2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      From Population to Subject-Specific Reference Intervals

      chapter-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In clinical practice, normal values or reference intervals are the main point of reference for interpreting a wide array of measurements, including biochemical laboratory tests, anthropometrical measurements, physiological or physical ability tests. They are historically defined to separate a healthy population from unhealthy and therefore serve a diagnostic purpose. Numerous cross-sectional studies use various classical parametric and nonparametric approaches to calculate reference intervals. Based on a large cross-sectional study (N = 60,799), we compute reference intervals for subpopulations (e.g. males and females) which illustrate that subpopulations may have their own specific and more narrow reference intervals. We further argue that each healthy subject may actually have its own reference interval (subject-specific reference intervals or SSRIs). However, for estimating such SSRIs longitudinal data are required, for which the traditional reference interval estimating methods cannot be used. In this study, a linear quantile mixed model (LQMM) is proposed for estimating SSRIs from longitudinal data. The SSRIs can help clinicians to give a more accurate diagnosis as they provide an interval for each individual patient. We conclude that it is worthwhile to develop a dedicated methodology to bring the idea of subject-specific reference intervals to the preventive healthcare landscape.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          A New Body Shape Index Predicts Mortality Hazard Independently of Body Mass Index

          Background Obesity, typically quantified in terms of Body Mass Index (BMI) exceeding threshold values, is considered a leading cause of premature death worldwide. For given body size (BMI), it is recognized that risk is also affected by body shape, particularly as a marker of abdominal fat deposits. Waist circumference (WC) is used as a risk indicator supplementary to BMI, but the high correlation of WC with BMI makes it hard to isolate the added value of WC. Methods and Findings We considered a USA population sample of 14,105 non-pregnant adults ( ) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004 with follow-up for mortality averaging 5 yr (828 deaths). We developed A Body Shape Index (ABSI) based on WC adjusted for height and weight: ABSI had little correlation with height, weight, or BMI. Death rates increased approximately exponentially with above average baseline ABSI (overall regression coefficient of per standard deviation of ABSI [95% confidence interval: – ]), whereas elevated death rates were found for both high and low values of BMI and WC. ( – ) of the population mortality hazard was attributable to high ABSI, compared to ( – ) for BMI and ( – ) for WC. The association of death rate with ABSI held even when adjusted for other known risk factors including smoking, diabetes, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol. ABSI correlation with mortality hazard held across the range of age, sex, and BMI, and for both white and black ethnicities (but not for Mexican ethnicity), and was not weakened by excluding deaths from the first 3 yr of follow-up. Conclusions Body shape, as measured by ABSI, appears to be a substantial risk factor for premature mortality in the general population derivable from basic clinical measurements. ABSI expresses the excess risk from high WC in a convenient form that is complementary to BMI and to other known risk factors.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Establishing reference intervals for clinical laboratory test results: is there a better way?

            Reference intervals are essential for clinical laboratory test interpretation and patient care. Methods for estimating them are expensive, difficult to perform, often inaccurate, and nonreproducible. A computerized indirect Hoffmann method was studied for accuracy and reproducibility. The study used data collected retrospectively for 5 analytes without exclusions and filtering from a nationwide chain of clinical reference laboratories in the United States. The accuracy was assessed by the comparability of reference intervals as calculated by the new method with published peer-reviewed studies, and reproducibility was assessed by the comparability of 2 sets of reference intervals derived from 2 different data sets. There was no statistically significant difference between the calculated and published reference intervals or between the 2 sets of intervals that were derived from different data sets. A computerized Hoffmann method for indirect estimation of reference intervals using stored test results is proved to be accurate and reproducible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Linear quantile mixed models

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                V.Krzhizhanovskaya@uva.nl
                G.Zavodszky@uva.nl
                m.h.lees@uva.nl
                dongarra@icl.utk.edu
                p.m.a.sloot@uva.nl
                sergio.brissos@intellegibilis.com
                joao.teixeira@intellegibilis.com
                murih.pusparum@uhasselt.be , murih.pusparum@vito.be
                Journal
                978-3-030-50423-6
                10.1007/978-3-030-50423-6
                Computational Science – ICCS 2020
                Computational Science – ICCS 2020
                20th International Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 3–5, 2020, Proceedings, Part IV
                978-3-030-50422-9
                978-3-030-50423-6
                23 May 2020
                : 12140
                : 468-482
                Affiliations
                [8 ]GRID grid.7177.6, ISNI 0000000084992262, University of Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [9 ]GRID grid.7177.6, ISNI 0000000084992262, University of Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [10 ]GRID grid.7177.6, ISNI 0000000084992262, University of Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [11 ]GRID grid.411461.7, ISNI 0000 0001 2315 1184, University of Tennessee, ; Knoxville, TN USA
                [12 ]GRID grid.7177.6, ISNI 0000000084992262, University of Amsterdam, ; Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [13 ]Intellegibilis, Setúbal, Portugal
                [14 ]Intellegibilis, Setúbal, Portugal
                [15 ]GRID grid.12155.32, ISNI 0000 0001 0604 5662, Hasselt University, ; 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
                [16 ]GRID grid.6717.7, ISNI 0000000120341548, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), ; 2400 Mol, Belgium
                [17 ]GRID grid.5342.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2069 7798, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, , Ghent University, ; 9000 Ghent, Belgium
                [18 ]National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia (NIASRA), Wollongong, NSW 2500 Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9560-0612
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-6435
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6442-4089
                Article
                35
                10.1007/978-3-030-50423-6_35
                7303731
                2281a2b9-790a-40b8-9a2a-01dc40fd73be
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

                clinical statistics,clinical biochemistry,reference intervals,longitudinal data,quantile mixed models

                Comments

                Comment on this article