8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TLR5 decoy receptor as a novel anti-amyloid therapeutic for Alzheimer’s disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chakrabarty et al. show that human TLR5 ectodomain reduces amyloid β (Aβ) plaques by direct interaction with Aβ, demonstrating the feasibility of such immune decoy receptor strategies as potential biotherapies in Alzheimer’s disease.

          Abstract

          There is considerable interest in harnessing innate immunity to treat Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we explore whether a decoy receptor strategy using the ectodomain of select TLRs has therapeutic potential in AD. AAV-mediated expression of human TLR5 ectodomain (sTLR5) alone or fused to human IgG4 Fc (sTLR5Fc) results in robust attenuation of amyloid β (Aβ) accumulation in a mouse model of Alzheimer-type Aβ pathology. sTLR5Fc binds to oligomeric and fibrillar Aβ with high affinity, forms complexes with Aβ, and blocks Aβ toxicity. Oligomeric and fibrillar Aβ modulates flagellin-mediated activation of human TLR5 but does not, by itself, activate TLR5 signaling. Genetic analysis shows that rare protein coding variants in human TLR5 may be associated with a reduced risk of AD. Further, transcriptome analysis shows altered TLR gene expression in human AD. Collectively, our data suggest that TLR5 decoy receptor–based biologics represent a novel and safe Aβ-selective class of biotherapy in AD.

          Graphical Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulation of innate immune responses in the brain.

          Microglial cells are the main innate immune cells of the complex cellular structure of the brain. These cells respond quickly to pathogens and injury, accumulate in regions of degeneration and produce a wide variety of pro-inflammatory molecules. These observations have resulted in active debate regarding the exact role of microglial cells in the brain and whether they have beneficial or detrimental functions. Careful targeting of these cells could have therapeutic benefits for several types of trauma and disease specific to the central nervous system. This Review discusses the molecular details underlying the innate immune response in the brain during infection, injury and disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            In vitro characterization of conditions for amyloid-beta peptide oligomerization and fibrillogenesis.

            Extensive research causally links amyloid-beta peptide (A beta) to Alzheimer's disease, although the pathologically relevant A beta conformation remains unclear. A beta spontaneously aggregates into the fibrils that deposit in senile plaques. However, recent in vivo and in vitro reports describe a potent biological activity for oligomeric assemblies of A beta. To consistently prepare in vitro oligomeric and fibrillar forms of A beta 1-42, a detailed knowledge of how solution parameters influence structure is required. This manuscript represents the first study using a single chemically and structurally homogeneous unaggregated starting material to demonstrate that the formation of oligomers, fibrils, and fibrillar aggregates is determined by time, concentration, temperature, pH, ionic strength, and A beta species. We recently reported that oligomers inhibit neuronal viability 10-fold more than fibrils and approximately 40-fold more than unaggregated peptide, with oligomeric A beta 1-42-induced neurotoxicity significant at 10 nm. In addition, we were able to differentiate by structure and neurotoxic activity wild-type A beta1-42 from isoforms containing familial mutations (Dahlgren, K. N., Manelli, A. M., Stine, W. B., Jr., Baker, L. K., Krafft, G. A., and LaDu, M. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 32046-32053). Understanding the biological role of specific A beta conformations may define the link between A beta and Alzheimer's disease, re-focusing therapeutic approaches by identifying the pernicious species of A beta ultimately responsible for the cognitive dysfunction that defines the disease.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Therapeutic targeting of innate immunity with Toll-like receptor agonists and antagonists.

              The identification of the antigen recognition receptors for innate immunity, most notably the Toll-like receptors, has sparked great interest in therapeutic manipulation of the innate immune system. Toll-like receptor agonists are being developed for the treatment of cancer, allergies and viral infections, and as adjuvants for potent new vaccines to prevent or treat cancer and infectious diseases. As recognition grows of the role of inappropriate Toll-like receptor stimulation in inflammation and autoimmunity, significant efforts have begun to develop antagonists to Toll-like receptors as well.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Exp Med
                J. Exp. Med
                jem
                jem
                The Journal of Experimental Medicine
                Rockefeller University Press
                0022-1007
                1540-9538
                03 September 2018
                : 215
                : 9
                : 2247-2264
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center for Translational Research in Neurodegenerative Disease, Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
                [2 ]McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
                [3 ]Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
                [4 ]Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA
                [5 ]Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Paramita Chakrabarty: pchakrabarty@ 123456ufl.edu
                Todd E. Golde: tgolde@ 123456ufl.edu
                [*]

                A. Li and T.B. Ladd contributed equally to this paper.

                A. Li’s present address is Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

                M.R. Strickland’s present address is Department of Neuroscience, Washington University, St. Louis, MN.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6226-3776
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-5651
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-4453
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4157-0267
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1867-7071
                Article
                20180484
                10.1084/jem.20180484
                6122970
                30158114
                1f15fd23-4c24-4a5b-b889-2d8e057da554
                © 2018 Chakrabarty et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 March 2018
                : 09 May 2018
                : 09 May 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000065;
                Award ID: U24 NS072026
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000049;
                Award ID: P30 AG19610
                Funded by: Arizona Department of Health Services, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100007306;
                Award ID: 211002
                Funded by: Arizona Biomedical Research Commission, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100008335;
                Award ID: 4001
                Award ID: 0011
                Award ID: 05-901
                Award ID: 1001
                Funded by: Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000864;
                Funded by: National Institute on Aging, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000049;
                Award ID: U01 AG046139
                Award ID: R01 AG018454
                Funded by: BrightFocus Foundation, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100006312;
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Brief Definitive Report
                311
                306
                320

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article