0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A comprehensive, integrated approach to quality improvement and capacity building in burn care and prevention in low and middle-income countries: An overview

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Quality improvement requires a comprehensive integrated approach.

          • Clinical standards are a vital first step in improving outcomes for LMICs.

          • Capacity building needs a range of educational courses from basic to advanced.

          • Evaluation tools are needed to measure progress.

          Abstract

          Consistent evidence has emerged over many years that the mortality and morbidity outcomes for burn patients in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) lag behind those in more resource rich countries. Interburns is a charity that was set up with the aim of working to reduce the disparity in the number of cases of burns as well as the outcomes for patients in LMICs. This paper provides an overview of a cyclical framework for quality improvement in burn care for use in LMICs that has been developed using an iterative process over the last 10 years. Each phase of the process is outlined together with a description of the tools used to conduct a gap analysis within the service, which is then used to frame a programme of capacity enhancement. Recent externally reviewed projects have demonstrated sustained improvement with the use of this comprehensive and integrated approach over a three-year cycle. This overview paper will be supported by further publications that present these results in detail.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

          Background Many interventions found to be effective in health services research studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. Health services researchers recognize the need to evaluate not only summative outcomes but also formative outcomes to assess the extent to which implementation is effective in a specific setting, prolongs sustainability, and promotes dissemination into other settings. Many implementation theories have been published to help promote effective implementation. However, they overlap considerably in the constructs included in individual theories, and a comparison of theories reveals that each is missing important constructs included in other theories. In addition, terminology and definitions are not consistent across theories. We describe the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) that offers an overarching typology to promote implementation theory development and verification about what works where and why across multiple contexts. Methods We used a snowball sampling approach to identify published theories that were evaluated to identify constructs based on strength of conceptual or empirical support for influence on implementation, consistency in definitions, alignment with our own findings, and potential for measurement. We combined constructs across published theories that had different labels but were redundant or overlapping in definition, and we parsed apart constructs that conflated underlying concepts. Results The CFIR is composed of five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Eight constructs were identified related to the intervention (e.g., evidence strength and quality), four constructs were identified related to outer setting (e.g., patient needs and resources), 12 constructs were identified related to inner setting (e.g., culture, leadership engagement), five constructs were identified related to individual characteristics, and eight constructs were identified related to process (e.g., plan, evaluate, and reflect). We present explicit definitions for each construct. Conclusion The CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories. It can be used to guide formative evaluations and build the implementation knowledge base across multiple studies and settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review.

              Burns have been more prevalent among low socioeconomic populations and in less developed regions. Incredible advances in burn care and social development over the recent decades, however, should have placed the incidence and severity of burns in a downwards trend. The aim of this review was to give an overview on current trends in burn epidemiology across the world. Also the socioeconomic development in countries that have published epidemiological data used in this study has been taken into account when comparing the results. There was a worldwide downwards trend of burn incidence, burn severity, length of hospital stay, and mortality rate. These findings were particularly pronounced in very highly developed countries. Data from highly and medium developed countries were more heterogeneous. No studies could be obtained from low and middle income countries. Comparisons between the different studies were compromised by the fact that studies emerged from specialized facilities on one hand and general hospitals on the other. Analyzed studies were also frequently focusing on limited patient populations such as "children" or "elderly". Our findings indicate the need for an international burn database with a minimal data-set in order to obtain objective and comparable results in respect of burn epidemiology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Burns
                Burns
                Burns
                Elsevier
                0305-4179
                1879-1409
                1 December 2020
                December 2020
                : 46
                : 8
                : 1756-1767
                Affiliations
                [a ]Interburns, Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Swansea, Wales, UK
                [b ]Centre for Global Burn Injury Policy and Research, Swansea University, Wales, UK
                [c ]Choithram Hospital and Research Centre, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
                [d ]Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
                [e ]Mercy Clinics Enugu Nigeria, Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Nigeria
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author at: Centre for Global Burn Injury Policy and Research, College of Human and Health Sciences, Room 26 Haldane Building, Swansea University, SA2 8PP Wales, UK. t.s.potokar@ 123456swansea.ac.uk tom.potokar@ 123456interburns.org
                Article
                S0305-4179(20)30414-9
                10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.029
                7772751
                32616426
                2271255c-2c19-4132-9f59-e52b6b136f46
                © 2020 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Dermatology
                quality improvement,service improvement,low and middle-income countries
                Dermatology
                quality improvement, service improvement, low and middle-income countries

                Comments

                Comment on this article