1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impaired auditory discrimination and auditory-motor integration in hyperfunctional voice disorders

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs) are the most common class of voice disorders, consisting of diagnoses such as vocal fold nodules and muscle tension dysphonia. These speech production disorders result in effort, fatigue, pain, and even complete loss of voice. The mechanisms underlying HVDs are largely unknown. Here, the auditory-motor control of voice fundamental frequency ( f o) was examined in 62 speakers with and 62 speakers without HVDs. Due to the high prevalence of HVDs in singers, and the known impacts of singing experience on auditory-motor function, groups were matched for singing experience. Speakers completed three tasks, yielding: (1) auditory discrimination of voice f o; (2) reflexive responses to sudden f o shifts; and (3) adaptive responses to sustained f o shifts. Compared to controls, and regardless of singing experience, individuals with HVDs showed: (1) worse auditory discrimination; (2) comparable reflexive responses; and (3) a greater frequency of atypical adaptive responses. Atypical adaptive responses were associated with poorer auditory discrimination, directly implicating auditory function in this motor disorder. These findings motivate a paradigm shift for understanding development and treatment of HVDs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Voice disorders in the general population: prevalence, risk factors, and occupational impact.

          Epidemiologic studies of the prevalence and risk factors of voice disorders in the general adult population are rare. The purpose of this investigation was to 1) determine the prevalence of voice disorders, 2) identify variables associated with increased risk of voice disorders, and 3) establish the functional impact of voice disorders on the general population. Cross-sectional telephone survey. A random sample (n = 1,326) of adults in Iowa and Utah was interviewed using a questionnaire that addressed three areas related to voice disorders: prevalence, potential risk factors, and occupational consequences/effects. The lifetime prevalence of a voice disorder was 29.9%, with 6.6% of participants reporting a current voice disorder. Stepwise logistic regression identified specific factors that uniquely contributed to increased odds of reporting a chronic voice disorder including sex (women), age (40-59 years), voice use patterns and demands, esophageal reflux, chemical exposures, and frequent cold/sinus infections. However, tobacco or alcohol use did not independently increase the odds of reporting of a chronic voice disorder. Voice disorders adversely impacted job performance and attendance, with 4.3% of participants indicating that their voice had limited or rendered them unable to do certain tasks in their current job. Furthermore, 7.2% of employed respondents reported that they were absent from work 1 or more days in the past year because of their voice, and 2% reported more than 4 days of voice-related absence. The results of this large epidemiologic study provide valuable information regarding the prevalence of voice disorders, factors that contribute to voice disorder vulnerability, and the functional impact of voice problems on the general population.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.

            This article presents the development of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) following a consensus conference on perceptual voice quality measurement sponsored by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Special Interest Division 3, Voice and Voice Disorders. The CAPE-V protocol and recording form were designed to promote a standardized approach to evaluating and documenting auditory-perceptual judgments of vocal quality. A summary of the consensus conference proceedings and the factors considered by the authors in developing this instrument are included. The CAPE-V form and instructions, included as appendices to this article, enable clinicians to document perceived voice quality deviations following a standard (i.e., consistent and specified) protocol.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                dabur@bu.edu
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                23 June 2021
                23 June 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 13123
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.189504.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7558, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, , Boston University, ; Boston, MA 02215 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.189504.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7558, Department of Biomedical Engineering, , Boston University, ; Boston, MA 02215 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.34477.33, ISNI 0000000122986657, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, , University of Washington, ; Seattle, WA 98195 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.189504.1, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7558, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, , Boston University School of Medicine, ; Boston, MA 02118 USA
                Article
                92250
                10.1038/s41598-021-92250-8
                8222324
                34162907
                2305680d-817b-4c39-bd59-9408dc5bfc87
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 22 February 2021
                : 4 June 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000055, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders;
                Award ID: F31 DC019032
                Award ID: P50 DC015446
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100002607, American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation;
                Award ID: New Century Doctoral Scholarship
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Rafik B. Hariri Institute for Computing and Computational Science & Engineering
                Award ID: Graduate Fellow Award
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                auditory system,motor control,sensorimotor processing,sensory processing
                Uncategorized
                auditory system, motor control, sensorimotor processing, sensory processing

                Comments

                Comment on this article