31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Coronavirus 2019-nCoV: Is the genie already out of the bottle?

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, Once again, a virus has jumped the species barrier. Coronavirus 2019-nCoV emerged apparently in a wet market in China, and after a few weeks the number of cases already exceeds those of SARS in 2002/03 (Fig. 1) [1] in terms of both morbidity and mortality. Excellent publications have addressed many aspects of a possible novel endemic/pandemic zoonosis, often with a focus on MERS-CoV (2–4), including prevention [2], drug and vaccine-development for coronaviruses [3], or the importance of “a ‘One Health’ approach to control … …zoonotic pathogens with epidemic potential” [4]. The hugely increased appetite for meat-products worldwide, but also in China [5], is likely to increase livestock production and sale, as well as scavenging of remaining wildlife resources, primarily the latter with consequent increases in the risk of exposure to novel infectious agents. Fig. 1 Epidemiological curve of 2019-nCoV and SARS (data source WHO [1]). All cases in China, with numbers of deaths and severe cases from the WHO Situation Reports (1–15) as of 5th of February. Note, the case fatality rate is very stable at around 2%, as well as the rather high rate of severe cases of around 15% (red arrow). Fig. 1 The role which few available drugs, e.g. nucleoside analog Remdesivir, lopinavir-ritonavir and ribavirin, which showed some limited activity in SARS/MERS-CoV [3], might play in the prevention or curbing disease episodes is not clear yet; neither the role of other compounds with some limited limited level of evidence of (not even necessarily 2019-nCoV) inhibitory activity mainly from animal testing, such as some antimalarials [6]. The development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and vaccines has been hampered in the past by the unpredictability of the next, emerging coronavirus [3]. The sudden public interest in a coronavirus vaccine seems somewhat ironic, given that vaccine hesitancy was identified as one of the ten global threats to health, identified in 2019 by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, the story of the Ebola vaccine [7] casts serious doubts on claims by some officials that a vaccine for the current 2019-CoV strain could be made available in a few months, given the huge challenges in developing, clinical testing, mass-producing and distributing such a vaccine. Of course, this makes prevention efforts the best, if not only practical option [2,4]. News about travel restrictions, looming economic turmoil and the (perceived) risk for one's personal health ring alarm bells around the globe. The number of cases may be much higher than the daily, ever-increasing numbers reported, as many infected individuals may be asymptomatic, or only be slightly symptomatic, yet still be infectious, as indicated by the viral load of 108 copies/ml sputum in the first German case [8]. The case-fatality-rate (CFR) in confirmed cases in China is rather stable at around 2% so far (Figure), although lower than for SARS (~10%) or MERS (~30%) [[3], [4], [5]]. Pandemic influenza, often used as a comparison at the moment, had an estimated CFR of 0.5% in confirmed cases and 0.05% in symptomatic cases during the 2009 season (H1N1) [9]. While it is expected that the 2019-nCoV causes more severe disease in those with underlying medical conditions, the first published case series (n = 99) reports that only 50% had co-morbidities, while the first two fatal cases had none, other than being smokers [10]. This leaves an important number rather overlooked: the number of severe cases (arrow in Fig. 1) which hovers around the 15% mark. It may be assumed that these patients require hospitalization, if not ventilation-based intensive care treatment. Given the limited number of (ventilator-equipped) intensive care beds, let alone negative pressure isolation beds, it seems obvious that even the treatment capacities of the most affluent countries will be very quickly exhausted if the epidemic spreads further. This is reminiscent of the large West-African Ebola virus disease outbreak 2013–2016, where possibly many people died of other (“usual”) health problems because the regular healthcare services were overwhelmed, if not rendered entirely dysfunctional [11]. Hopefully, China does manage to control this outbreak. If 2019-CoV reaches other densely populated areas with fragile health systems (a case was already observed in India [1]), we may be well underway towards a pandemic. Funding No funding received. Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study

