99
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Revisions of Extensive Acetabular Defects with Impaction Grafting and a Cement Cup

      research-article
      , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD
      Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
      Springer-Verlag

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Loosening of acetabular components often leads to bony defects. Management of extensive acetabular bone loss in hip revision arthroplasty can be a tremendous challenge.

          Questions/purposes

          We asked whether a reconstruction with impacted bone grafts will provide a durable and pain-free function in extensive acetabular defects. We specifically determined the (1) survival rates with the end point of revision for any reason, aseptic revision, and radiographic loosening; (2) visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, Harris hip score (HHS), and the Oxford Hip Questionnaire score (OHQS); (3) number of repeat revisions; (4) complications; and (5) radiographic loosening, wear, and radiolucencies.

          Patients and Methods

          We retrospectively followed 25 patients (27 hips) with extensive acetabular defects. No patient was lost to followup. Two patients died during followup. Minimum followup was 3 years (mean, 8.8 years; range, 3–14.1 years).

          Results

          Three patients (three hips) underwent repeat revision surgery and another two patients (two hips) had radiographically loose hips. The 10-year survival rate was 88% (95% confidence interval, 74.2%–100%) with the end point acetabular revision for any reason and 95% (95% confidence interval, 86.0%–100%) with the end point acetabular revision for aseptic loosening. The mean HHSs were 55 points before surgery and 72 points postoperatively.

          Conclusions

          Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup is a reliable technique with a 10-year survival rate of 88% in patients with extensive acetabular deficiencies.

          Level of Evidence

          Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

              From 1982 to 1988, 147 cemented acetabular components were revised with cementless hemispheric press-fit components, with an average follow-up period of 5.7 years (range, 3-9 years). Acetabular defects were typed from 1 to 3 and reconstructed with a bulk or support allograft. Type 1 defects had bone lysis around cement anchor sites and required particulate graft. Type 2A and B defects displayed progressive bone loss superiorly and required particulate graft, femoral head bulk graft, or cup superiorization. Type 2C defects required medial wall repair with wafer femoral head graft. Type 3A and B defects demonstrated progressive amounts of superior rim deficiencies and were treated with structural distal femur or proximal tibia allograft. Six of the 147 components (4.0%), all type 3B, were considered radiographically and clinically unstable, warranting revision. Three of the six were revised. Moderate lateral allograft resorption was noted on radiographs, but host-graft union was confirmed at revision. Size, orientation, and method of fixation of the allografts play an important role in the integrity of structural allografts, while adequate remaining host-bone must be present to ensure bone ingrowth.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                B.Schreurs@orthop.umcn.nl
                Journal
                Clin Orthop Relat Res
                Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
                Springer-Verlag (New York )
                0009-921X
                1528-1132
                8 October 2010
                8 October 2010
                February 2011
                : 469
                : 2
                : 562-573
                Affiliations
                Department of Orthopaedics 357, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                Article
                1618
                10.1007/s11999-010-1618-8
                3018199
                20931308
                2280fccc-817e-49e0-b980-9c1b40ddc9a2
                © The Author(s) 2010
                History
                : 11 December 2009
                : 24 September 2010
                Categories
                Clinical Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2011

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article