show that the surveillance effort, and much current research spending, is concentrated in developed economies, yet the risk maps point to developing countries as the more likely source of new diseases.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nature06536) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

The origins of emerging infections diseases are significantly correlated with socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nature06536) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) are a significant burden on global economies and public health ^{1, 2, 3} . Their emergence is thought to be driven largely by socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors ^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9} , but no comparative study has explicitly analysed these linkages to understand global temporal and spatial patterns of EIDs. Here we analyse a database of 335 EID ‘events’ (origins of EIDs) between 1940 and 2004, and demonstrate non-random global patterns. EID events have risen significantly over time after controlling for reporting bias, with their peak incidence (in the 1980s) concomitant with the HIV pandemic. EID events are dominated by zoonoses (60.3% of EIDs): the majority of these (71.8%) originate in wildlife (for example, severe acute respiratory virus, Ebola virus), and are increasing significantly over time. We find that 54.3% of EID events are caused by bacteria or rickettsia, reflecting a large number of drug-resistant microbes in our database. Our results confirm that EID origins are significantly correlated with socio-economic, environmental and ecological factors, and provide a basis for identifying regions where new EIDs are most likely to originate (emerging disease ‘hotspots’). They also reveal a substantial risk of wildlife zoonotic and vector-borne EIDs originating at lower latitudes where reporting effort is low. We conclude that global resources to counter disease emergence are poorly allocated, with the majority of the scientific and surveillance effort focused on countries from where the next important EID is least likely to originate.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nature06536) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.