          Summary Background In December, 2019, a pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) emerged in Wuhan, China. We aimed to further clarify the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Methods In this retrospective, single-centre study, we included all confirmed cases of 2019-nCoV in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital from Jan 1 to Jan 20, 2020. Cases were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR and were analysed for epidemiological, demographic, clinical, and radiological features and laboratory data. Outcomes were followed up until Jan 25, 2020. Findings Of the 99 patients with 2019-nCoV pneumonia, 49 (49%) had a history of exposure to the Huanan seafood market. The average age of the patients was 55·5 years (SD 13·1), including 67 men and 32 women. 2019-nCoV was detected in all patients by real-time RT-PCR. 50 (51%) patients had chronic diseases. Patients had clinical manifestations of fever (82 [83%] patients), cough (81 [82%] patients), shortness of breath (31 [31%] patients), muscle ache (11 [11%] patients), confusion (nine [9%] patients), headache (eight [8%] patients), sore throat (five [5%] patients), rhinorrhoea (four [4%] patients), chest pain (two [2%] patients), diarrhoea (two [2%] patients), and nausea and vomiting (one [1%] patient). According to imaging examination, 74 (75%) patients showed bilateral pneumonia, 14 (14%) patients showed multiple mottling and ground-glass opacity, and one (1%) patient had pneumothorax. 17 (17%) patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome and, among them, 11 (11%) patients worsened in a short period of time and died of multiple organ failure. Interpretation The 2019-nCoV infection was of clustering onset, is more likely to affect older males with comorbidities, and can result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. In general, characteristics of patients who died were in line with the MuLBSTA score, an early warning model for predicting mortality in viral pneumonia. Further investigation is needed to explore the applicability of the MuLBSTA score in predicting the risk of mortality in 2019-nCoV infection. Funding National Key R&D Program of China.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Broad-spectrum coronavirus antiviral drug discovery

            ABSTRACT Introduction: The highly pathogenic coronaviruses severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are lethal zoonotic viruses that have emerged into human populations these past 15 years. These coronaviruses are associated with novel respiratory syndromes that spread from person-to-person via close contact, resulting in high morbidity and mortality caused by the progression to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Areas covered: The risks of re-emergence of SARS-CoV from bat reservoir hosts, the persistence of MERS-CoV circulation, and the potential for future emergence of novel coronaviruses indicate antiviral drug discovery will require activity against multiple coronaviruses. In this review, approaches that antagonize viral nonstructural proteins, neutralize structural proteins, or modulate essential host elements of viral infection with varying levels of efficacy in models of highly pathogenic coronavirus disease are discussed. Expert opinion: Treatment of SARS and MERS in outbreak settings has focused on therapeutics with general antiviral activity and good safety profiles rather than efficacy data provided by cellular, rodent, or nonhuman primate models of highly pathogenic coronavirus infection. Based on lessons learned from SARS and MERS outbreaks, lack of drugs capable of pan-coronavirus antiviral activity increases the vulnerability of public health systems to a highly pathogenic coronavirus pandemic.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The Use of Antimalarial Drugs against Viral Infection

              In recent decades, drugs used to treat malaria infection have been shown to be beneficial for many other diseases, including viral infections. In particular, they have received special attention due to the lack of effective antiviral drugs against new emerging viruses (i.e., HIV, dengue virus, chikungunya virus, Ebola virus, etc.) or against classic infections due to drug-resistant viral strains (i.e., human cytomegalovirus). Here, we reviewed the in vitro/in vivo and clinical studies conducted to evaluate the antiviral activities of four classes of antimalarial drugs: Artemisinin derivatives, aryl-aminoalcohols, aminoquinolines, and antimicrobial drugs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Travel Med Infect Dis
                Travel Med Infect Dis
                Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
                Elsevier Ltd.
                1477-8939
                1873-0442
                7 February 2020
                7 February 2020
                : 101577
                Affiliations
                [1]Instituto de Microbiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
                [2]Clínica Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
                [3]Center of Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Instituto de Microbiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avendia Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal. t.hanscheid@ 123456medicina.ulisboa.pt
                Article
                S1477-8939(20)30027-2 101577
                10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101577
                7129349
                32044388
                20abd794-6585-41ef-9c62-c6a8ff6c4479
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 5 February 2020
                : 6 February 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article