14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gas Partial Pressure in Cultured Cells: Patho-Physiological Importance and Methodological Approaches

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gas partial pressures within the cell microenvironment are one of the key modulators of cell pathophysiology. Indeed, respiratory gases (O 2 and CO 2) are usually altered in respiratory diseases and gasotransmitters (CO, NO, H 2S) have been proposed as potential therapeutic agents. Investigating the pathophysiology of respiratory diseases in vitro mandates that cultured cells are subjected to gas partial pressures similar to those experienced by each cell type in its native microenvironment. For instance, O 2 partial pressures range from ∼13% in the arterial endothelium to values as low as 2–5% in cells of other healthy tissues and to less than 1% in solid tumor cells, clearly much lower values than those used in conventional cell culture research settings (∼19%). Moreover, actual cell O 2 partial pressure in vivo changes with time, at considerably different timescales as illustrated by tumors, sleep apnea, or mechanical ventilation. Unfortunately, the conventional approach to modify gas concentrations at the above culture medium precludes the tight and exact control of intra-cellular gas levels to realistically mimic the natural cell microenvironment. Interestingly, well-controlled cellular application of gas partial pressures is currently possible through commercially available silicone-like material (PDMS) membranes, which are biocompatible and have a high permeability to gases. Cells are seeded on one side of the membrane and tailored gas concentrations are circulated on the other side of the membrane. Using thin membranes (50–100 μm) the value of gas concentration is instantaneously (<0.5 s) transmitted to the cell microenvironment. As PDMS is transparent, cells can be concurrently observed by conventional or advanced microscopy. This procedure can be implemented in specific-purpose microfluidic devices and in settings that do not require expensive or complex technologies, thus making the procedure readily implementable in any cell biology laboratory. This review describes the gas composition requirements for a cell culture in respiratory research, the limitations of current experimental settings, and also suggests new approaches to better control gas partial pressures in a cell culture.

          Related collections

          Most cited references91

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tumour acidosis: from the passenger to the driver's seat

          This Review by Corbet and Feron summarizes recent data showing that tumour acidosis influences cancer metabolism and contributes to cancer progression; it also highlights advances in therapeutic modalities aimed at either inhibiting or exploiting tumour acidification.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices.

            Culture of cells using various microfluidic devices is becoming more common within experimental cell biology. At the same time, a technological radiation of microfluidic cell culture device designs is currently in progress. Ultimately, the utility of microfluidic cell culture will be determined by its capacity to permit new insights into cellular function. Especially insights that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to obtain with macroscopic cell culture in traditional polystyrene dishes, flasks or well-plates. Many decades of heuristic optimization have gone into perfecting conventional cell culture devices and protocols. In comparison, even for the most commonly used microfluidic cell culture devices, such as those fabricated from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), collective understanding of the differences in cellular behavior between microfluidic and macroscopic culture is still developing. Moving in vitro culture from macroscopic culture to PDMS based devices can come with unforeseen challenges. Changes in device material, surface coating, cell number per unit surface area or per unit media volume may all affect the outcome of otherwise standard protocols. In this review, we outline some of the advantages and challenges that may accompany a transition from macroscopic to microfluidic cell culture. We focus on decisive factors that distinguish macroscopic from microfluidic cell culture to encourage a reconsideration of how macroscopic cell culture principles might apply to microfluidic cell culture.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quantifying forces in cell biology

              Physical forces influence the growth and development of all organisms. In the second Review in the Series on Mechanobiology, Trepat and co-authors describe techniques to measure forces generated by cells, and discuss their use and limitations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Physiol
                Front Physiol
                Front. Physiol.
                Frontiers in Physiology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-042X
                13 December 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 1803
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Unitat de Biofísica i Bioenginyeria, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [2] 2CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias , Madrid, Spain
                [3] 3Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer , Barcelona, Spain
                [4] 4Sleep Lab, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona , Barcelona, Spain
                [5] 5Department of Child Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine , Columbia, MO, United States
                [6] 6Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology , Barcelona, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Reinoud Gosens, University of Groningen, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Vincent Joseph, Laval University, Canada; Pawan Sharma, University of Technology Sydney, Australia

                *Correspondence: Ramon Farré, rfarre@ 123456ub.edu

                This article was submitted to Respiratory Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

                Article
                10.3389/fphys.2018.01803
                6300470
                229d238e-a300-4055-9ea3-be3074d962fb
                Copyright © 2018 Farré, Almendros, Montserrat, Gozal and Navajas.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 July 2018
                : 29 November 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 108, Pages: 12, Words: 0
                Categories
                Physiology
                Review

                Anatomy & Physiology
                hypoxia,hyperoxia,hypercapnia,cell microenvironment,respiratory diseases,sleep apnea,mechanical ventilation,cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article