2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Risk-based enteric pathogen reduction targets for non-potable and direct potable use of roof runoff, stormwater, and greywater

      , , ,
      Microbial Risk Analysis
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="P1">This paper presents risk-based enteric pathogen log reduction targets for non-potable and potable uses of a variety of alternative source waters ( <i>i.e.</i>, locally-collected greywater, roof runoff, and stormwater). A probabilistic Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) was used to derive the pathogen log <sub>10</sub> reduction targets (LRTs) that corresponded with an infection risk of either 10 <sup>−4</sup> per person per year (ppy) or 10 <sup>−2</sup> ppy. The QMRA accounted for variation in pathogen concentration and sporadic pathogen occurrence (when data were available) in source waters for reference pathogens in the genera <i>Rotavirus</i>, Mastadenovirus(human adenoviruses), <i>Norovirus</i>, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Giardia and <i>Cryptosporidium</i>. Non-potable uses included indoor use (for toilet flushing and clothes washing) with occasional accidental ingestion of treated non-potable water (or cross-connection with potable water), and unrestricted irrigation for outdoor use. Various exposure scenarios captured the uncertainty from key inputs, <i>i.e.</i>, the pathogen concentration in source water; the volume of water ingested; and for the indoor use, the frequency of and the fraction of the population exposed to accidental ingestion. Both potable and non-potable uses required pathogen treatment for the selected waters and the LRT was generally greater for potable use than non-potable indoor use and unrestricted irrigation. The difference in treatment requirements among source waters was driven by the microbial quality of the water – both the density and occurrence of reference pathogens. Greywater from collection systems with 1000 people had the highest LRTs; however, those for greywater collected from a smaller population (~ 5 people), which have less frequent pathogen occurrences, were lower. Stormwater had highly variable microbial quality, which resulted in a range of possible treatment requirements. The microbial quality of roof runoff, and thus the resulting LRTs, remains uncertain due to lack of relevant pathogen data. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Microbial Risk Analysis
          Microbial Risk Analysis
          Elsevier BV
          23523522
          April 2017
          April 2017
          : 5
          : 32-43
          Article
          10.1016/j.mran.2017.01.002
          6750756
          31534999
          1faf1934-d2de-4cd3-905b-cc514a3e960b
          © 2017

          http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article