29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    9
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of early enteral nutrition on patients with digestive tract surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Postoperative early enteral nutrition (EEN) is useful for the effective recovery of patients that have undergone surgery. However, the feasibility and efficacy of EEN in patients with digestive tract surgery remain inconclusive. In the present meta-analysis, the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and VIP databases were searched to identify controlled trials of patients with and without EEN following digestive tract surgery between October, 1966 and December, 2014. Methodological quality assessment was carried out for each of the included studies. For estimation of the analysis indexes, relative risk (RR) was used as the effect size of the the categorical variable, while the weighted mean difference (MD) was used as the effect size of the continuous variable. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 1,095 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that, EEN in patients with digestive tract surgery was more effective in decreasing the incidence of infectious [RR=0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38, 0.67; P<0.01] and non-infectious complications (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.43, 1.22; P<0.05) and shortening the length of first bowel action (MD=−4.10, 95% CI: −5.38, −2.82; P<0.05). It also had a significant influence on increasing the serum albumin (MD=2.87, 95% CI: 1.03, 4.71; P<0.05) and serum prealbumin (MD=0.04, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.05; P<0.05) levels. In conclusion, the results of the study have shown that EEN in patients with digestive tract surgery improved the nutritional status, reduced the risk of postoperative complications, shortened the length of hospital stay and promoted the functional recovery of the digestive system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Early enteral nutrition, provided within 24 h of injury or intensive care unit admission, significantly reduces mortality in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

            To determine whether the provision of early standard enteral nutrition (EN) confers treatment benefits to critically ill patients. Medline and EMBASE were searched. Hand citation review of retrieved guidelines and systematic reviews were undertaken, and academic and industry experts were contacted. Methodologically sound randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in critically ill patient populations that compared the delivery of standard EN, provided within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission or injury, to standard care were included. The primary analysis was conducted on clinically meaningful patient-oriented outcomes. Secondary analyses considered vomiting/regurgitation, pneumonia, bacteraemia, sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Meta-analyses were conducted using the odds ratio (OR) metric and a fixed effects model. The impact of heterogeneity was assessed using the I (2) metric. Six RCTs with 234 participants were analysed. The provision of early EN was associated with a significant reduction in mortality [OR = 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.85] and pneumonia (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.78). There were no other significant differences in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis and a simulation exercise confirmed the presence of a mortality reduction. Although the detection of a statistically significant reduction in mortality is promising, overall trial quality was low, trial size was small, and the findings may be restricted to the patient groups enrolled into included trials. The results of this meta-analysis should be confirmed by the conduct of a large multi-centre trial enrolling diverse critically ill patient groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a randomised multicentre trial.

              Although current opinion favours the use of enteral over parenteral nutrition, the clinical benefits of early postoperative nutrition in patients undergoing elective surgery have never been clearly shown. We aimed to test the hypothesis that postoperative enteral nutrition is better (fewer postoperative complications) than parenteral nutrition containing similar energy and nitrogen amounts (112 kJ kg(-1) day(-1) and 1.4 g aminoacid kg(-1) day(-1)). We did a randomised multicentre clinical trial in patients with gastrointestinal cancer who were malnourished and candidates for major elective surgery. 159 patients were assigned to enteral nutrition and 158 to parenteral nutrition. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of postoperative complications, and secondary endpoints were length of postoperative hospital stay, adverse effects, and treatment crossover. Analysis was by intention to treat. Postoperative complications occurred in 54 (34%) patients fed enterally versus 78 (49%) fed parenterally (relative risk 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90, p=0.005). Length of postoperative stay was 13.4 days and 15.0 days in the enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition groups, respectively (p=0.009). Adverse effects occurred in 56 (35%) patients fed enterally versus 22 (14%) patients fed parenterally (2.50, 1.61-3.86, p<0.0001). 14 (9%) patients on enteral nutrition had to switch to parenteral nutrition, whereas none of those fed parenterally crossed over to enteral feeding. We conclude that early enteral nutrition significantly reduces the complication rate and duration of postoperative stay compared with parenteral nutrition, although parenteral nutrition is better tolerated than enteral nutrition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Exp Ther Med
                Exp Ther Med
                ETM
                Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
                D.A. Spandidos
                1792-0981
                1792-1015
                October 2016
                01 August 2016
                01 August 2016
                : 12
                : 4
                : 2136-2144
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nutrition, Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 201508, P.R. China
                [2 ]Tong Ji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200120, P.R. China
                [3 ]Department of Nutrition, The First Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530027, P.R. China
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr Yong-Sheng Zhang, Department of Nutrition, The First Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, Guangxi 530027, P.R. China, E-mail: fnk724@ 123456163.com
                [*]

                Contributed equally

                Article
                ETM-0-0-3559
                10.3892/etm.2016.3559
                5038219
                27698702
                20b77506-3afc-4a99-9913-5176aa7bdaef
                Copyright: © Shu et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 11 December 2015
                : 25 July 2016
                Categories
                Articles

                Medicine
                early enteral nutrition,surgery,digestive tract,recovery,meta-analysis
                Medicine
                early enteral nutrition, surgery, digestive tract, recovery, meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article