4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The impact of COVID-19 on delayed presentations of necrotising fasciitis

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the delayed presentation of necrotising fasciitis (NF). A retrospective study was conducted of adult patients (≥16 years old) diagnosed with NF at a hospital from 2017 to 2020. A quantitative comparative analysis for the COVID-19 group and control group between 2017 and 2019. Structured interviews were conducted to examine the impact of COVID-19 on patients. There were 6 patients in the COVID-19 group and 10 patients in the control group. The COVID-19 group had a longer mean onset of symptoms till hospital presentation of 4.1 days and a longer mean operative time. The COVID-19 group was more likely to be admitted to intensive care unit. Three patients in the COVID-19 group did not survive compared to survival in the counterparts. Participant responses indicated the COVID-19 pandemic did not prevent them from presenting to ED.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality.

          Necrotizing fasciitis is a life-threatening soft-tissue infection primarily involving the superficial fascia. The present report describes the clinical presentation and microbiological characteristics of this condition as well as the determinants of mortality associated with this uncommon surgical emergency. The medical records of eighty-nine consecutive patients who had been admitted to our institution for necrotizing fasciitis from January 1997 to August 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. The paucity of cutaneous findings early in the course of the disease makes the diagnosis difficult, and only thirteen of the eighty-nine patients had a diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis at the time of admission. Preadmission treatment with antibiotics modified the initial clinical picture and often masked the severity of the underlying infection. Polymicrobial synergistic infection was the most common cause (forty-eight patients; 53.9%), with streptococci and enterobacteriaceae being the most common isolates. Group-A streptococcus was the most common cause of monomicrobial necrotizing fasciitis. The most common associated comorbidity was diabetes mellitus (sixty-three patients; 70.8%). Advanced age, two or more associated comorbidities, and a delay in surgery of more than twenty-four hours adversely affected the outcome. Multivariate analysis showed that only a delay in surgery of more than twenty-four hours was correlated with increased mortality (p < 0.05; relative risk = 9.4). Early operative débridement was demonstrated to reduce mortality among patients with this condition. A high index of suspicion is important in view of the paucity of specific cutaneous findings early in the course of the disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections.

            Early operative debridement is a major determinant of outcome in necrotizing fasciitis. However, early recognition is difficult clinically. We aimed to develop a novel diagnostic scoring system for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections based on laboratory tests routinely performed for the evaluation of severe soft tissue infections: the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score. Retrospective observational study of patients divided into a developmental cohort (n = 314) and validation cohort (n = 140) Two teaching tertiary care hospitals. One hundred forty-five patients with necrotizing fasciitis and 309 patients with severe cellulitis or abscesses admitted to the participating hospitals. None. The developmental cohort consisted of 89 consecutive patients admitted for necrotizing fasciitis. Control patients (n = 225) were randomly selected from patients admitted with severe cellulitis or abscesses during the same period. Hematologic and biochemical results done on admission were converted into categorical variables for analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to select significant predictors. Total white cell count, hemoglobin, sodium, glucose, serum creatinine, and C-reactive protein were selected. The LRINEC score was constructed by converting into integer the regression coefficients of independently predictive factors in the multiple logistic regression model for diagnosing necrotizing fasciitis. The cutoff value for the LRINEC score was 6 points with a positive predictive value of 92.0% and negative predictive value of 96.0%. Model performance was very good (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic, p =.910); area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.980 and 0.976 in the developmental and validation cohorts, respectively. The LRINEC score is a robust score capable of detecting even clinically early cases of necrotizing fasciitis. The variables used are routinely measured to assess severe soft tissue infections. Patients with a LRINEC score of > or = 6 should be carefully evaluated for the presence of necrotizing fasciitis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Surg Case Rep
                J Surg Case Rep
                jscr
                Journal of Surgical Case Reports
                Oxford University Press
                2042-8812
                February 2022
                06 February 2022
                06 February 2022
                : 2022
                : 2
                : rjac015
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital , Bankstown, NSW, Australia
                [2 ] The University of New South Wales , Faculty of Medicine, Kensington, NSW, Australia
                [3 ] The University of Notre Dame , School of Medicine, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence address. Emergency Department, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Eldridge Road, Bankstown, NSW, Australia. Tel: +61-(2)-9722-8000; Fax: +61-(2)-9722-8570; E-mail: dungquocnguyen7590@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2185-8570
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0740-3737
                Article
                rjac015
                10.1093/jscr/rjac015
                8826021
                35145627
                23037319-c3d4-4e00-830e-4e4319335a4d
                Published by Oxford University Press and JSCR Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2022.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 31 December 2021
                : 6 January 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Categories
                AcademicSubjects/MED00910
                jscrep/0130
                Case Series

                Comments

                Comment on this article